similar to: Setting Read-only attributes from Win95 on FreeBSD

After about a day and a half or so of uptime, I'm getting the aforementioned panic on the server ... better then having it hang solid, but right now I'm not sure if this is replacing it, or just one being triggered earlier then the other ... First scan through Google, I came across some posts talking about NMBCLUSTERS ... since its at the same settings as my other server (the default)

neptune# ps -M vmcore.1 -N kernel.debug -axl | grep inode | wc -l 961 and I have a vmcore to work on here !! :) (kgdb) proc 99643 (kgdb) bt #0 mi_switch () at machine/globals.h:119 #1 0x8014a1f9 in tsleep (ident=0x8a4ef600, priority=8, wmesg=0x80263d4a "inode", timo=0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_synch.c:479 #2 0x80141507 in acquire (lkp=0x8a4ef600, extflags=16777280,

Today my system coredumped (4.8-STABLE from Saturday), I believe it's somehow X11 related: X11 crashed first (signal 11). I was running it as root (I know I shouldn't). I didn't think about it and restarted X11. While it was starting, I had a look at the console, there was a bright white message: issignal. This shows up at X11 startup. Then the system coredumped. Below is more

Hello list, I have been fighting this problem for a few days now. I have changed memory and opened the case and monitored for heat. I have been getting the same panic about every 12 to 24 hours. I can let the system sit idle, or run it under a heavy load (cpu and disk), but the panics dont seem to be related to system load. It looks to me like a dangling pointer in softdep_update_inodeblock,

Just trying to understand if anything might be going on with this crash dump or just faulty hardware ? dmesg at the end ---Mike # gdb -k /kernel.debug vmcore.0 GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD) Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type

Not sure what all to do, but doing a 'gdb -k kernel.debug /dev/mem', a backtrack on one of the processes shows ... server has been up 12 days now, and running a June 8th kernel ... #0 0x20f4f0 in ?? () (kgdb) proc 67258 (kgdb) bt #0 mi_switch () at machine/globals.h:119 #1 0x8014a1f9 in tsleep (ident=0x8a3d2200, priority=8, wmesg=0x80263d4a "inode", timo=0) at

Hello. I'm having a 4.7Rp9 server which is since months quite unstable, so I've compiled a debug kernel and got a crash dump. I'm a programmer and I know a little how to use gdb, I'm not so expert about FreeBSD kernel insides however, so I can't get much from it. Any kind of help is appreciated. This is the crash message: IdlePTD at phsyical address 0x0032f000 initial pcb

Author: swilcox Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 063e12129ee21a72ae625b3e10b3169e8906fe77 Log message: 6238533 UFS O_DSYNC Logging Performance Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c

Author: rbourbon Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: a40f0552fb65649aa4c6751b7dfa343fad066ef8 Log message: 4849565 smallfile too small - change to 64 bit 6207772 UFS freebehind can slow application performance due to text segment paging 6279932 35% drop in SPECweb2005 Support workload performance from snv_07 to snv_08 Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c

Hi stable, nice you see you again. I was one of those guys who was seeing constand panics on 24 hour boundaries but couldn't provide a backtrace due to the ar device not taking a dump. I installed a dedicated drive just to take the dump, and then didn't have a panic for a couple weeks. Now, I am back with, and I have traces to share. The first two, from 2003-09-27 and 2003-09-28

Right now, FreeBSD supports one type of ACLs - so called POSIX.1e ACLs. They are natural extension of the traditional Unix permissions, and for a long time were the only nonproprietary ACL type in Unix systems. Times change, and now there are several problems with them: they never actually become standard (the draft they are based on was withdrawn); this results in minor incompatibilities

Author: praks Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 4c3b7ab574cc73502effa96c11c293e04fd54309 Log message: 6256083 Need a lightweight file page mapping mechanism to substitute segmap 6387639 segkpm segment set to incorrect size for amd64 Files: create: usr/src/uts/common/vm/vpm.c create: usr/src/uts/common/vm/vpm.h update: usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWhea/prototype_com update:

Hi, all-- I've got a 1997 Dell XPS D300 which has been rock-solid over the years, which I'd just upgraded via a PowerLeap iP3/T-1400C. The system seemed stable for several days, so I cvsup'ed and updated this machine from 4.7p10 to 4.8-STABLE, only to get a panic a few hours later. Can anyone make an educated guess as to whether the panic below is related to this upgrade, or

Hi, I use samba for one year only, but with full satisfaction. Only with latest cvs tree I discovered some (maybe particular) problem. In mixed environment of win95oemII and NT4 workst (sp3 or sp4) we share some Paradox 7.0 database on linux server (Rh5.2 and 2.2.0-pre1 kernel). Paradox controls multiuser access to the data with three files: PDOXUSRS.NET (user names etc?), and two lock files,

Some more crashes of 4.8-RELEASE. Lets see what do I have today: # ls -l /var/crash total 1576676 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2 Jul 30 13:31 bounds -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2193252 Jun 25 17:30 kernel.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2193252 Jul 4 00:08 kernel.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2193252 Jul 15 19:28 kernel.2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2193252 Jul 16 17:50 kernel.3

Listmates, In 8 years, since 2.02 (I think), I have never seen this behavior out of samba. I run a stand-alone server with WinXP clients. Somehow a legal assistant created (not intentionally mind you) files and directories with ACL attributes set: -rwxrwx---+ 1 cyndy ochiltree 21504 2008-10-28 16:48 AUTHORIZATION - employment.doc* -rwxrwx---+ 1 cyndy ochiltree 12804 2008-10-28 16:48

Hi, I have a CentOS 6.4 fileserver running SerNet Samba 4.0.9 with these global settings (not overridden): read only = No force create mode = 0777 force directory mode = 0777 inherit acls = yes inherit owner = yes inherit permissions = yes On a Windows client, I have Thunderbird 24.0 storing its profile and mail on the Samba share. The

I just run webalizer manually on an Apache log, like I have done many times before. Some new statistics were created, but for "August 2006" instead of "August 2008". I cannot figure why! Because of my mistake, the webalizer statistics for this site have not been updated since February. Now I tried to update them for the first time - with the results I described above. The

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello there, i have a new problem with my samba :-). i'd created a new user in the OpenLDAP. Then i joined the Domain and tried to browse in the homedir of the new user. Here are the rights under Linux: [16:27:52] jens@saphira:~ > ll total 1.8M drwxrwx--- 7 jens Domain Users 632 May 14 16:27 . drwxrwxrwx 15 nobody root 360 May

Hi I am accessing files in a ZFS file system via NFSv4. I am not logged in a root. File permissions look as expected when I inspect them with ls -v and ls -V I only have owner and group ACLs...nothing for everyone. bash-3.00$ id uid=100(timt) gid=10001(ccbcadmins) bash-3.00$ groups ccbcadmins staff bash-3.00$ ls -v testacl -rwxrwx---+ 1 timt ccbcadmins 0 Jan 31 16:24 testacl