similar to: RPC error on Windows NT4.0 clients

Hi, I have a CentOS 6.4 box running SerNet Samba 4.0.9 as an AD DC replicating from a W2k3 box. If I run "gpresult /s OLDDC /user MYDOM\Me" on a command prompt on OLDDC, I get a normal output, listing which GPOs are applied. If I run "gpresult /s NEWDC /user MYDOM\Me" in the same place, I get "ERROR: The RPC server is unavailable." This is after a fresh restart

Hai MJ, ( gelukkig nieuwjaar he .. ;-) ) First, why sernet 4.2.5 current is 4.2.7 Upgrade to 4.2.7 first i suggest. And : Last attempt @ Wed Nov 11 <= 11 Nov ? latest really? The "misbehaving server" check the time first. Try to run : knit Administrator samba-tool drs replicate <destinationDC> <sourceDC> --full-sync -k reboot your server, check time, check

I could really use some support with this. I understand it's always possible to just restore from a backup but the more interesting question is if something can be done with the data at hand. Basically, I'm trying to understand how it's possible that a dbcheck shows no errors, an ldbsearch is successful, and yet it's not possible to start the AD properly. What else is there that

Looking at the Windows Server Event Viewer, I find this error: The Remote Desktop license server could not be registered as a service connection point in Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS). Ensure that there is network connectivity between the license server and AD DS. To register the license server as a service connection point in AD DS, use Review Configuration in the RD Licensing

Hi, We have three DC's, and one of them has been misbehaving a few times lately, stopping to replicate, showing the following error in samba-tool drs showrepl, for all DC partitions: > DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com > Default-First-Site-Name\DC2 via RPC > DSA object GUID: 5e93a102-2963-496a-af16-0c51eebb2e31 > Last attempt @ Wed Nov 11 06:41:21 2015 CET

The two systems I'm referring to are on different domains, different locations. No connection whatsoever except me being the one administering both. According to oEMInformation the server was provisioned by 4.3.3. I just checked the Samba log file and it seems that version 4.7.4 was running before the update. I'm now looking at the logs right before the upgrade and indeed, there have

Am 23.08.2016 um 15:36 wrote Heinz Allerberger via samba: > Hello there, > > I have a problem with replication between two domain controllers, dc1 > and dc2. > Distribution: Debian 8.5 > Samba-Distribution: sernet-samba 4.3.11-14 > > The replication on dc2 working fine without any failures. > But the synchronization on dc1 gives the failure "WERR_BAD_NETPATH".

I recently installed Samba-2.0.6 on my machine. I copied the smb.conf over from another, working machine that I just got rid of. Anyway, I can't seem to get things working. Here are some files: when I 'restart' nmb in SWAT ---(log.nmb): Netbios nameserver version 2.0.6 started. [2000/02/02 13:33:19, 1] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(747) Netbios nameserver version 2.0.6 started. Copyright

Hi Folks, I've been using linux for the past 4 years. I'm currently running RH 6.2 and samba 2.0.6. My goal has been to eliminate MS from my computer and I'm almost there. I'm trying to use samba to allow printing to my printer from other W95 & W98 computers. I've read the HOWTOs and generated the smb.conf file which is at the end of this message. I used the [test]

Security pundits have been warning about the dangers implicit with Web services for years. A good starting point for understanding the security issues related to Web services can be found at: http://searchwebservices.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid26_gci872720,00.html Of course to really understand the security risks posed by Web services, you need to understand the basics of Web

Let's see I've got a network about 10 PCs running XP and 1 running Linux. I had setup Samba and it was running like a charm. XP pcs could access linux box through network neighborhood and access 2 shared dir and edit/change files. Really not sure what has gone wrong. I am using Samba 2.2.8a I run both smbd and nmbd as daemons. When I run ps -aux they show up. root 1553 0.0

Try : apt-get remove libbsd-dev restart samba, now is the message gone? Gr. Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens BasSamba via > samba > Verzonden: woensdag 15 maart 2017 16:09 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] samba: setproctitle not initialized, please either call >

Hello, I'm new to this list. The NT folk here, are concerned about some timeout errors and stuff that appear in their event viewer. They are building a case to convince management that unless these "samba" errors are fixed, we should move to NT file shares. I think this is a bad idea. Can anyone help me out here. We are running samba 2.0.6 (1st msg) and 2.0.5a (2nd err msg)

-----Original Message----- From: BasSamba [mailto:bassamba at rediffmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 12:17 PM To: 'L.P.H. van Belle'; samba at lists.samba.org Subject: RE: [Samba] samba: setproctitle not initialized, please either call setproctitle_init() or link against libbsd-ctor. Hi, Tried, It says "not installed" below is the result

On Fri, 2017-03-17 at 12:16 +0530, BasSamba via samba wrote: > Hi, > Tried, It says "not installed" below is the result To be clear, for this particular solution you need to now rebuild and re-install samba from source, as removing the -dev files has no impact on already built binaries. Thanks, Andrew Bartlett >

Dear All, I've seen the PRINTER_DRIVER.txt doc on getting the PRINTER$ share set up to automatically add printer drivers to Win95 clients. It explicitly says that the procedure described does not work for NT4.0 clients. I can't find any other documentation on setting up a PRINTER$ share suitable for NT4.0 or NT2000 clients either in the distribution (2.0.5a) or the web site. Is this

I am seeing an odd behavior with NT4.0 SP3 workstations trying to rename files on Samba 1.9.18p2 shares on SunOS 4.1.3 servers. Rename, whether it is run from Explorer, winfile.exe, or command prompt fails with "Access Denied I don't see the problem from Win95 PCs at all, and I don't have the problem with shares from Samba 1.9.18p2 shares on Solaris 2.5.1 servers using identical

Dear List, When we copy an ascii file from SunSolaris Samba server to NT4.0 workstation, the file is getting control characters at the end of each line. Appreciate, if any clue given to solve this problem. Regards.

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, I am writing to ask your help with a problem whereby 3 NT4.0 + Sservice Pack 3 servers frequently log (in their event lists) that the browsing service cannot get the list of domain resources (the reply to NetServerEnum2) from the master browser (when the boxes are functioning as backup browsers). The situation is :- . NT machines browsing on both NetBUEI and NetBT

Hello, everyone. Could you help me to solve the problems? Recently I downloaded samba-2.0.4b souce and after I compiled it, I used it as a replace of samba-1.9.18p8. The smb.conf file was used as before. But there are two problems to me. 1)When I used samba-1.9.18p8, the Windows NT4.0(sp3) workstation can browse the share names of Japanese SJIS, but now I couldn't access the shares because