similar to: Samba vs 2.0.6 and Win9x clients

Hello All, I recently downloaded, compiled, and installed vs 2.0.6 of samba on a Digital Unix 4.0E system. I set up security to point to our single NT domain controller, and set up a user map for those users who don't have identical Unix and NT Domain usernames. I can access all of the shares correctly from an NT client. On Win9x, I can map the shares and see the first level directory,

Hi there, I have a somewhat wide experience with samba. I've succesfully installed it as a client as well as a PDC on Windows networks. The last time, however, there has been an issue with the win9x stations. I've setup the Samba server over Linux to act as a PDC for the domain. I use dhcp to assign the network configuration to the hosts, and the only protocol installed on them is

Greetings, I have a configuration question regarding using samba, a win98 machine in a Nt domain. Situation: 2 linux boxes both running samba 3.0.1 winxp and win98 winnt as domain server. >From my win98 machine, I can see the shares on linux box a. (Running Fedora/samba 3.0.1) >From my win98 machine, I CAN NOT see the share on linux box b (Redhat 9/samba 3.0.1) However, from the xp

Hi all, I have two systems using Win98 and one using Win95. These three systems do not automatically execute their login scripts. I can map the network drives manually and tell them to reconnect at login, but I am wondering why they don't execute them. I can log in, browse to my netlogon share (if I make it browseable), and execute the script manually, and it works. Well, it mostly

Many thanks to those who have replied so far - still no luck unfortunately. It would appear that I was ni=ot quite specific enough in the original post re: the OS version I am using - it is Windows 98SE, NOT vanilla 98. As for the login script I am using, I tried originally with the NT/2K script I use for all the other machines (logical as they are all NT/2K!): #### Script starts here ####

Hello, We have recently joined a Windows Server 2008 R1 on our samba domain as a domain member. The samba domain controller runs Samba version 3.4.9 on FreeBSD 8.2. We use the Windows Server as a terminal server for our domain users who need an accounting application called Acomba. Therefore we have added TS User CALs to the server in question. The TS Licensing Server was activated and the

On Jul 5, 2012, at 1:33 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Bill, > >> Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem? > > I don't see any relevant LLVM changes, so I guess clang C++ compilation slowed > down due to some clang changes. I'm not going to investigate this. > Crumbs. John, Do you know of anything that went into

Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem? -bw On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Did something change with exception handling recently? A bunch of lit bots are > showing slower compile times for many tests. > > Ciao, Duncan. > > On 20/06/12 07:53, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu

Hi Bill, > Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem? I don't see any relevant LLVM changes, so I guess clang C++ compilation slowed down due to some clang changes. I'm not going to investigate this. Ciao, Duncan. > > -bw > > On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > >> Did

Are these 225 compile time regressions real? It sure looks bad! Ciao, Duncan. On 01/12/11 09:39, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > > bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results > > URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/ > Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4 > Name curlew.apple.com > > Run ID Order Start Time End Time > Current 380

As an addendum to my original message (copied below), I have tried a couple of things and have found the following: Running a one line login script, eg net use * \\server\share with an echo command produces the following output: The syntax is incorrect. For help, type NET USE /? at the command prompt. Yet running the same script one the machine as soon after login as possible results in he

Did something change with exception handling recently? A bunch of lit bots are showing slower compile times for many tests. Ciao, Duncan. On 20/06/12 07:53, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > > lab-mini-03__O0-g__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283?compare_to=1278&baseline=999> > > Run Order Start Time Duration >

Hi Chris and others! I totally support any work in this direction. In the current state LNT’s regression detection system is too noisy, which makes it almost impossible to use in some cases. If after each run a developer gets a dozen of ‘regressions’, none of which happens to be real, he/she won’t care about such reports after a while. We clearly need to filter out as much noise as we can - and

On 07/30/2013 10:03 AM, Star Tan wrote: > Hi Tobias and all Polly developers, > > I have re-evaluated the Polly compile-time performance using newest > LLVM/Polly source code. You can view the results on > http://188.40.87.11:8000 > <http://188.40.87.11:8000/db_default/v4/nts/16?compare_to=9&baseline=9&aggregation_fn=median>. > > Especially, I also evaluated

Hi, I've setup samba for the first time and can see Win98 and WinNT 4.0 shares from my FreeBSD machines. Conversely, I can see "Unix Shares" from both Win98 and WinNT 4.0 I followed the instructions found in http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/DIAGNOSIS.html <http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/DIAGNOSIS.html> One thing I cannot do is have the FreeBSD machines use Samba to

At 2013-08-01 23:29:14,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >On 07/31/2013 09:23 PM, Star Tan wrote: >> At 2013-07-31 22:50:57,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es >> <mailto:tobias at grosser.es>> wrote: >> >>>On 07/30/2013 10:03 AM, Star Tan wrote: >>>> Hi Tobias and all Polly developers,

On 07/31/2013 09:23 PM, Star Tan wrote: > At 2013-07-31 22:50:57,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es > <mailto:tobias at grosser.es>> wrote: > >>On 07/30/2013 10:03 AM, Star Tan wrote: >>> Hi Tobias and all Polly developers, >>> >>> I have re-evaluated the Polly compile-time performance using newest >>> LLVM/Polly source

> Good day to all! i have a question, i succesfully set up a samba server. but > during its operation i encounter a repeated problem, here it goes: > i follow the instruction in diagnosis.txt and it all has pass the test, but > when im trying the: > "smbclient -L file://bigserver/tmp -Ujohn%secret" sometimes i passed and i get the > "smb:\>" prompt. and

Hi there, I have a somewhat wide experience with samba. I've succesfully installed it as a client as well as a PDC on Windows networks. The last time, however, there has been an issue with the win9x stations. I've setup the Samba server over Linux to act as a PDC for the domain. I use dhcp to assign the network configuration to the hosts, and the only protocol installed on them is

At 2013-07-31 22:50:57,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >On 07/30/2013 10:03 AM, Star Tan wrote: >> Hi Tobias and all Polly developers, >> >> I have re-evaluated the Polly compile-time performance using newest >> LLVM/Polly source code. You can view the results on >> http://188.40.87.11:8000 >>