similar to: New user

I'm working to setup Samba as a domain member to a Windows Server active directory, and I keep hitting road blocks. There's some real terminology hurdles in the wiki. In a nutshell, my problem is this: I setup a Windows 2012 Essentials ADS domain and I ended up with zartman.local for my "domain" in Windows. So, I've got a dns zone in windows server that is domain.local

Hi all. As relates to my previous email today (Samba 3.0.1 windows browsing), I broke out the troubleshooting document called Samba_troubleshooting. I followed through alot of the same steps I had previously though this time I use the following command: smbclient -L pgbc -N I received this message: Anonymous login successful tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE Of course when I

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69827 Priority: medium Bug ID: 69827 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Uneven, jerky mouse movement, increasing CPU usage QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: jimoe at

"Does that help?" No. I am not your private consultant. You need to reply to the list, which I have cc'ed here, not just me. I am still somewhat confused by your specifications, but others may not be. Part of my confusion stems from your failure to provide a reproducible example (see e.g. the posting guide linked below). For example, I cannot tell from your text whether the Abc

Dave, The way I see it there should be just one pass that implements deleting UB (maybe it would come to be called UBCE), and that one pass should have a command line option simply for the reason than all passes should have one. Peter Lawrence. > On Jul 26, 2017, at 10:02 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 9:23 PM

Mehdi, Hal’s transformation only kicks in in the *presence* of UB, and it does not matter how that UB got there, whether by function inlining or without function inlining. The problem with Hal’s argument is that the compiler does not have a built in ouija board with which it can conjure up the spirit of the author of the source code and find out if the UB was intentional with the

Dave, Dead code elimination is generally done in a pass called dead code elimination, Can you give concrete examples why the same would not be true for UB code elimination ? Yes, speculatively hoisting code requires it to be UB-free, but that has nothing to do with UBCE deleting entire blocks of code because of the existence of UB. The former requires an analysis proving UB-absense, the

> On Jul 21, 2017, at 10:55 PM, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > 2017-07-21 22:44 GMT-07:00 Peter Lawrence <peterl95124 at sbcglobal.net <mailto:peterl95124 at sbcglobal.net>>: > Mehdi, > Hal’s transformation only kicks in in the *presence* of UB > > No, sorry I entirely disagree with this assertion: I believe we

David, -fsanitize=undefined sounds great, but is not quite what I want. I recently ran into a problem with "CodeGen/MachineSink.cpp” [*], for a target that has to expand Select into control flow. The original IR had two select in a row that were based on the same condition, so the CMP that sets the FLAGS reg in the second select was MCSE’ed to the earlier CMP in the first

> > Having read all of these threads, I am thoroughly convinced by the positions put forward by others. > Chandler, others have decided to let the compiler continue mis-compiling the function-inlining example, others have decided to not fix the inability to hoist a loop invariant divide out of a loop. It sounds like you haven’t even thought about these things let alone

r-help Forum I'm using the dplyr:: summarize_all(funs(sum)) function and am receiving a warning message that the `funs()` is deprecated as of dplyr 0.8.0. Ok what should I be using to summarize all columns by sum? Jeff [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I am setting up a PDC with LDAP, but having no luck with it. Basically, the Win XP computer successfully joins the domain, but after restarting when I try to login it says "The system cannot log you on now because the domain THEBITGURU.LAN is not available." I am running a Ubuntu 10.10 server with Samba 3.5.4 and OpenLDAP 2.4.3 (slapd). I have compressed all of the samba logs

Hello, I don't have much experience but I'm looking for a way to contribute to Nouveau. I'd be glad to work on documentation, edit IRC logs, make cosmetic changes to code, etc. Just let me know if you have any work of this sort and I'll give it a shot. Thanks, Adam Cozzette

I'm trying to use Access 2002 on a Samba server.....question, are there special Samba parameters that need to be set so that 3-5 users can enter data? All users have proper access (no pun intended) to the SAMBA server..... thanks jr

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 7:40 AM Peter Lawrence <peterl95124 at sbcglobal.net> wrote: > Dave, > Dead code elimination is generally done in a pass called dead > code elimination, > Can you give concrete examples why the same would not be true for UB code > elimination ? > I haven't actually looked at how optimizations on the basis of the code being UB-free

Bert Here are some examples of the type of text strings I?m dealing with: ??????.??.??? ??????.??.?????????? ?Torrent? Pro - Torrent App ?Torrent?-Torrent Downloader 1 Pic 8 Words - Syllables 1 Pic 8 Words - Syllables 27043_Spanish songs for children 28.android.com.alpha.horoscope 28.android.com.bravo.horoscope 28.Card Game - Offline 28.card Game Multiplayer 37045_Spanish songs

Every post I do to this mailinglist is followed by a bounce message from "centos.5.warren at recursor.net". I have no clue why this is being send to me, afaics some IP address is being blacklisted but I am not related to it. Am I the only one who gets this and can we remove this person from the mailinglist ? Kind regards, -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/

The warning gives some suggestions. E.g., replace funs(sum,prod) with list(sum=sum,prod=prod). % R CMD Rscript -e 'library(dplyr,warn.conflicts=FALSE); data.frame(X=1:3,Y=c(11,13,17)) %>% summarize_all(funs(sum,prod))' X_sum Y_sum X_prod Y_prod 1 6 41 6 2431 Warning message: `funs()` is deprecated as of dplyr 0.8.0. Please use a list of either functions or lambdas:

Sean, Let me re-phrase a couple words to make it perfectly clear > On Jul 21, 2017, at 6:29 PM, Peter Lawrence <peterl95124 at sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > Sean, > > Dan Gohman’s “transform” changes a loop induction variable, but does not change the CFG, > > Hal’s “transform” deletes blocks out of the CFG, fundamentally altering it. > > These are two totally

Chandler, Please give some citations, I’ve search the llvm-dev archives and didn't find any. Peter Lawrence. > On Jun 28, 2017, at 12:01 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 9:39 AM Peter Lawrence <peterl95124 at sbcglobal.net <mailto:peterl95124 at sbcglobal.net>> wrote: > > Preface: This paper