similar to: FW: Microsoft Visual Dev Studio

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "FW: Microsoft Visual Dev Studio"

2004 Jun 30
1
Microsoft Access & Samba 2.0.3 - Can't open database
Hello Friends, Does anybody have the solution to the problem reported by Richard below? Is anyone else having problems using Microsoft Access97 to access database files via Samba 2.0.3? When I attempt to open the Access database from my unix account via Samba, I get the Microsoft message: Microsoft Access was unable to open the Visual Basic porject for this database. Another
1999 Apr 14
0
Microsoft Access & Samba 2.0.3 - Can't open database
Is anyone else having problems using Microsoft Access97 to access database files via Samba 2.0.3? When I attempt to open the Access database from my unix account via Samba, I get the Microsoft message: Microsoft Access was unable to open the Visual Basic porject for this database. Another user is saving the project now. Do you want to retry? retry cancel There
1999 Sep 10
1
MS Visual Developer and Samba
I am running samba-2.0.3-8 on Redhat 6.2 in five global locations. All are fine except one. In this location when a user runs MS Visual Developer they are able to open, save compile and edit files just fine. However when they type either [Enter] or [Bkspc] to add or delete a line, in this case only MSVD hangs for several seconds. Insert several lines and wait 1+ minutes!!! I have watched the
2004 Jul 06
1
FYI House bill exports analog phone regs to VoIP
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 00:31:21 -0400 From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com> To: politech@politechbot.com Subject: [Politech] House bill exports analog phone regs to VoIP http://www.politechbot.com/docs/boucher.voip.bill.070604.pdf There's a new bill in the House of Representatives to regulate phone calls made over the Internet. It was
2009 Jan 27
3
Microsoft Access MDB database on Samba share
I'm having problems using Microsoft Access 2000 mdb files on a Samba share. The same database worked very well on a Windows server. I had hoped Samba would be a drop in replacement for a Windows server but apparently Access needs special Samba configuration. In Access I sometimes get Run-time error '3035': System resource exceeded. I don't see any errors in the log file when
2002 Sep 03
0
Question about fileNET
Hi, I've a question about a problem using a samba share in a UNIX AIX server. In my scenarious there is a fileNET server (running on a win2000 server) which use a samba share on a AIX sever for cacheing file, this share is configured for allow access to a particular user (pangol). It seams that user have access permission but an error is returned when fileNET try to write a file. Thanks in
2013 Oct 29
2
Problem Building opus-1.0.3 on Microsoft Visual Studio 2012
I am using mvs 2012 but the .sln provided is of msv 2010 so on opening .sln it tries to update libraries which is successful but I am unable to build (compile) it as it gives series of errors. I am pretty new to these things so can anyone tell me if I am doing anything wrong or how to create(.lib and .dll) files so I can use them in my project. Please forgive me if I have asked something foolish.
2013 Oct 29
0
Problem Building opus-1.0.3 on Microsoft Visual Studio 2012
On 2013-10-29 2:39 PM, Akshit Jain wrote: > Thanks a lot for replying. This is the output > >>------ Build started: Project: celt, Configuration: Debug Win32 ------ > 1> fatal: No names found, cannot describe anything. > 1> The system cannot find the file C:\Users\user\Desktop\mUOn\Audio. > 1> #define OPUS_VERSION ""=">
2007 Mar 09
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio
I just wonder that Visual Studio .NET 2003 is the most compatible one among various MS Visual Studio versions for LLVM. Thank you Seung Jae Lee
2007 Mar 10
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio
It is, if only because it's the version I use, but 2005 is supposed to work also. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that it doesn't due to recent STL issues. Versions prior to 2003 won't work. Seung Jae Lee wrote: > I just wonder that Visual Studio .NET 2003 is the most compatible one among various MS Visual Studio versions for LLVM. > > Thank you >
2007 Mar 10
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 23:40 +0100, Andreas Fredriksson wrote: > On 3/10/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > > It is, if only because it's the version I use, but 2005 is supposed to > > work also. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that it > > doesn't due to recent STL issues. Versions prior to 2003 won't work. > >
2007 Mar 10
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio
No, the problem with StoreSDNode was that an argument as being called Value, which hid the class Value later on in the argument list. This also broke 2003 and was fixed a while ago. _WIN32_WINNT is not supposed to be predefined, so that warning shouldn't be occurring. I have never seen it myself, and a predefined value could be inappropriate. Most of the other changes seem to be about
2007 Mar 12
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio
On 3/12/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > Just to make clear, there are no problems building 1.9 with VS 2003, nor > are there any problems as I write this. I'm fairly sure we grabbed the 1.9 tarball off the website, but I could be wrong. > That's what we do. We define it in llvm/lib/System/Win32/Win32.h, which > in included by every file that uses the
2007 Mar 17
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio
Can Microsoft Visual Studio be a good tool for making a backend for an architecture? Thanks, Seung ---- Original message ---- >Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:44:48 -0700 >From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio >To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >Andreas Fredriksson wrote: >>
2007 Sep 20
0
[LLVMdev] Building with Microsoft Visual Studio
Richard Smith wrote: > I am working on a port of LLVM targeting a proprietary VM. Thus far > development has been under Linux and Cygwin. Cygwin licensing would appear > to require that LLVM built under Cygwin would have to be released under the > GPL, so alternatives are being investigated. > > Using MS Visual Studio and following the instructions at >
2007 Sep 20
0
[LLVMdev] Building with Microsoft Visual Studio
On 9/20/07, Richard Smith <richard.smith at antixlabs.com> wrote: > Many thanks. Yes, this question has slightly sidetracked on the license > issue, which was mostly an aside as to why we wish to use something other > than Cygwin. > I totally understand. :-) I just wanted to bring it back on a technical track. > On the make issue, I am very interested to know what it is
2011 Jan 10
1
[LLVMdev] Current state of the (new) CBackend & LLVM/clang with Microsoft Visual Studio
Hi. I am interested in using the CBackend of LLVM. I have read about the problems with the current version and that David Greene has started a reimplementation. Can you tell me about its current state? Furthermore, I use Microsoft Visual Studio. The "Getting started with MVC" documents for release 2.8 say "To emphasize, there is no C/C++ front end currently available" but
2012 Dec 28
0
[LLVMdev] JIT crashes Microsoft Visual Studio 2012 when Disassembly Window opens
Microsoft Visual Studio 2012, or 2012 with Update 1, intermittently (90% of the time in my case) crashes when the "Disassembly Window" is opened at the address of JIT code generated by LLVM. This happens when either entering the address into the address bar of the Disassembly Window, or stepping into JIT code that opens the Disassembly Window. Microsoft has acknowledged the crash to
2009 Nov 20
0
call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x90060): Currently not implemented
Hi, We have a large (8 CPUs, 32GB RAM) x86 Sun server running x8664 Debian Lenny, with Samba 2:3.2.5-4lenny6. It's a BDC and file server. I have noticed various entries in the log files that I'd like to understand better. Some machines are generating this: [2009/11/16 15:10:49, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2019) call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x9005c): Currently not implemented.
2007 Mar 12
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio
Andreas Fredriksson wrote: > On 3/11/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: >> No, the problem with StoreSDNode was that an argument as being called >> Value, >> which hid the class Value later on in the argument list. This also >> broke >> 2003 and was fixed a while ago. > > Ok, I didn't know that. We've been using the 1.9 tarball