similar to: nobody uid printing, take 2

Hi, Background info: running samba 2.0.5a on Solaris 2.6 Security = share This is the printer share definition, note no guest or public definition. [printers] comment = All Printers browseable = no # Set public = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print path = /var/spool/samba printable = yes createmode = 0700 Basically the situation is this: I used to have the

Hi R-users, I have a list containing numeric tables of differing row length. I want to make a new list that contains only rows from tables with a "Sum" greater than 3, plus the names of each table. I was wondering whether there is an elegant way to do this using apply of related functions as this list has many thousands of such tables. Here is an example of the list $AACS

Hello ZFSland, Is there any significance in the fact that the bandwidth/read figures for a simple cpio into a ZFS filesystem should be multiples of 21.3K (when non-zero) as follows? What could determine this figure? Do I need to read a manpage? ;-) Thanks... Sean. ----- [root at global:/36g2] # zpool iostat 3 capacity operations bandwidth pool used avail read

# uname -a Linux testbox 2.6.18-194.el5 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 21:52:39 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux # rpm -qa|grep zfs zfs-test-0.5.2-1 zfs-modules-0.5.2-1_2.6.18_194.el5 zfs-0.5.2-1 zfs-modules-devel-0.5.2-1_2.6.18_194.el5 zfs-devel-0.5.2-1 # zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT pool1 120K 228G 21K /pool1 pool1/fs1 21K 228G 21K /vik [root at

Hi, im trying to attach another volume aka disk to win HVM, however it doesn''t seem to work: + xm block-attach win2008ss phy:/dev/zvol/dsk/pool1/win2008ss.dsk2 \ hdd:disk w 0 results in: elkner.sol ~ > + xm block-list win2008ss --long (0 (vbd (uuid 7cb8fadf-619d-dde6-bda9-dcc18023c7d5) (bootable 1) (devid 768) (driver paravirtualised)

I have just upgraded my jumpstart server to S10 u2 b9a. It is an Ultra 10 with two 120GB EIDE drives. The second drive (disk1) is new, and has u2b9a installed on a slice, with most of the space in slice 7 for the ZFS pool I created pool1 on disk1, and created the filesystem pool1/ro (for legacy reasons). I them moved my data from the original disk0 UFS file system to pool1/ro. Initially I

Howdy All, I''ve a bit of a strange problem here. I have a filesystem with one snapshot that simply refuses to be destroyed. The snapshots just prior to it and just after it were destroyed without problem. While running the zfs destroy command on this particular snapshot, the server becomes more-or-less hung. It''s pingable but will not open a new shell (local or via ssh) however

Hi all, I have 2 questions about ZFS. 1. I have create a snapshot in my pool1/data1, and zfs send/recv it to pool2/data2. but I found the USED in zfs list is different: NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT pool2/data2 160G 1.44T 159G /pool2/data2 pool1/data 176G 638G 175G /pool1/data1 It keep about 30,000,000 files. The content of p_pool/p1 and backup/p_backup

Can anyone confirm my action plan is the proper way to do this? The reason I''m doing this is I want to create 2xraidz2 pools instead of expanding my current 2xraidz1 pool. So I''ll create a 1xraidz2 vdev, migrate my current 2xraidz1 pool over, destroy that pool and then add it as a 1xraidz2 vdev to the new pool. I''m running b130, sharing both with CIFS and ISCSI (not

SAMBA WEIRD PRBLEM, PLEASE HELP!!! this is my environment: SERVER runnning Centos 3.1 with all the updates applied, sharing files using samba, rpm version 3.0.4, release 6.3E Clients running Mandrake 10.0 Download edition with all the patches applied, clients to the file server mentioned above. Samba is version 3.0.2a, release 3mdk Here is my server smb.conf files **********SMB.CONF START

hi there, I'm following these documentations to add a file-based disk volume to a KVM guest under Centos 6.0 : http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Virtualization/chap-Virtualization-Storage_Volumes.html as instructed, I created a "pool" then a "volume", file-based, e.g : mkdir /mnt/raid/kvm_pool1 virsh # pool-define-as pool1 dir - - - -

On 02/11/15 17:08, Thomas Werschlein wrote: >> On 02.11.2015, at 16:25, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Well he didn't write what I asked for, can you please post your entire smb.conf, please do not use testparm, please post as is (although you can sanitise any sensitive info) > Sorry, missed that part. Here we go. > Regards, Thomas

> On 02.11.2015, at 16:25, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Well he didn't write what I asked for, can you please post your entire smb.conf, please do not use testparm, please post as is (although you can sanitise any sensitive info) Sorry, missed that part. Here we go. Regards, Thomas [global] available = yes smb2 leases = yes

Hi, ZFS experts, From ZFS release notes, " Solaris 10 6/06 and Solaris 10 11/06: Do Not Place the Root File Systemof a Non-Global Zone on ZFS. The zonepath of a non-global zone should not reside on ZFS for this release. This action might result in patching problems and possibly prevent the system from being upgraded to a later Solaris 10 update release." So my question is, do we

Again... Global ONLY smb.conf options: unix extensions = No allow insecure wide links = Yes Per share ONLY smb.conf options: ## and share options niet global used. wide links = yes follow symlinks = yes unix extensions are enabled =>> wide links are disabled automaticly. Set : allow insecure wide links = Yes I dont see it in you smb.conf.. wide links = yes

Hi all, I am planning to improve virtualization in my company. So I have already a pool named p.e. Pool1. I have 5 servers Dell PowerEdge 1950 in it. Now I have 4 servers Dell PowerEdge 2850 too. Can I add 2850 to Pool1? I can''t find anything about compatibility for different hadrware in new release. -- Best regards, Den. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing

I think the issue may be related to the broken trusts. First of all only two people had specifically reported issues which meant for most people it was acceptable. Then I noticed that some directories seemed slower than others. If I ssh'd into the server and checked permissions, listing permissions on most directories was quick (under 2 second.) On directories that allowed

I''ve just pushed vdiskadm translate to the 3.3 vdisk repo. You can now translate data from one virtual disk data type to another without creating a virtual disk. This allows the user to use a vmdk file and directly translate the data into a zvol without having to import it first to a vdisk and then export it to the zvol. # vdiskadm help translate translate - translate virtual disk data

Hi, when installing windows server 2008 Std hvm I get always a blue screen telling me: ''a clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within the allocated time interval'' I googled around and found, that this occured with vista as well: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-changelog/2007-01/msg00170.html Config is: + virt-install --name=win2008ss

Hello, I had snv_111b running for a while on a HP DL160G5. With two 16GB USB sticks comprising the mirrored rpool for boot. And four 1TB drives comprising another pool, pool1, for data. So that''s been working just fine for a few months. Yesterday I get it into my mind to upgrade the OS to latest, then was snv_127. That worked, and all was well. Also did an upgrade to the