similar to: samba2.0.6 write errors

Hello all, This my first mail in this list. We have succesfully setup a samba server at our 1st attempt, next we go in another site and try the same things but now it seems we got it all wrong! The facts: we have a linuxbox (named enlogic) (REdHat 7, kernel 2.2.18, samba 2.0.7)and one winbox win98se (named ndemou). Our workgroup is localenlogic. No other PC (not even a Hub because we've

Hia, I have a problem using the %G parameter. At the end if my smb.conf file I have something like: include = \etc\smb.conf.%G At this way I hoped that according the the group, I can load a configuration file accoring the the users group. Instead that a 'smb.conf.it' group is loaded, a samba tries to load 'smb.conf.nogroup' (guest account is uid=nobody gid=nogroup) WHat I

Hi: I am running Samba 1.9.17 at SUN Solaris 2.6 and it works well. After I upgrade Samba 2.0.3 or 2.0.5a, my Excel spreadsheets got trouble. In the Samba log file I got: [1999/08/23 10:45:32, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(570) write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe Anybody has an idea what is the problem? I

I have 2 subnets. Subnet 1 has an NT WINS server. Subnet 2 has a Samba server acting as domain master browser and local master browser for a workgroup. If I view the network neighborhood from a Win 95 PC on Subnet 1 (call it PC_A), I can see all the hosts in the workgroup on both subnets. If I view the network neighborhood from a Win 95 PC on Subnet 2 (call it PC_B), I cannot see PC_A. I

Jason Haar <Jason.Haar@trimble.co.nz> wrote: | Well I've just had a crash last night, and I've copies the log files off. | But I see nothing to suggest what happened. Also I've enabled core-dumps, | and no core dump exits, even though smbd died... | | If you look at the smb.conf file, you'll see I've put in a HUGE sleep | statement to be called via "panic

I am having problems with Samba. Things have been working I think but they aren't now. We have 2 class C addresses, one doesn't seem to be having as many problems as the other. When folks on the 207 side try to connect to Samba shares they can usually but right now are failing and getting a network busy error. The file called log. which appears to be a system log file for samba says:

can someone with more samba knowledge then me tell me what this means in my log file? [2000/06/28 16:37:31, 1] lib/util_sock.c:client_name(997) Gethostbyaddr failed for 192.168.0.1 It doesn't appear to be a problem with samba itself but rather the way I have my network setup? any help would be appreciated.. the reason being I am having random connection problems with my cleint windows2000

Hi, I've the following problem. samba 2.0.3 runs on a sun. The security is server. The PDC is a NT-machine. Sometimes when users try to connect to a share they get the answer the password is incorrect. After a restart of smbd all works fine. Has anybody an idea???? regards Eckhard --------------------------------------------- Fraunhofer Institute Factory Operation and Automation (IFF)

Hi everybody, I'm writing for an any help. I tried some news groups about linux etc... nothing :-( On our normaly working network unexpectly starts this problem. Win clients don't see smb server. See logs below: log.nmb [2002/03/11 09:37:33, 1] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(757) Netbios nameserver version 2.0.10 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1994-1998 [2002/03/11 09:37:33, 0]

Greetings. Is there something up with Samba and RedHat, or with recent kernels, or with some packages that have been updated recently? A lot of us seem to see the same login errors with samba and I have yet to get my windows clients to login to my new samba server. The log messages really don't help. I had an old server running Samba 2.0.7 (RedHat 5.0 upgraded to nearly 5.2 with 2.0.33).

Well, I WAS puzzled by this persistent error. Then I stumbled onto something and I might have fixed it. It looks like with an XP client, XP might be trying to renegotiate which port to talk (445 or 139) over at the start of every transaction. Whichever one answers first is used for the rest of the transfer. I added this to smb.conf and restarted samba: smb ports = 139 I can't tell if

I did a make deinstall and a reinstall to upgrade samba from 3.0.9 to 3.0.11 last night at the office i work at and now i get this in the logs. I am sure this has been asswered 100 time on this list but no one can connect to the shared drives. This leave everyone point very angry fingers at me so please help here is the output of the logs. [2005/03/10 12:18:20, 1]

I have a samba server at ip address aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd I can connect to it from clients on subnets aaa.bbb.eee. and aaa.bbb.fff. I can't connect to it from clients on ggg.hhh. smb.conf has hosts deny = all hosts allow = localhost, aaa.bbb., ggg.hhh. The client can successfully 'ping mysambaserver' (resolves to aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd). Doing 'net view \\mysambaserver' fails with

Panagiotis Malakoudis wrote: > > Here is my problem. I have a slackbox running samba 2.0.6 > that uses an NT wins server. I also have a DNS on linux. > Whenever my dns failes (for some reason) hosts that have no > entry on the DNS server but are indeed found on the wins > cannot connect to the samba server. They get "The network is > busy" and the smb log files

Hi all, here's hoping you can help with a problem I have got. I am currently running samba 3.0.7-1 on a Suse 9.0 system and I am having the following problem. I am trying to get my samba server to join a windows NT4 domain called BVFL-DOM and then use winbind to get user names from that domain to be use samba. The samba box joins the NT domain without a problem and I can use NT server

doing something wrong by not registering our workstations with a DNS? I have been searching through the documentation today without finding anything relevant on the subject. When our PC's are configured via DHCP to use our caching only DNS, will they start looking up machines on our local network using DNS and forget everything about WINS and broadcast? It worked just perfectly for nearly

My problem is that I suddenly can't access my linux samba shares from XP or 98. It's worked all week and now - nothing. This also happened about one week ago, then returned to normal function almost by random. I can see the NetBIOS name in the correct workgroup, but not browse it or access any of its shares directly (\\linux\data for instance). I am running my network with a Cisco ADSL

> I have a network that sporadically give 'network busy' errors. One morning > the workstations will all connect up fine and stay up throughout the days > work, yet the next day there is not one machine that can log on to the > network. It may run fine for two weeks, then bam, three days of no logins. > Yet the internet works fine. Could I copy my smb.conf file and rpm -e

Hi, I have installed SAMBA 2.0.6 on Slackware 7.0.After minor troubles with differences of SAMBA 2.0.5a package the SAMBA itself seems to work O.K. But SWAT doesn't work at all. After authentication in web browser IE5.0 I only get an error message. As to /etc/inetd.conf I have changed the line for swat properly. Can someone help me ?

Hi, I'm seeing problems with an NT box accessing Samba 2.0.6 running on NetBSD 1.3F. The exact same setup accessing Samba 2.0.5a running on NetBSD 1.4 works just fine. Specifically, I have one of the shares mapped to a drive letter on the NT box and when I use NTEmacs to open a file on the share, it takes upwards of a 60 seconds to open the file. During this time, the smbd process