similar to: FW: Microsoft Visual Dev Studio

I am running samba-2.0.3-8 on Redhat 6.2 in five global locations. All are fine except one. In this location when a user runs MS Visual Developer they are able to open, save compile and edit files just fine. However when they type either [Enter] or [Bkspc] to add or delete a line, in this case only MSVD hangs for several seconds. Insert several lines and wait 1+ minutes!!! I have watched the

Hello Friends, Does anybody have the solution to the problem reported by Richard below? Is anyone else having problems using Microsoft Access97 to access database files via Samba 2.0.3? When I attempt to open the Access database from my unix account via Samba, I get the Microsoft message: Microsoft Access was unable to open the Visual Basic porject for this database. Another

Is anyone else having problems using Microsoft Access97 to access database files via Samba 2.0.3? When I attempt to open the Access database from my unix account via Samba, I get the Microsoft message: Microsoft Access was unable to open the Visual Basic porject for this database. Another user is saving the project now. Do you want to retry? retry cancel There

I am using mvs 2012 but the .sln provided is of msv 2010 so on opening .sln it tries to update libraries which is successful but I am unable to build (compile) it as it gives series of errors. I am pretty new to these things so can anyone tell me if I am doing anything wrong or how to create(.lib and .dll) files so I can use them in my project. Please forgive me if I have asked something foolish.

On 2013-10-29 2:39 PM, Akshit Jain wrote: > Thanks a lot for replying. This is the output > >>------ Build started: Project: celt, Configuration: Debug Win32 ------ > 1> fatal: No names found, cannot describe anything. > 1> The system cannot find the file C:\Users\user\Desktop\mUOn\Audio. > 1> #define OPUS_VERSION ""=">

I just wonder that Visual Studio .NET 2003 is the most compatible one among various MS Visual Studio versions for LLVM. Thank you Seung Jae Lee

It is, if only because it's the version I use, but 2005 is supposed to work also. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that it doesn't due to recent STL issues. Versions prior to 2003 won't work. Seung Jae Lee wrote: > I just wonder that Visual Studio .NET 2003 is the most compatible one among various MS Visual Studio versions for LLVM. > > Thank you >

On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 23:40 +0100, Andreas Fredriksson wrote: > On 3/10/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > > It is, if only because it's the version I use, but 2005 is supposed to > > work also. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that it > > doesn't due to recent STL issues. Versions prior to 2003 won't work. > >

No, the problem with StoreSDNode was that an argument as being called Value, which hid the class Value later on in the argument list. This also broke 2003 and was fixed a while ago. _WIN32_WINNT is not supposed to be predefined, so that warning shouldn't be occurring. I have never seen it myself, and a predefined value could be inappropriate. Most of the other changes seem to be about

On 3/12/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > Just to make clear, there are no problems building 1.9 with VS 2003, nor > are there any problems as I write this. I'm fairly sure we grabbed the 1.9 tarball off the website, but I could be wrong. > That's what we do. We define it in llvm/lib/System/Win32/Win32.h, which > in included by every file that uses the

Can Microsoft Visual Studio be a good tool for making a backend for an architecture? Thanks, Seung ---- Original message ---- >Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:44:48 -0700 >From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio >To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >Andreas Fredriksson wrote: >>

Richard Smith wrote: > I am working on a port of LLVM targeting a proprietary VM. Thus far > development has been under Linux and Cygwin. Cygwin licensing would appear > to require that LLVM built under Cygwin would have to be released under the > GPL, so alternatives are being investigated. > > Using MS Visual Studio and following the instructions at >

On 9/20/07, Richard Smith <richard.smith at antixlabs.com> wrote: > Many thanks. Yes, this question has slightly sidetracked on the license > issue, which was mostly an aside as to why we wish to use something other > than Cygwin. > I totally understand. :-) I just wanted to bring it back on a technical track. > On the make issue, I am very interested to know what it is

Hi. I am interested in using the CBackend of LLVM. I have read about the problems with the current version and that David Greene has started a reimplementation. Can you tell me about its current state? Furthermore, I use Microsoft Visual Studio. The "Getting started with MVC" documents for release 2.8 say "To emphasize, there is no C/C++ front end currently available" but

Microsoft Visual Studio 2012, or 2012 with Update 1, intermittently (90% of the time in my case) crashes when the "Disassembly Window" is opened at the address of JIT code generated by LLVM. This happens when either entering the address into the address bar of the Disassembly Window, or stepping into JIT code that opens the Disassembly Window. Microsoft has acknowledged the crash to

Andreas Fredriksson wrote: > On 3/11/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: >> No, the problem with StoreSDNode was that an argument as being called >> Value, >> which hid the class Value later on in the argument list. This also >> broke >> 2003 and was fixed a while ago. > > Ok, I didn't know that. We've been using the 1.9 tarball

Hi Richard, > Unfortunately, I believe the issue is not that Cygwin contains GPL code, it > is that applications which it compiles do. This is explicitly stated at > http://cygwin.com/licensing.html: > If you have serious questions about the licensing of Cygwin/LLVM, you really need to talk to a lawyer. No one on this list can give you advice in that area which will accurately reflect

I successfully build llvm from cvs using vs2005 and stlport. I also had a couple of issues, but most were due to outdated project files. I also had to implement code for the alloca instruction. On 3/10/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > > The recent issues concern the head revision, post 1.9. As no one has > ever submitted patches to fix 2005 problems with the 1.9

On 3/11/07, Reid Spencer <rspencer at reidspencer.com> wrote: > Could you submit the patch? We could make sure that 2.0 doesn't have the > same problem. Sure, I can't test this from where I am now but if anyone can take it for a spin to test it and verify the fix then by all means check it in. I'm just providing a hand-edited diff from our vendor branch here (1.9 tarball

The recent issues concern the head revision, post 1.9. As no one has ever submitted patches to fix 2005 problems with the 1.9 release, it is safe to say they still exist. Andreas Fredriksson wrote: > On 3/10/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: >> It is, if only because it's the version I use, but 2005 is supposed to >> work also. That being said, I