similar to: Case changes when overwriting existing files

I am trying to save some graphical output including a legend in the Windows Enhanced Metafile (EMF) format. This fails when xyplot() is used rather than plot(). Here is a simple example: require(lattice) a <- c(1:10) b <- c(2,4,5,2,3,5,7,8,9,5) # Output can be saved (or copied to the clipboard) as a Windows EMF image file # from the Graphics Device output window. plot(a , b)

Does anyone have a work-around for a failed installation of this package? > library(xlsReadWrite) xlsReadWrite version (cran shlib) Copyright (C) 2010 Hans-Peter Suter, Treetron, Switzerland. !! Your installation contains the cran placeholder shlib (dll/so). Please get the regular shlib (420 KB) by executing the following command: xls.getshlib() However, the xls.getshlib() command fails

Hello, i have a little problem on OS5. On CentOS4 vi an vim are the same programs. On 5 vi have no syntax highlighting while vim have it. Whats wrong? Greetings, Sebastian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL:

I have been building 2.0beta5 on a SCO OS5 box using ggg 2.7.1 and get the following error (every time rpc_msg.h is included). Compiling smbd/connection.c In file included from /usr/include/rpc/rpc.h:42, from include/includes.h:317, from smbd/connection.c:22: /usr/include/rpc/rpc_msg.h:54: parse error before `1' *** Error code 1 (bu21) The problem is with

Hi, What is wrong with listening to the stream using HTTP on port 8000 on your server? And what is wrong with using VLC? /Denis :-) On 22 May 2014, at 22:47, Guido Budack <glaivy at yandex.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi folks, > > actually and once again quite busy I'd really appreciate a quick hint > or explanation... >

Denis Caron wrote: >>We seem to be experiencing some problems with Samba 2.0.6 on SCO Unix >>Openserver 5.0.5. >> >>I'm wondering if anybody else is using this version of Samba on SCO. I used >>an older version 3 years ago and rarely had a problem. I just installed this >>version and am experiencing an annoying problem: >> >>We use

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi folks, actually and once again quite busy I'd really appreciate a quick hint or explanation... Somehow I dont get it... :-/ Although I'll soon (as soon I have a more powerful server - actually a friend of mine is hosting my site in a small cluster) install and use the icecast-server for my streaming-purposes I don't understand how to

It built just fine in mock, results here http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/tmp/mtr6/ -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Digimer" <lists at alteeve.ca> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Sent: Tuesday, 8 March, 2016 00:05:59 > Subject: [CentOS] Can anyone compile

I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was asking if anyone tried building it themselves and, if so, did they have the same issue as I describe below? Alternatively, any tips/advice on solving my build issue would be helpful. digimer On 07/03/16 07:29 PM, Nux! wrote: > It built just fine in mock, results here > http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/tmp/mtr6/ >

Ah... I searched for half an hour for this function... you know, the help function in R could really be a lot better... But wait a minute... looking at this, it appears you have to pass in an expression. What if it is an unknown function, where you only have a handle to the function, but you cannot see it's implementation ? Will this work then ? -----Original Message----- From: Berton Gunter

Hi all, I was trying to rebuild mtr (http://vault.centos.org/6.7/os/Source/SPackages/mtr-0.75-5.el6.src.rpm) and I keep getting: ==== Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.gu9Ds0 + umask 022 + cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD + '[' /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/mtr-0.75-5.el6.x86_64 '!=' / ']' + rm -rf /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/mtr-0.75-5.el6.x86_64 ++ dirname

Hi, I have been trying to do numerical differentiation using R. I found some old S code using Richardson Extrapolation which I managed to get to work. I am posting it here in case anyone needs it. ######################################################################## richardson.grad <- function(func, x, d=0.01, eps=1e-4, r=6, show=F){ # This function calculates a numerical approximation

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1957 Bug #: 1957 Summary: New -K option overwites output file Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.9p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh-keygen AssignedTo:

On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > >> On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>>> Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca>: >>>>>

On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > >> On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: >>> >>>> On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>>>> On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster

On 08/03/16 02:08 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 8 March 2016 at 19:02, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > >> On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: >>> >>>> On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>>>> On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer <lists at

On 8 March 2016 at 19:13, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 08/03/16 02:08 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 8 March 2016 at 19:02, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > > > >> On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > >>> On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On

On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > > > >> On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > >>> On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> > >> wrote: > >>>

On 8 March 2016 at 19:02, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > > > >> On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > >>> On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On

On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca>: > >>> I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was