similar to: HELP! multiple subnets/ network neighborhood browsing

I have managed to get it set up so that I can now use net commands to mount shares from my linux box onto my windows box. But I still don't see an icon for my linux box on the network niehborhood. I have waited and waited and tried what seems like everything but can't get that stupid icon to come up. Any ideas??? Scott

I have a network which consists of two subnets, each with a linux server providing Samba services. With the configuration listed below, I have successfully achieved Subnet B being able to browse Subnet A but, Subnet A cannot browse Subnet B (sharename not found). Is it a Samba configuration issue or is it DNS? (I have it fixed if I put an /etc/lmhosts file on Linux Server A that has the host

I have a rather unusual setup within which I'd like to run samba. At this point I have: a) 3 networks (all private IP's) b) net1, net2 are interconnected by a router. net1 has a host that also acts as a WINS server and is local master, domain master, preferred master for it's group. (linux slack7.0, samba 2.0.5) router between net1, net2 has an IP in each network and samba

Hello, I''m trying to setup an 8 port wan configuration (pptp+pppoe) with one vlan trunk. My internal networks are : LAN(eth9): 10.0.0.0/16 VLAN10(eth9) 10.10.0.0/24 VLAN20(eth9) 10.20.0.0/24 VLAN30(eth9) 10.30.0.0/24 VLAN100(eth9) 10.100.0.0/24 I would like to post my configuration here since i don''t success to do the following: 1. Communicate between VLANxx to LAN

Hi list, my samba server is connected to 2 networks. In one network this machine is just a simple workstation (the lan of our building), but in the other network (my private network) i would like it to be the PDC, have different shares, and have a different name, etc. My current setup (excerpt) is this: NET1 = 192.168.1 #External NET IP1 = 192.168.1.34 #External IP NET2 = 192.168.2

A CentOS 6.3 box ("host") runs several KVM virtual machines, each of which has two interfaces attached to the two bridges br1 and br2 (and each thus has two IP's; one on 192.168.0.0/22 and one on 192.168.4.0/22); net.ipv4.ip_forward on the host is 1. Simplified diagram: host +---------------+ |

Hello, My name is Fermín Galán and I''m currently working with IPSec tunnels. Recently, I was setting a IPSec tunnelling sample scenario (maybe the simplest one :), where I observed some strange behaviour that I like to describe in the list, just in the case somebody knows what can be the cause, please. The scenario involves four hosts configured in the following way:

Let me clarify my question, I am using unmodified stock qemu (1.4.0) and only the location of vhost file descriptor is different from default (I don't remove the default /dev/vhost-net directory) The VHOST file descriptor is present in "/dev/vhost-0" directory instead of the default "/dev/vhost-net". When I try to give vhostfd in the XML I get a different error:

Hi all, I need my servers to decide which network they are in (i.e. dmz), and the only clue is the servers IP-address. I was trying to accomplish it like this, but it doesn''t work: case $ipaddress { "10.1.1.*": { $network = "net1" } "10.2.2.*.*": { $network = "net2" } "10.3.3.*": {

Hi, I can''t get traffic shaping working. This is my situation: -------- ------ Net1 ----- |router| -------------------- | TC | ----------- Net2 -------- leased line ------ eth1 eth0 We use the leased line for normal traffic but also for synchronisation between 2 servers. The leased line is 2mbit. The synchronisation

Hi guys, I have a mail server running qmail with two network interfaces. All packages comes from the first one and I want to mark outgoing packages to route them using the second interface (ADSL). I have write this script, but it ins''t work. All packages are returning by the first interface... :-( x-x-x # Tables, networks, interfaces, addresses and gateways IF1=eth0 T1=100

Hi, CONFIGURATION: the important part of my setup looks like that (smb.conf): [global] interfaces = net1 net2 net3 net4 net0 ; this is a router which acts as cross-subnet domain master + wins ; server local master = yes preferred master = yes domain master = yes wins support = yes dns proxy = no os level = 99 net1 - net4 are Win95, WinNT, Linux net0 are two samba-1.9.18p1 fileservers

Hi all, i got the following configuration: * NET1: DSL Line with /28 network, let''s call it 10.1.0.0/28 * NET2: DSL Line with /28 network, let''s call it 10.2.0.0/28 * INTNET: Internal Network with productive servers and workstations, 192.168.1.0/24 Obvisiously the 10er networks are official networks but censored to protect my customer. The routerbox assigns on eth0 all

Hello, In my network I have a Samba Server (Domain=DN) and 3 Windows 98 WorkGroups (Net0, Net1, Net2). And my problem is: I want to avoid same users to access the workgroup Net0 (Data and Applications), and others users to the Net1. The Net2 is public for all users. It's possible to do it with a Linux Samba Server? How can I do it? Tia, Sociedade Torreense de Inform?tica, Lda. Av.

​The qemu that I am using isn't modified at all. It's the VHOST drivers that are mounted elsewhere i.e., not on default /dev/vhost-net. Here is the command that I use to launch my qemu VM: qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu host -boot order=c -hda /root/Disks/ubuntu1.qcow2 -m 1024M -smp 2 --enable-kvm -name 'client 1' -nographic -vnc :2 -net none -no-reboot -mem-path /dev/hugepages

I am working on something that works with freeswan. If you are interested, I would be glad to send a copy and the details. -----Original Message----- From: shorewall-users-request@shorewall.net [mailto:shorewall-users-request@shorewall.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:01 PM To: shorewall-users@shorewall.net Subject: Shorewall-users digest, Vol 1 #105 - 3 msgs Send Shorewall-users mailing

I have a router with 3 network interfaces like in the following ASCII diagram below. All interfaces are 100mbit. There is tcp traffic being sent from net1 to net3 and from net2 to net3 and the tcp connections consume as much bandwidth as possible. There is a pfifo queue on the egress interface eth0 of the core router with a limit of 10 packets. net1 --> (eth1) router (eth0) -> net3

Hi! I have read all informations i could find, but some things are still not clear. My setup is: ---INTERNET1(eth0)-\ /- Local net1 (eth2) GW ---INTERNET2(eth1)-/ \- Local net2 (eth3) I have NAT and a working setup using HTB,SFQ, classifying with the iptables -j CLASSIFY way. I shape only the traffic coming from the internet heading to the intranet. I would like

I am running KVM on Centos 6.3 and am seeing an unexplained shut down of two guests. The libvirt package was upgraded to libvirt-0.10.2-18.el6_4.4.x86_64 at the time of the shutdown. Only the two guests shown below was affected, while 9 others running on the same hypervisor were not. Can some one help me to find the cause please ? Regards Chandana GUEST #1 ======== 2013-04-10

Hello, I have wrote some scripts to shape about 1000 workstations. My config: Pentium IV - 2GHz, 1Gb RAM, RedHat Enterprise Advanced Server 3, kernel 2.4.21-9.EL, iproute-2.4.7-11.30E.1 2 Gigabit Lan cards in bridge mode. I use htb. Everything work fine, but I have troubles with showing running configuration. # Init shaper root for dev eth0 tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 2: htb default 200