similar to: Halfway there...

Hi, I'm trying to share a machine that's on the other side of a gateway. The machine being shared is a Linux (kernel 2.2.1 (RedHat 5.2) and samba 2.0.3), and the box trying to access it is NT4.0 with SP5. It looks something like this ------- --------- ------ |Linux|-----------|Gateway|----------| NT | ------- --------- ------ 192.168.32.72

While I wait for an answer to my last question, allow me to ask another. When we upgraded a samba server from 2.x to 3.0.0-2mdk using LDAP, we managed to change the domain SID. Instead of fixing the SIDs on the sever, I re-added the hosts to the domain. Although it was a lot of work, it was successful on most of the systems on the network. However, we have one old NT4 box on the network

I have a network which consists of two subnets, each with a linux server providing Samba services. With the configuration listed below, I have successfully achieved Subnet B being able to browse Subnet A but, Subnet A cannot browse Subnet B (sharename not found). Is it a Samba configuration issue or is it DNS? (I have it fixed if I put an /etc/lmhosts file on Linux Server A that has the host

Thanks to all for a wonderful package. It's sharing fine from my Debian box but smbclient isn't working the other way round. Here's the detail: I have three machines together: an NT4 Workstation (sp3), a Win95 machine and a Debian (Hamm = latest stable release). The NT 4 machine has a shared drive I want to access from my Debian machine. I can access that share from the win95

Hi all, In the last couple of months, there have been two proposed patches for the regain play analysis code. The first by Nathan Rennie-Waldock: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2011-December/003070.html simply adds some more higher sample rates. The second by Earl Chew: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2012-January/003067.html is more comprehensive. Neither of the

This is mostly in a traditional pbx-like setup. That is, these are individual remote offices of a larger corporation each with their own cluster (or clusters, in the case of one site). So there is no NAT, and it is an Asterisk-only solution (at least insofar as telephony software is concerned). Regards, - Brad _____ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com on behalf of David Thomas

Gurus... If I set up my project to use SQLite (so it can come up) and attempt to connect to oracle via: oracle_connect = $application_properties[$connect_string] oracle_conn = OCI8.new(oracle_id, oracle_password, oracle_connect) where oracle_connect equals ''//bobs.big.boy.gov:1521/D09'' (with or w/o the introductory //) my rails app connect to the oracle database just fine. If

Doug, I feel your pain. I have, since 3 days ago, all but giving up on dundi in a enterprise/carrier core scalable environment, mostly due to no ability to summarize dial plan routes across several servers that may or may not have contiguous extensions registered across the cluster. Example server 1 has exten 1234, 1235, 1001, 1002 registered and server 2 has 1236, 1237, 1003, 1004. But also in

I have two Canon printers a MF4720W and LBP7100Cw. Previously a PC running CentOS 6 were able to print without problems via network. Unfortunately the hard disk died and in replacing it, we also upgraded to CentOS 7. Now the problem is that a test print to either printers looks OK for the first half then inverts colours for the second half. i.e black text on white background becomes white text on

Honestly, I don't see the motivation for this. There are many similar projects that are mature, so my feedback would be: don't reinvent the wheel and contribute to those. I?aki El vie., 14 jun. 2019 3:18, Abby Spurdle <spurdle.a at gmail.com> escribi?: > I thought that I'd get more feedback. > But it's ok, I understand. > > I wanted to note that I've moved

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 7:24 PM I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > There are many similar projects that are mature I'm not sure what projects you're referring to. If we create some constraints: (1) Internal systems consoles (*plural*). Rules out most things. Noting that many tools are designed to bypass the console. (2) Modern user interface. Rules out Vim

Hello, This is probably a question to developers. If nobody responds, I will go the developers mailing list and bug you there. :) A while ago I have posted a question here about why my Samba gives the message "Error writing file: code 0". Nobody answered, so I have tracked down some stuff. (Someone recently noted the same bug on HPUX.) My Samba is 2.0.3. I am writing a file via

I understand what you're saying now. While I have absolutely no proof of this, I have to believe that it's something they've solved. I've got several production systems (since early December of last year) using the type of cluster that I'm talking about, and I've yet to hear of any issues that could be related to this. I also did extensive testing both in the lab and at

On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 at 01:24, Abby Spurdle <spurdle.a at gmail.com> wrote: > > None of the tools that I've looked at satisfy these constraints. > But if you know of some, I'd like to know... And I would consider contributing... What about Atom, VS Code and the like? Or what about taking a project that meets most of the constraints and pushing to cover all of them, or even

I've written what I refer to as an "Integrated Console Environment". Similar to an IDE, but more console oriented, so suitable for running scripts and dynamic programming languages. Also, it's designed to be congruent with the file system. Obviously, I want to support R. However, the long term plan is to make the core system relatively language neutral, and to support R via a

According to the wiki at voip-info.org, the dial structure for using oh323 without a gatekeeper is: OH323/<exten>@<host>:<port> or OH323/<exten> The second option is valid only in the case where a gatekeeper is used. NOTE: OpenH323 library v1.12.0 has a bug in the parsing of the destination host. When this version is used then the above syntax should be:

Do you mean the peristence of connecting a specific phone to a specific server? If so, then it's relatively easy. The ldirectord has a persistence setting that does that. If I'm misunderstanding you, then could you explain further what you mean? Regards, - Brad -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On

At the moment I'm out of the office, but when I return I'll be certain to do that. Note that my solution is different from what you are working on with regexten, though I suspect some of the challenges that I've faced and overcome are not. I'm actually using UltraMonkey for load-balancing and failover of the Asterisk boxes, and my dialplan is set up so that it need not be changed

Well, I've been dicking around with DUNDi for about 4 hours now. I have two systems that I am trying to get to peer with each other. Queries are working one way, but not the other. The server, pbx1, that is refusing to deliver any queries and logs what's below to the console. Why??? I've checked all the config files more times than I can remember. The 'RFC' for DUNDi at

Hello everyone, I used samba 1.9.x before and everything was fine. The samba server lived in some local network and I could see it from my NTbox as well as from Win95/98 clients. I upgraded to version 2.0.3 and now my server is gone though I use the same smb.conf file which is pretty basic. I can connect to it using the "\\server\share" convention and can also see it when I do a