similar to: strange ACLs from NT

I've been running Samba & Squid on a RH linux server for years. I'm currently running: kernel - 2.4.9-31 squid - 2.4STABLE-6 /home - 100 GB Reiserfs partition I just upgraded samba from 2.0.10 to 2.2.5 this morning. Now, the server is running out of filedescriptors. I have never had this problem before. What is 2.2.5 doing differently? How can I resolve this problem? Please help,

samba 2.2.4 on RedHat 7.1 everything is working. wbinfo -t reports a good secret. users can access shares. the samba server shows up in the browser & server manager. However, this server is not able to change the password on it's machine account. I log the following errors once a day: May 29 08:16:33 rhtemp1 smbd[5056]: domain_client_validate: unable to fetch domain sid. May 29

Steve Frampton [mailto:frampton@j-com.co.jp] of your address change Content-Length: 7142 samba@samba.org David Barroso <h4371719@alumnes.eup.udl.es> Jeremy Allison <jeremy@valinux.com> "Tulipant Gergely" <tulipant-gergely@dbrt.hu> Edwards Philip M Contr AFRL/SNRR <Philip.Edwards@wpafb.af.mil> Drenning Bruce <bdrenni@catholicrelief.org> Glenn

I've been using 2.0.x on my servers for a couple of years & am a very, very happy customer (thanks Samba team). There are only 2, albiet small, annoyances. 1) Any account administration results in changes having to be made on both the NT domain & linux server. 2) I can't do permissions for a "group of groups" on the linux server. It seems that winbind might be able to

On 04/05/2018 08:32 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Sat, 2018-03-24 at 20:38 -0400, Ken McDonald via samba wrote: >>> By default, step 4 takes forever to run on large datasets because it >>> uses named entities. My ultimate plan was to use the numeric >>> user/group id's in that step instead of named ones so the Winbind cost >>> is not incurred. Seems for

I'm using samba and cups to allow NT/2k machines to print to an HP LaserJet 4000N printer. The printer works fine except for one in house program. In this one program, all the horizontal lines that should be printed are missing. Originally I thought this was a driver problem, but today, for no apparent reason, it started printing the horizontal lines... but only for the first page of each

This seems to be an excessive amount of cross posting. I'm trimming down the CC list. On Sun, 21 Oct 2001, ncc22, Gecis (CAP, GECIS) wrote: > Problems (Bugs) Faced with Samba 2.2.2 with winbind > > 1. We have installed the samba 2.2.2 with winbind option in Red Hat > Linux Kernal Version 2.4.2-2 on i686. We joined samba server to domain > with smbpasswd option successfully.

On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:46:24 +0100 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 03.01.19 um 15:29 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:08:46 +0100 > > "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> > >> We are in the process of switching over shares

running 2.05a on red hat 6.1 I get a lot of these in my logs: smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(868) Reloading services after SIGHUP. Can anyone shed any light on this?

How to manage my Samba ACLs from NT ? My administrator seemingly doesn't have the rights to change ACLs (ownership). And even though my administrator owns the fiels on the Samba machine it has no rights to change ACLs or ownership. The files are owned by "DOMAIN+Administrator" and group is "DOMAIN+Domain Admins". I have added the user to smbpasswd I think (how can I check

I have two users on my network, Mary and Bob, who work together in a shared share. They both belong to the group Accounting. Bob is a savvy Linux user who accesses the share via NFS4. Mary toils away using Windows accessing the share via the Samba server. Mary will create a directory on the share and dump a number of files in which Bob and Mary will split the load. Bob, being a LInux user, will

Dear All, I wonder if someone could help me with a problem I have on a Linx fileserver with Samba 2.2.2, XFS and NT acls. The situation is like this: On a SuSE 7.3 distribution the 2.4.14 kernel is patched with XFS patches and copiled with support for XFS and acl, as stated on XFS project page at SGI. Further all the XFS binaries are installed. Samba 2.2.2 is configured and compiled with

Hi, I am experiencing the problem as described in http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-Guide/kerberos.html#id2562652 Unfortunately the remedy/workaround as described there does not work in the more general case of ACLs. Problem description: - User A owns file F. - User B has rw access to F via a user ACL - Group G has rw access to F via a group ACL - User B edits the excel file F - User

Here's the scenario: - Debian stable. - Samba 2.2.3a-13 w/ ACL support. - XFS filesystem. - smb.conf: admin users = admin "@Domain Admins" - admin == the domain administrator account. I'm trying to recursively reset the permissions and access list entries on a series of directories. Some of the files are owned by users other than admin. Besides the "admin users"

It has been my experience that only the owner of the file and root change change ACLS on that file. Since you've stated that Administrator IS the owner, maybe there's something else. Are you getting any errors ? Who is the owner of the diretory that the folder resides in. Is the Administrator given write permissions at the share level? My work-around for modifying ACL's was to

Howdy! Got a wierd one here.... on 2.2.1a with "nt acl support = yes" I do not seem to have any problems... however, when I do 2.2.2, I get issues with deleting roaming cache in Windows 2000/SP2 on logoff...but, when I set "nt acl support = no" everything is way cool. now on 2.2.3a it does the same thing and on 2.2.4-pre also does the same thing. The issue with this is it

Hello , the described bellow happens both in samba 2.2.7a and 3.0-alfa22. First bug: As it is easy to check smbd , when asked about ACL entry of a file never sends to the client OS DENY Access Control Entries , only ALLOW. so for example for a XFS file with acl: # owner: a user::r-- group::rwx other::rwx Win2K security tab shows for user "a": Read & exec =

Hi all, I have a 2.2.7a member server (on Debian unstable), acting as a file server for a W2k domain (which also has some NT4 clients, ie. mixed mode). I'm also using ACLs. Imagine I have a file on the server with an ownership of DOMAIN+foo (full permission - rwx). I also have a user ACL on that file of DOMAIN+bar, also rwx. This all works fine. I was initially running into a problem

Am 03.01.19 um 15:29 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:08:46 +0100 > "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> We are in the process of switching over shares from the old way of >> doing this to Windows ACLs: >> >> disable "valid users" "write list" etc >>

Hi all, I'm reposting because there was no response from the list. I'd be glad if anybody could comment... I'm planning a migration from Sun Microsystems' PCNetLink CIFS service to Samba and have a problem I cannot solve: Is there a possibility to map Windows ACLs to reflect the following: We have user groups with their own group directories. We need to provide some users in