similar to: Locking problems with Solaris 2.6 and NFS

Chris Hines wrote: > I would like to use samba as an NT domain controller for NT 4 & Windows 9X > and posibly windows 2000. I have configured samba 2.0.7 and samba NTG as > domain controllers and they seem to work. > > We wish our users to use a single password accross UNIX & windows which > are copied from a central NIS map managed by the University. Some time in >

I've been suggested to get some logs and give a brief description of the problem I'm encountering with Cadds5 / Samba 2.0.6 and offer them to you , via http or ftp , to try to find a solution I 've collected the logs , can I send them with a description of the problem Thanks Stefano Colombo ( scolombo@cdmtc.it ) System / Network Engineer CDM Tecnoconsulting SPA v. M.L.King 38/2

Andrew Wilson wrote: | For us the Solaris ACL is being honoured by Samba but can result in less | permissions granted on destination files and directories than the ACL | stipulates, eg. | ACL on a parent directory "test" is as follows:- | mask:rwx | However a file or a sub-directory created beneath "test" will be granted | less permissions for user tuser than desired, eg.

Dear Dave, Doesn't this only work if you're using samba as a domain controller and the client says "net use h: /home" I've not got it to redirect "//server1/username" to "//server2/username" when the NIS map says "user server2:/path/&" Though if it could be done I'd be VERY keen. Tim "David Collier-Brown"

William E. Dent will be away from Wednesday August 30, 2000 to Tuesday September 5, 2000. Mail is being forwarded to wedent@home.com. Original Message Text follows: ---------------------------------------------------------- Send samba mailing list submissions to samba@lists.samba.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

You wrote: > I am writing a news article about the rulings in the cphack and DVD cases > and how they could impact reverse engineering in the United States. > It appears that new interpretations of fair use provisions in copyright law > could force reverse engineering offshore. [We can discuss this in detail in private email, which you may quote freely, but here's an overview

John Wilkes wrote: > I can't get samba to work reliably. Win98 machines can map a network > drive via Samba, but writing large files to the Linux box fails. I get > error messages that all are some variation on this ... > [2000/02/20 22:38:31, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(560) > write_socket(6,39) wrote 39 > [2000/02/20 22:38:31, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(468)

A moderately-frequently asked question is "why do automounted directories in shares disappear?" The old answers were: 1) they timed out and auto-un-mounted, and 2) you shouldn't re-export NFS-imported stuff anyway. A new answer (0) was just suggested by a Sun techie: add a "browse" option to the automounter map entry, to make them appear even when they're not

Denny Lee wrote: > I have a question with using Samba and IIS on NT Server 4.0. Could you ask it on samba@samba.org, please? samba-technical is about internal implementations issues... Of course, having said that, the authentication errrors look as if the web server didn't have permission to read the files Samba provided. Do the Unix permissions on the files include read for

Gregory Hosler <greg@camelot.eno.ericsson.se> wrote: > Everything was running smoothly, and then I applied the solaris "y2k" patches. > Now, most accesses to samba will hang for a minute or 2, before completing. In > the event log I see messages like: > > The redirector has times out a request to <server name> > > This did not used to happen.

Here's a second set of diffs for sanity-checking smb.conf files. This one implements a basic set of checks on netbios names. No, it won't recognize someone using an ip address, but it will realize the dots don't belong: $ testparm Load smb config files from /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf WARNING: netbios name "127.0.0.1" contained a dot, which is only legal in DNS domain

Richard Whiffen <whiffen@ici.org> wrote: > We're having some odd issues with samba and MS Word (And presumable the > rest of the office suite, but I haven't checked) running on NT 4.0 sp3. > > MS Word doesn't seem to obey the umask settings: > create mask = 0775 > directory mask = 0775 We've had that prblem here: many pc apps rename the file to be

Clary Harridge asked... > we are interested in booting Win95 diskless from a SAMBA server. Peter Debus <pdebus@turing.une.edu.au> cautioned | Unfortunately there is no other option I am aware of, other than booting | from an NT server - which I have been told, but have not experienced | myself, is painfully slow if booting a whole computer lab at once, with | clients timing out and

Ken Hamer (B83 131) <K.Hamer@axion.bt.co.uk> wrote > BUT...... After printing a document, Samba appears to hang up the connection, > although another seems to start pretty quickly. ... > server.netbios- client.1065 8557 0 8760 0 CLOSE_WAIT > > The connection will stay in this state until the user tries to access > something on the network drive

You wrote: | The problem that I'm having is that once a file has been opened from the | share, changes made to that file via the WWW interface are not seen by | the Win95 client, they still get the old file's contents. This is an artefact of the so-called ``opportunistic lock'' algorithm, which allows client-side caching unless another pc client attempts to edit the file. You

Mass Sivilotti wrote: > Granted, the Explorer > window is EMPTY (i.e., regardless of the actual contents of > the directory, Explorer shows no files, consistent with > the UNIX permisssion of not allowing searching), but the very fact > that the window opens and the directory APPEARS empty is confusing > some folks. Wouldn't it be better if you got a permission denied >

Bill Eldridge <bill@rfa.org> wrote: > I'm currently testing out some SCSI->IDE RAID 5 systems > (not banging on them too rigorously at the moment, but > no obvious flaws so far). > > Basically, you get a SCSI interface that the computer sees, > but the enclosure holds 3 IDE drives, and the whole thing > snugs into a tower chassis. RAID 5 at about $2200 for >

"Marc Remijn" <marrem@IAEhv.nl> write > When copying files from the Samba server to a Windows95 client or vv, > the speed varies dramatically. When I try to copy the same (20MB) file 10 > times > some times it copies in less than 10 seconds. The next time it takes allmost > a > minute. And most worrying of all quite often the copying just stops halfway > in

A colleague just wrote and said he's had a problem with Samba using a Cascade ("SLS") PDC. This is odd, as Jeremy tested that rather recently! The symptom reported was, with security = domain and password server = <the SLS server>: > . When I try to validate > a login on the samba box against the SLS SAM, I receive the

robert m hazbun wrote: > We now want to implement printer sharing and > accounting using samba as well. You actually wrote to the implementor's list: I've cc'd this to the regular list... > We are looking for a solution similar to the Windows 95 Printer$ share that is > documented on the samba.org site. I'm almost surprised the existing one didn't work.