similar to: Client not cleared from browslist with browse list sync

Rudolf Kollien email: Rudolf.Kollien@medas.de Rudolf.Kollien@kollien.de *************************************************************************** Never trust a operating system you have no sources for *************************************************************************** Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions.

Hi Federico, many thanks to you. This patch helped me too. Do you know the intention of the original changes by the samba team in ipc.c. I don't think, it is a good idea to store all profiles in an separate directory and the user registry in the home path. Thanks again Rudolf Rudolf Kollien email: Rudolf.Kollien@medas.de Rudolf.Kollien@kollien.de

Signed-off-by: Scott Seago <sseago at redhat.com> --- src/test/functional/host_controller_test.rb | 41 -------------------- .../functional/managed_node_configuration_test.rb | 14 ++++--- src/test/functional/nic_controller_test.rb | 8 ---- src/test/functional/permission_controller_test.rb | 15 ++++--- src/test/functional/quota_controller_test.rb | 2 +-

I think, it's a good idea to control the binds of the smbclient as it's possible on smbd. Rudolf Kollien email: Rudolf.Kollien@medas.de Rudolf.Kollien@kollien.de *************************************************************************** Never trust a operating system you have no sources for *************************************************************************** Buying an

Ok, the story is this, I''m running an Unreal Tournament 2004 server. It''s running on a system that has two external NICs that are connected to different ISPs. I would like players to be able to connect to the server from either link. My default gateway goes through NIC1. For traffic through NIC2 to work I simply added an extra routing table and rule. The extra routing table has

Hello everyone, can someone please tell me if the configuration previously shown is eventually going to work? Stefano Il giorno lun 19 ott 2020 alle ore 18:56 Stefano Vargiu < vstefanoxx at gmail.com> ha scritto: > I add some additional information I didn't give in my previous email, > specifically how I tried to force DC1 and DC2 to contact each other only > with their VPN

I encountered an bug in samba 2.0.7. With the config option "logon home = \\%N\%U\profile" in smb.conf and roaming profiles, smbd panics when the share "%U" is not listed in smb.conf. I had some users for which i forgot to enter the accompanying share in smb.conf. When such a user logged in or logged off, smbd paniced with signal 11. While on logging off the profiles where

I have a problem browsing in my subnets let me explain me situation: I have a m0n0wall (FreeBSD based router software) with 3 nics. nic1:My WAN connection Nic2:My LAN connection (192.168.0.0/24 m0n0 is DHCP) Nic3:My Wifi connenciot (192.168.1.0/24 m0n0 is DHCP) just using ip-adresses acrossed the network is no problem. now i want to use windows browsing works on LAN but can't see the

Hi James, we use some NFS mounted shares on our Linux-SCO-network. Samba runs on the linux box. The linux server mounts some NFS shares from the SCO server. The access error should not be a samba failure. Make sure that the directory above the mountpoint is accessable for user nobody (chmod o+x , if you upgrade to samba > 1.9.18p7 make sure that there is read permission on the directories too:

I add some additional information I didn't give in my previous email, specifically how I tried to force DC1 and DC2 to contact each other only with their VPN IPs. I did so using dnsmasq as a DNS proxy. # DC1 configuration IP NIC1: 172.16.0.2 IP NIC2: 172.20.0.1 IP VPN: 172.19.1.173 --- /etc/resolv.conf: search domain.local domain domain.local nameserver 172.19.1.173 --- I configured dnsmasq

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 7:42 AM Stefano Vargiu via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I'm trying to add a second DC to a Samba 4 AD: they both have multiple NICs > and for this reason cannot find a way to make it work. > They communicate through VPN and both have one of the bound interfaces set > to the same IP address, 172.20.0.1, which

On 19/10/2020 12:40, Stefano Vargiu via samba wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm trying to add a second DC to a Samba 4 AD: they both have multiple NICs > and for this reason cannot find a way to make it work. > They communicate through VPN and both have one of the bound interfaces set > to the same IP address, 172.20.0.1, which doesn't allow me to route to the > correct

Hi, is it possible to have 2 different ISP in one server? i have 2 NIC cards im going to config ISP1 in NIC1 and ISP2 in NIC2? what should be the configuration for this setup? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070412/4c62019f/attachment-0004.html>

Hello everyone, I'm trying to add a second DC to a Samba 4 AD: they both have multiple NICs and for this reason cannot find a way to make it work. They communicate through VPN and both have one of the bound interfaces set to the same IP address, 172.20.0.1, which doesn't allow me to route to the correct DC, and that is only part of the problem. Here is the configuration: *

hello all, I have been trying to set-up bridged network with VLAN and not able to succeed as many tutorials address only single NIC. I am trying to setup 2 guests (backtrack instance) each guest has NIC1 and NIC2. following is snippet for guest1 I am not able to get 192.168.0.2 address back on guest eth0. VIRT-MANAGER GUI : guest1-lan details radio button left side panel NIC1

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Boris Epstein <borepstein at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello there, > > What is the hypervisor that hosts the VM? What does ifconfig show on it? > > Boris. > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On 11/06/2016 11:00 PM, Sean Son wrote: > > > >> How do I

Hi, I've just joined the list because of questionnaire in the forum [1]. The hardware is AMD-V(IOMMU) capable and is enabled in the BIOS with 3 NICs. I currently have host Windows 2008 R2 installed but binds (network services and protocols) on NIC3 only. My guests on VMWare workstation (has bridged network service bound on all 3 NIC) has bridged 3 NICs for the guests where NIC1 is WAN, NIC2

samba does the SMB(!) authentication against machine "a" but you MUST have equal users on ALL machines. How else should samba create files on the unix file system if there is no UNIX user to deal with? It is not a problem of samba, it's a "problem" of unix. The only trick to do this would be to create a dummy unix user and do a "force user" to this dummy on every

libvirt-users@redhat.com TCP Tunnel Info I've been looking at the TCP Tunnel network feature as a potential replacement for the extra private internal networking configuration file. Usecase: This network is supposed to go from VM1 to VM2 without DHCP, DNS or any incoming/outgoing connections to the host or outside world possible. https://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsNICSTCP *

I have a strange problem on one machine where eth0 gets killed when I add a virtual interface. It's got something to do with the NIC ordering or with the xen network script having a problem with multiple NICs and virtual interfaces. I could need some help/comments on this. Some history: I added a NIC (chip identifies as Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit