similar to: VMware hostonly networking

Hello David, After some experiments and discussions I came to the following result concerning private NT-Box connecting to a LAN via ipchains and using all NETBIOS services (incl. domain-logon): Cross-subnet browsing with NETBIOS could only be done by a local master browser in the private net. I first thought of using Samba on the Linux router for that. But the Samba service would have to use

(refers to posting "Samba 3.0 + ADS, winbind problem" from August, 28th) Setup: client: SuSE8.2 professional (kernel 2.4.20-4GB) with openldap2 2.1.12 and heimdal kerberos 0.4e from the SuSE CDs and Samba 3.0.0RC3 compiled from source with flags "--with-ads --with-pam --with-acl-support". server: Windows 2003 Server as Active Directory Controller (configured as pure

Can a router between two subnets (call it A and B) be the local master browser of the one subnet (net A) in a NT domain, when the Domain Master Browser (as well as PDC and BDC) are located in the other subnet (B)? Will say, does the Domain Master Browser of a NT domain accept a Local Master Browser in the same subnet (as the router is accessed from B via the interface ethB)? The reason for my

I'am using Samba 3.0rc1 on a SuSE 8.2 system (heimdal kerberos). I managed to join a Active Directory REALM, but I have difficulties with user authentification. Something may be wrong with my winbind setup: e.g. I cannot connect from a Windows 2003 Server to a samba share without being prompted for account and password. Furtheron wbinfo -u returns "error looking up domain users", but

Hello, we run samba 2.0.6 on Solaris2.6 and use it together with clearcase (version 3.2.1). Sometimes the checkout of files from a clearcase NT-client hangs and probably causes clearcase to destroy the viewstore. In the samba logfile of that client I found the following message: [2000/02/17 09:29:49, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2401) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not

As I posted to samba@samba.org one month ago, we found the same error as Chuck Thier (smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2401) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented.) as a possible reason for some crashes of ClearCase clients on WindowsNT (we use Samba 2.0.6 on Solaris 2.6 and ClearCase 3.2.1). Therefore I support his wish, that this functionality should be implemented in samba

I'm hoping this turns into another case of 'knowing it works makes it happen.' I am involved with a unix clearcase installation which now needs to work with nt. We have clearcase 3.2.1 running on both the unix and nt side. Because we have checkin/checkout triggers hooked to some unix-side stuff, we need the unix views to be accessible from nt. Does anyone have direct experience

On Thu, 4 Feb 2016, Martinx - ????? wrote: > My last try was, during Packer build, to append "add_drivers+=" > sd_mod" to /etc/dracut.conf and re-building initramdisk by running > "dracut -f". However, it does not boot either (on ESXi)! > > I can still boot using Rescue mode on VMWare, then, I can see that > sd_mod is inside of initramfs as expected

Is there anyone out there successfully using Rational Clearcase with SAMBA? Was there any special changes you had to make to get it to work? We were told by Rational specifically not to use SAMBA and wanted to get the other side. TIA Paul Gilles Navigation Technologies -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/ms-tnef

I seem to have run into https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855640, because when I tried the fix/work-around at the end (comment 11), ethtool -K eth0 gro off, my download speed by speedtest went from undetectable to ~150Mb/s. However, it was not able to connect for the upload test, and so something may still be off. Non-virtual machines can do the upload test, so it's not just a

Dear Boyland, In collaboration with some of this mailing list users, I had put some effort in optimising the guest settings in function of a windows guest. The libvirt-gui doesn't include these options. You'll have to edit the XML in virsh. This was my conclusion on 15-03-2015 but I added the hugepages tip in this list today. As for networking, I only use or bridged or the default virtual

I've been using VMware just fine in bridging mode, but it breaks when I'm somewhere that will only give me 1 IP address. To fix this problem, I've been looking at MASQUERADING and host-only mode networking. My problem is that I don't see the NT domain stuff in this mode. I've tried to put the WINS server setting in the DHCP configuration, but to no avail. So, I'm

http://libvirt.org/drvvmware.html says "The libvirt VMware driver should be able to manage any Workstation, Player, Fusion version supported by the VMware VIX API." 1. Does this mean it supports the vmware hypervisor, or just that it understands the disk images and perhaps other cotnrol file info? 2. If it supports the hypervisor, does this mean that kvm and vmware hypervisors can be

I tried to join a samba4 to a win2008r2 level domain (OS level 2012) running exchange 2010. The join succeeds but the later replication is broken due to schema differences. In order to to find the cause, I started a test setup with: * a win2008r2 DC w/ minimal AD * upgraded the schema and the OS to 2012 (function level is still 2008r2) * and added a exchange server to the domain. And that is

Server: Linux 2.2.10 samba-2.0.5a-1 (rpm) Client: Win98 inside vmware1.0.2 using hostonly networking. Problem: 'Unable to browse the network' I have worked my way through the tests in DIAGNOSIS.txt, and all tests pass. If I run Test 9 "net use x: \\BIGSERVER\TMP" from a MS-DOS prompt, then I can see my linux /tmp directory in x:. BUT if I just log in to Windows

Default boot volume on Fedora is 500M, with a kernel installonly_limit of 3. So far this seems sufficient, even accounting for the "rescue kernel" (which is really a nohostonly initramfs, which is quite a bit larger than the standard hostonly initramfs used for numbered kernels).

I have installed samba for the first time and I try to start it in a windows 95 environement. I started nmbd and smbd with the config file listed at the end of this mail (I remove all comment for clarity) I expect to use samba with the SHARE protocol of Windows 95 (No WINS) The new server (sdmpcsv02) is recognised by the other pc's but the can list the exported files The smbclient -L

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Torvald Riegel <torvald at se.inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote: > On Tuesday 13 July 2010 19:48:25 you wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Torvald Riegel >> > I thought that the layout of structs was supposed to be preserved (wrong >> > assumption?). Otherwise, any ideas why this happens? >> >> It should be preserved in

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Torvald Riegel > <torvald at se.inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote: >> On Tuesday 13 July 2010 19:48:25 you wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Torvald Riegel >>> > I thought that the layout of structs was supposed to be preserved (wrong

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Andrew Lenharth <andrewl at lenharth.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Torvald Riegel >> <torvald at se.inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote: >>> On Tuesday 13 July 2010 19:48:25 you wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:09