Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "Samba performance on FreeBSD"
2000 Feb 03
1
Performance Samba 2.0.6 / FreeBSD 3.4 vs NT and NetWare
I'm getting samba setup, and it seems to be working. I have PDC/BackupPDC
issues to resolve, and want to change things so the NT PDC authenticates
users instead of setting them up using smbpasswd. Right now, I can access
the samba box from Win98 and WinNT workstation with "manually setup"
smbpasswd's.
I have been testing performance and am a little disappointed, I hoped samba
2000 Feb 09
0
FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE/samba 2.0.6 problems
Synopsis: samba 2.0.6 running under FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE is much faster
than the same running under FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE, even after
replacing the 3.4-RELEASE kernel with the 3.4-STABLE kernel.
(This has been reported to FreeBSD GNATS as "kern/16605")
I have 2.0.6 running under FreeBSD using the following smb.conf:
[global]
workgroup = <NT Domain>
server string =
2004 Nov 24
2
5-STABLE softupdates issue?
Greetings,
out of fun and to investigate claims about alleged bgfsck resource
hogging (which I could not reproduce) posted to
news:de.comp.os.unix.bsd, I pressed the reset button on a live FreeBSD
5-STABLE system.
Upon reboot, fsck -p complained about an unexpected softupdates
inconsistency on the / file system and put me into single user mode, the
manual fsck / then asked me to agree to
2008 Jun 04
1
mystery: lock up after fs dump
I wouldn't report this if not for one coincidence (which is described
below). I have too little facts, so this is more of a mystery problem
tale than a real problem report.
There are two systems:
1. old, slow, i386, UP, 7-STABLE
2. new, fast, amd64, MP, 6.3-RELEASE
Systems are located at different physical locations.
What is common between them:
1. they both have the same backup strategy
2003 Apr 11
14
PATCH: Forcible delaying of UFS (soft)updates
Here's a patch against 4.8-RELEASE kernel that allows disk writes on
softupdates-enabled filesystems to be delayed for (theoretically)
arbitrarily long periods of time. The motivation for such updating
policy is surprisingly not purely suicidal - it can allow disks on
laptops to spin down immediately after I/O operations and stay idle for
longer periods of time, thus saving considerable amount
2008 Sep 21
3
UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY
Sep 21 08:57:54 belle fsck: /dev/ad4s1d: 1 DUP I=190
Sep 21 08:57:54 belle fsck: /dev/ad4s1d: UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY.
Ok, so I ran fsck manually (even with -y), but yet it refuses to clear/fix
whatever to the questions posed as fsck runs. What does this all mean?
Thanks,
-Clint
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner,
2013 Aug 29
2
gmirror crash writing to disk? Or is it su+j crash?
So I have a system running:
FreeBSD walk.dclg.ca 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 # r254952: Wed Aug 28 03:02:55
EDT 2013 root at walk.dclg.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/STRIKE i386
and it has two 2T SATA disks. To keep this post short, the crash.txt is
here.
https://uk.eicat.ca/owncloud/public.php?service=files&t=fea9d25579fe0c4afb808859e80e1493
now curiously, while running a "make -j4
2002 Feb 03
1
[wietse@porcupine.org: Re: syncronous directory operation for linux (ext2)]
There's a big thread about filesystems on postfix-users@postfix.org
Could you shed some light on that issue?
----- Forwarded message from Wietse Venema <wietse@porcupine.org> -----
From: wietse@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema)
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 07:53:26 -0500 (EST)
To: Lawrence Greenfield <leg+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Cc: Wietse Venema <wietse@porcupine.org>,
2002 Feb 04
2
ext3 and chattr +S on postfix spools
Postfix <http://www.postfix.org> does a chattr +S on its spool directory
when it is installed on Linux.
This is what is written in the postfix startup script
--
#
# LINUX by default does not synchronously update directories -
# that's dangerous for mail.
#
if [ -f /usr/bin/chattr ]
then
CHATTR="/usr/bin/chattr +S"
else
CHATTR=echo
fi
--
Is this still required on ext3 ?
2008 Aug 02
3
7-STABLE, gjournal and fsck.
Hi,
Recently I've decided to play with gjournal. Main reason was a
promise of avoiding full fsck check after unclean shutdown. I've
successfuly configured gjournal on existing filesystems (all UFS). And
then it happened - my system had a power failure. After boot, it
forced me to run fsck manualy. Nothing special, I did it before... But
this time it failed on gjournaled disks.
