similar to: dynamic dns updates from WINS

[Note: This has been posted to linux-kernel and was ignored. Since smbfs is maintained by the samba team, I am retrying here] Hi! To maintain and install packages from CD-ROM to my Debian/GNU Linux system, I use Debian's apt package. Since my Linux box is stowed away in a closet, I use an smbfs mount to mount the CD-ROM drive from my Windows desktop machine to the Linux box. This used to

This is the list of problems I had with samba-2.0.6 so far. Can anyone tell me if he can reproduce them and if he considers them as problems? 2.0.6 on linux 2.2.13 or 2.0.33 1) sighup/log reopening doesn't always work: connections that are already active keep logging to the old logs; logrotate rotates/zip the logs and samba stops logging completely till restart. 2) Localized chars. I have

Hello all. I''m the tech writer at XenSource, Inc., and I''ve been asked to ride herd on getting the revised Xen 3.0 User''s Manual put together, reviewed, etc. We are targeting a review draft for 11/21 and it would be great if any significant additions or changes that any contributers might be making could get checked in before then so the review process can be as

Hi there, could anybody out there make a statement to when the new samba version is gonig to be released??? I do need it pretty urgently because of a file locking problem on a glibc 2.1 system... and I do need to know whether it's going to be out soon or I'll have to wait some - which would mean having to install another system in the meantime.... Bye, Jan

I'm sure that I'm not the first person to begin integrating SAMBA's WINS server abilities and the new BIND 8 'dynamic' DNS functionality. I downloaded the sample copy of "dns_update" by Stephen Rothwell <sfr@linuxcare.com> which provided a good starting point for creating the interface between Samba 2.0.6's WINS update notification and dynamic DNS updates.

I've just released a snapshot of 2.0.6 in the alpha directory on samba.org. This is intended for testing to make sure some of the recent changes work well on a wider range of sites. I have also built a RedHat Linux 6.X RPM and put it in the same dircetory. If you are not running a mission critical site then we would appreciate feedback on this snapshot. If you have reported a bug in Samba

On 11/12/17 10:22, Thibaut Perrin wrote: > Hello Fabien, > > First, thank you for even trying for what seems to be an impossible task :( > > Quick points :? > - if it was decided not to continue, what would happen to the current > wiki ? Dismantled or would it remain as read-only for documentation > purpose ? > - What about Sphinx

Hi, I'm wondering how to setup my DNS server (BIND 9.1.1) to read a zone from my wins.dat file. Is there a script I can use, or is there some other way to do it? I'm a linux newbie so a lot of info helps! Thanks, Jeff Nichols -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

For a couple of years people have been reporting intermittent problems with rsync over ssh freezing during a large transfer (typically several GB). I have now gotten to the bottom of these problems, and have written a small test program which demonstrates a deadlock in sshd when doing large bi-directional transfers. Luckily the problem is easily solved by modifying sshd to use socketpair() instead

Unknown ----- Original Message ----- From: <samba@samba.org> To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA <samba@samba.org> Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 10:37 AM Subject: SAMBA digest 2249 > SAMBA Digest 2249 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) Re: redhat->nt printing problem after

Hi, Do I actually need a 'path' entry for each printer share defined in my smb.conf? Or is 'path' redundant in this case as the only relevance it has would be for the printing spool directory, which is defined by my /etc/printcap for all my printers anyway?? The man page for smb.conf seems to suggest that I do need a path entry, so should this be the same as the spool directory

On Samba 1.9.18p10 and previous versions, each of the multiple users on the same Windows Terminal Server Edition machine would get their own smbd process. With Samba 2.0.x (I'm currently testing 2.0.4b), this has changed so that every user on a WTSE machine uses the same smbd process. File ownerships are assigned correctly, but file locking does not work. If one user on a WTSE machine has a

it's all in the title : what's next for wiki.centos.org ? As a reminder, current wiki.centos.org instance is powered by moinmoin (https://moinmo.in/) but quite an old version (moin-1.5.8-3.el6.noarch) Recently I had a quick look at trying to update/upgrade that version to something newer/supported, but it's a nightmare : the data conversion just kill the target server (oom) and no

Hey, digest 2286 incomplete, only first 3 topics contained. Can I get a new copy ? Thanks, Hans-Joerg Glock > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: samba@samba.org [SMTP:samba@samba.org] > Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 27. Oktober 1999 22:12 > An: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA > Betreff: SAMBA digest 2286 > > SAMBA Digest 2286 > > For information on

On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Billy Bob <billysbobs at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 10, 2019 1:43 PM, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 19:09:01 +0000 (UTC) > >Billy Bob via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > >> > >> As

On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 20:12:17 +0000 (UTC) Billy Bob <billysbobs at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Friday, January 11, 2019 1:39 PM, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > There doesn't seem to be anything really wrong there,the only really > > difference between your named.conf and mine is that I have: > >  > >    

samba.org has moved and has a new IP address. You may find that some services are inaccessible until your local name server fetches the updated records. That should happen fairlly quickly, but please be patient. This affects the machines samba.org, cvs.samba.org and all email. The machine is now located in the Linuxcare offices in Canberra, Australia. It was located at the Australian National

On Friday, January 11, 2019 10:44 AM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Billy Bob <billysbobs at yahoo.com> wrote: >> Here is what the logs show WITHOUT the -d option: >> >> Jan 11 10:00:36 dc01 dhcpd[1704]: Commit: IP: 172.20.10.165 DHCID: >> 1:d4:be:d9:22:9f:7d Name: mgmt01 Jan 11 10:00:36

Hello, I want to set up my Samba-servers to use encrypted passwords (smbpasswd). First I enabled "Update Encrypted" to set the correct password and then I disabled "Update encrypted" and enabled "encrypted passwords". When I map up a share from the client everything is working ok, but in the log I have the following: [1999/11/09 21:37:10, 1] smbd/password.c:(532)

Hello, I'm using samba2.02 and shadowed passwords. I' m on the way to migrate from plaintext to encrypted passwords. Therefore I've set the parameter update encrypted to "Yes". After everyone has logged in I will set this parameter to "No" again and set encrypted passwd = Yes. So far, so good. But three questions are remaining for me: a) what to do with those who