similar to: Samba / NT / Win98 and Browsing

It seems that two copies of my note were posted to the list - my apologies for the mistake. It seems I must also apologize for a second dumb thing. My post was based on a report I received, and was slightly in error. Please ignore the message entitled 'Samba / NT / Win98 and Browsing'. This should teach me to jump the gun. The problem is in fact, already well know it seems - the

I also set up samba 2.0.5a (binaries from Skunkware) on a SCO 5.0.5 server. I have a conf file, but it's on my laptop, and that's downstairs, and I'm about to get ready to leave, so I'll dig it up later. :) From what I remember though, all I changed was: - the workgroup name, - turned off browse master - turned off the printing system - set the guest user to 'nouser'

Hi Guys, This is a strange one. We use Samba on a SCO UNIX Box that shares various files out. If you are on a Win98 system and copy a text document over to the local disk on win98 and then modify the file on a single line from the SCO system and then re-copy that file again to the 98 box it doesn't recognise any difference. It doesn't appear to occur with XP and Linux systems mounting the

Dear all Lets say I have a plain text file as follows: > cat(c("[ID: 001 ] [Writer: Steven Moffat ] [Rating: 8.9 ] Doctor Who", + "[ID: 002 ] [Writer: Joss Whedon ] [Rating: 8.8 ] Buffy", + "[ID: 003 ] [Writer: J. Michael Straczynski ] [Rating: 7.4 ] Babylon [5]"), + sep = "\n", file = "tmp.txt") I would somehow like to read

I have several SCO UNIX system were I would like to install Samba. Some of these machines are running SCO 5.0.7 which comes with a Samba version 2.2, the other machines running SCO 5.0.6 do not have Samba. I would like to upgrade the Samba to V.3 on the newer machines and to be able to install it on the older systems, but I am unable to find out a download from Samba.org for SCO. Could some one

I've installed Samba ("latest") on SCO's openserver 5 with a WIN'95 hanging off of it as a client. I can run every test in DIAGNOSI.txt except for number 2. That is, the WIN'95 box can not ping the SCO box within a reasonable amount of time. (SCO can ping the WIN'95 box fine). For the longest time I thought the WIN'95 box couldn't ping the SCO box but I

For those of you following the IBM vs SCO legal case, you have probably noticed that SCO has said that the GPL is invalid. IBM appears to make the reasonable case that you can't say something is void, and then rely on it. INAL, but why is SCO allowed to distribute Samba without agreeing to the GPL? That's like buying a car, then claiming the sale agreement is bogus but you still want

> -----Original Message----- > From: Kurt Heinrich > Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2000 14:29 > To: 'samba@samba.org' > Subject: Browsing issues NT WS 4.0 and Samba > > Hi Guys/Girls, > > I have recently been trying to implement samba into our environment here > as a replacement for ftp clients. > > What I am finding is that windows explorer (NT W/S 4.0)

Yo Andrew! What version of Openssh are you trying? RGDS GARY On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Andrew McGill wrote: > Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 15:26:53 +0200 > From: Andrew McGill <andrewm at datrix.co.za> > To: djm at ibs.com.au > Cc: gem at rellim.com > Subject: Openssh on SCO Openserver Release 5 > > Hi there > > Your e-mail address appears in the README for openssh,

Yo All! Sorry if this is obvious but I am new to openssh. I have used the original ssh for a while and am familiar with it (and it's restrictive license). I am trying to port openssh-1.2.1pre24 on to SCO UnixWare 7.1.0. I will post the small patches when it is really running. Two problems, SCO has no /dev/random so I installed egd-0.6. It usually works but sometimes dies. I have sent

I think what I need is a prebuilt package. I currently use Samba 2.2.12 running on SCO OpenServer 5.0.6 but I am in the process of upgrading to 5.0.7. Can't move to SCO version 6 because our application isn't guaranteed to work on it. Regards Dave -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Mauricio Tavares

I am using a SCO Unix system version 2.1.2 where I develop some application. This SCO Unix system is connected to a TCP/IP network. On the same segment also a NT 4.0 server is running. This NT server makes each day a backup of some directories on the NT server. what I want to realise is, make a NFS directory on the SCO unix server pointed to the NT server. So that the applications developed on

openssh-2.9.9p2/configure.in says: # Disabled until it works on SCO and HPUX #AC_SYS_LARGEFILE As an autoconf maintainer I'd like to fix this. Can you please explain what's broken on SCO and HPUX? I'm puzzled by the comment, as AC_SYS_LARGEFILE is a feature introduced in autoconf 2.50, whereas openssh-2.9.9p2/configure was built with autoconf 2.13. Anyway, some older GNU

Dears Sirs; I'm tryng to compile and install samba 3.0.14a on a SCO Openserver 5.0.6 server (i want to use some shared printers from MS server2003 on a customer network, but with samba SCO ver 2.2, i can't obtain the authorization from the domain controller to use shared resources), but i'm havig a lot of trouble. I had dowloaded samba-3.0.14a.tar.gz fro Samba.org. I had put all the

Hello Mark, Did you ever solve this problem? I saw your post but no replies. I'm in the exact same situation. If you have any pointers on where to get this I'd appreciate it. - Paul Hess >From: "Mark Mestdagh" <mestdagh@dma.be> >To: "samba digest" <samba@samba.anu.edu.au> >Subject: TCP/IP >Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 21:40:59

If you upgrade to sco 5.0.7, you get samba 3.0.20 5.0.6 had samba 3.0.14. so im wondering why your using samba 2.2.. samba 3.0x. is on the supplimental discs. Gr. Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: dave at anchor-tech.co.uk >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens David Nolan >Verzonden: vrijdag 22 mei 2015 14:12 >Aan: 'Mauricio Tavares' >CC:

There was a patch merged in on 9/29 that changed remove() calls to unlink(): - (djm) Merged big SCO portability patch from Tim Rice <tim at multitalents.net> Does SCO's libc not include remove()? Note that sftp-server.c is currently using remove. The reason I ask is I'd like to keep the portable tree as close to openbsd as possible, and if we need remove() for SCO we should

First let me introduce myself to all the list. My name is Josep and I live near Barcelona. This is my first message to the list (I haven't even read any), and I do not know if it is too easy (my question), or if perhaps it is not possible to do what I'm trying to do. Well, let's begin the interesting stuff and finish all the bla-bla-bla's that most people hate :-D I've

Has anyone here installed samba on sco? I might have to install samba on a SCO 3.2 v 5.0.5 server and was wondering if there might be any complications, I'm used to freebsd so I'm not sure what I'm in for.

Hi, I've just installed a binary version of Samba 2.0.3 on SCO 5.0.5 and am having some problems. I'm basically following "SAMS Teach yourself Samba in 24 hrs" book. On a Win98 machine I can see the SCO machine in the Network Neighborhood. When I try to connect it asks for a passwd and says that the passwd is incorrect when I enter it. It also displays