2005 Jun 03
1
Problems of performance between linux and freebsd
Dear All,
I posted the following message to the Freebsd-questions mailing
=================================================================
<snip>
On my laptop I've being using linux for some years now and "landed" at last
to
the gentoo distribution which I tuned for working with the statistical
software R and the bunch of TeX programs such as latex, pdflatex, context
and
2003 Jun 08
2
sub-directory 'hung' ...
'K, not sure how/what to debug here ...
doing a grep of svr1.postgresql.org in /proc/*/status shows all the
processes 'stuck' in inode ...
/proc/38750/status:inetd 38750 2072 2072 2072 -1,-1 noflags 1055120147,191009 0,0 0,592 inode 0 0 0,0,0,2,3,4,5,20,31 svr1.postgresql.org
/proc/38752/status:inetd 38752 2072 2072 2072 -1,-1 noflags 1055120154,886433 0,0 0,637 inode 0 0
2002 Sep 30
4
problem with Samba in domain
Hello!
I have a samba fileserver (Debian Woody, Samba 2.2.3a) that I am
trying to join into an NT domain (smbpasswd -j ...); the command says that
it joined the domain successfully.
Then I setup security=domain, workgroup name etc. as outlined in the samba
howtos. However whenever I try to access a share on the Samba server I am
prompted for a password (even though I already logged in through
2006 Sep 12
1
samba with ldapsam: first "net join" always fails, second succeeds
Created an "add machine" script that basically looks for an unused
uid/rid, and then creates a stub LDAP entry for the machine; the first
time I issue "net join", the script is invoked and creates the LDAP entry
correctly, but the join operation fails nevertheless:
f1sa:~# net -U winadmin join
winadmin's password:
[2006/09/08 10:19:40, 0] utils/net_ads.c:ads_startup(191)
2004 Mar 10
5
unexpected softupdate inconsistency
Hi there,
System is FreeBSD 4.9 Stable
Had a problem during a portupgrade that when portupgrade did some
cleaning a directory could not be deleted because it were not empty.
However, it was empty. rm -rf didn't help either.
Because I didn't know what to do I decided to boot.
At system startup fsck was started which produced the message: unexpected
softupdate inconsistency and also that
2008 Sep 30
5
GELI partition mount on boot fails after 7.0 -> 7.1-PRERELEASE upgrade
I was using a GELI partition for /usr/home on 7.0, so it attaches and mounts
on boot. The problem is it stopped working after the system was upgraded to
RELENG_7/7.1-PRERELEASE. Here's how it goes:
I have the following /etc/fstab:
/dev/ad0s1b none swap sw 0 0
/dev/ad0s1a / ufs rw 1 1
/dev/ad0s1d
2010 Jul 13
1
winbind and authentication with local accounts
Hi everyone,
I have a problem with my samba and winbind configuration:
before I switched the config (from local user authentication to AD authentication using winbind) my users were able to authenticate for example as ?peter?. Now, after switching, they are forced to use SAMBASERVERNAME\peter. If they use only ?peter? winbind tries to authenticate them against the AD which fails. Is there a way
2001 Dec 06
2
Terminal Services are extremely slow!
Hi there,
I've been trying to run Terminal Services using wine and it seems to work
but it's sloooow. I'm running dual boot system with Caldera Workstation 3.1,
Windows2000 Professional and Wine 20011106.
Any ideas or success stories?
Here some output lines:
wine --winver win2k "MTSC.exe"
fixme:imm:ImmAssociateContext (0x00010025, 0x00000000): stub
2010 Jul 19
1
packet loss on ixgbe using vlans and ipv6
Hi,
I have a Dell T710 with 4 X 10G ethernet interfaces (2 X Dual port Intel
82599 cards). It is running FreeBSD RELENG_8 last updated on July 13.
What I see is packet loss (0 - 40%) on IPv6 packets in vlans, when the
machine is not the originator of the packets.
Let me try to describe a little more. If a neigbouring machine ping6 it,
there will be packet loss. If it act as a router for ipv6,
2010 Feb 21
2
3.3.10 <-> AD 2008 R2 very slow
Hi again,
I changed from 3.4.5 to 3.3.10 after an AD upgrade to 2008R2 and prinitng
is working mor ore less but it is incredibly sloooow. My server has no
remarkable load so it is not due to hardware bottlenecks. Are there any
ways to 'tune' 3.3.10 or any tricks to make it faster ?
cheers
~christoph
--
/* Christoph Beyer | Office: Building 2b / 23 *\
* DESY