similar to: No luck with "UNIX password sync"

I'm configuring Samba 2.0.3 for win95/98 clients (~20 workstations) and everything was going great for the first 10 or 12. Now when I access certain subdirectories of my share from the Win machine, everything nearly hangs. I say nearly because the mouse will still move sort of. It creeps along at about a pixel a second. It continues to get worse until I just have to cold boot the workstation.

Ok, I've tracked down the problem I've had bootstrapping llvm-gcc. The culprit is in TreeToLLVM::EmitMemCpy: void TreeToLLVM::EmitMemCpy(Value *DestPtr, Value *SrcPtr, Value *Size, unsigned Align) { const Type *SBP = PointerType::get(Type::Int8Ty); const Type *IntPtr = TD.getIntPtrType(); Value *Ops[4] = { CastToType(Instruction::BitCast,

Hi, I am trying to write a LowerCALL() function for my (custom) target ISA. All I need to do is map a CALL instruction directly onto an SDNode that takes an equal number of arguments (very much alike intrinsics, except that these are custom to my target.) I do not need to implement any call sequences, stack frames etc. I get the following assertion failure: llc: LegalizeDAG.cpp:834:

Hello, This patch fixes bug 4882. Regards -Jakub -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pr4882.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 6856 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090907/266f900c/attachment.obj>

Hi Evan, On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 10:17 -0800, Evan Cheng wrote: > Hi Nickhil, > > The Legalizer expects lower'd call is the node that produce the same > number of values as the non-lowered node. That's what the assertion > is checking. > > Take a look at the LowerCall routine for any other targets. You will > see that in the non-void function case, it

Evening, I was writing some code that tried to insert calls to the llvm.annotation intrinsic function, which has a signature of (i32, i8*, i8*, i32). The code is below. void addAnnotation( BasicBlock *block, Function *F) { string foo = "foo"; string bar = "barr"; Type *charTy = Type::getInt8Ty(block->getContext()); ArrayType *s1Ty =

Hi, I am new to R (I have most of my experience in SAS and SPSS). I was wondering if anyone has used both Resampling Stats and R, and could comment on strengths/relationships. Also, I have no clue on how to do the various examples from the book "Resampling: The New Statistics" in R. Can anyone give me some possible starting points? Or websites/books? Thanks, Brandon

Hello All I have looking for any specific answer for one thing. I have a virtualized Server with only one physical interface eth0 (WAN). To run OpenVPN i need to use DHCP server. And here is the question: is there a chance to run DHCP server on eth0:0 interface? Or it is impossible ? Thanks in advance. -- /Best Regards *Greg*/ UML Professional (Cert #251574932)

Hi Nickhil, The Legalizer expects lower'd call is the node that produce the same number of values as the non-lowered node. That's what the assertion is checking. Take a look at the LowerCall routine for any other targets. You will see that in the non-void function case, it returns a MERGE_VALUES, i.e. all the results merged along with the chain. Cheers, Evan On Nov 15, 2006, at

Hi Jakub, looks good. > + LLVMContext *Context = &SI->getContext(); I guess this could be LLVMContext &Context = SI->getContext(); which means you can use Context rather than *Context below. > - const Type *Ty = Type::getInt64Ty(SI->getContext()); > - MemSetF = Intrinsic::getDeclaration(M, Intrinsic::memset, &Ty, 1); > + const Type *Tys[] =

On Sep 7, 2009, at 5:02 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jakub, looks good. > >> + LLVMContext *Context = &SI->getContext(); > > I guess this could be > LLVMContext &Context = SI->getContext(); > which means you can use Context rather than *Context below. Right, C bad habit ;) Fixed. >> - const Type *Ty = Type::getInt64Ty(SI->getContext());

Andrew Ruef wrote: > Evening, > > I was writing some code that tried to insert calls to the > llvm.annotation intrinsic function, which has a signature of (i32, > i8*, i8*, i32). The code is below. > > void addAnnotation( BasicBlock *block, Function *F) > { > string foo = "foo"; > string bar = "barr"; > > Type

Hi, I'm trying to use exception control by LLVM. In the demo page, I got : declare i8* @llvm.eh.exception() nounwind But, when a try to emit the code by llvm engine, the name is generate with the sufix .132 ( llvm.eh.exception.132 ) and the Function::getIntrinsicID abort the program. It was so : Intrinsic::getDeclaration(llvm_module,Intrinsic::memset,&Tys,1); Now, it's

Oops. That was premature. I think your original question was on the right track. TableGen distinguishes between known and "overloaded" types (like "llvm_anyfloat_ty" in your example). The overloaded types are numbered separately, and the argument to LLVMMatchType is an index into these overloaded types, ignoring the known types. So, in your case, the first

Hello! I installed Samba2.0.3 on redhat linux5.1/kernel2.2.1. When I type http://127.0.0.1:901 in Netscape, the swat login dialog appears. But eachtime I input root and root's passwd, it tells me authorization failed. who can help me? thanks! Kai Kang -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

Anyone know of a site where I can get a good set of instructions for installation of SAMBA on a Sun 450? ///Chuck/// C. E. Schultz Network Administrator Statia Terminals, Inc Email: schulce@statiaterm.com Phone: (954)698-8251 Fax: (954)725-0264

I still think there is a bug somewhere, but not sure where yet. This is what is generated in intrinsic.gen: case Intrinsic::opencl_math_fdistance: // llvm.opencl.math.fdistance ResultTy = Type::FloatTy; ArgTys.push_back(Tys[0]); ArgTys.push_back(Tys[0]); break; This is the intrinsic definition: def int_opencl_math_fdistance_fast : Intrinsic<[llvm_float_ty],

Hi, I tried creating variable argument intrinsics which are to be placeholders for some instructions which should not be executed by the backend. Kindly help me with the errors in my "migrate_begin" intrinsic creation //Additions made to Intrinsics.td file: def llvm_migrate_begin : LLVMType<iAny>; def int_migrate_begin :

I''m trying to get some answers as to why I (my company actually) would go with RoR over TurboGears. The developer staff is fluent in both Ruby and Python so that is not an issue. Rails is well into its release cycle whereas Turbogears won''t be at 1.0 until later this week. They both do essentially the same thing and they both have cool features unique to themselves

On Feb 19, 2008, at 1:11 AM, aditya vishnubhotla wrote: > Hi, > I tried creating variable argument intrinsics which > are to be placeholders for some instructions which > should not be executed by the backend. > > Kindly help me with the errors in my "migrate_begin" > intrinsic creation > > //Additions made to Intrinsics.td file: > > def