similar to: Dual Homed Samba Server Problem

Hi, I'm trying to install Areskicc but with no much sucess. After installing the UI I login as root/mypass, but in the left menu I only have 3 options: Main Template, disconnect and logout. When I click on Mail Template> Show mail template it shows an error page. First, is there a way to increase the debugging level so I can know what's going on behind the scenes? Second, I've

Well, It seems that I have exactly the same problem with my Samba 2.2.7a-8.9.0 (Redhat 9.0) ! I have ... around ... 60000 users and 140000 groups ! The "getent passwd" command don't show me all the existing users but around 10000 and the "getent group" command take a very long time but seems to be active ! When I redirect in a groups.txt file the result of the

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106592 Bug ID: 106592 Summary: 2nd GPU / screen not detected after driver / xorg update Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: medium Component:

Hi, I have a testing multihome setup, with the default gateway being one of the links and using policy routing to honor requests for a specific link. Everything works as expected when I request a specific IP to bind to. But if I request a specific interface things fall apart in ways that I can not explain: default gw (WORKS) ---------- rabbit@Thesaurus:~$ ping -c 1 yahoo.com PING yahoo.com

Hi all, I have a Linux box with two connections to the internet over two routers and a private internal network. The linux box does masquerading. internet +----------+ 172.16.0.1 +-------------------+ <---- | Router 1 |-------------------| | +----------+ | 172.16.0.2 | | | eth1

hi, since a few hours i get an error "protocol negotiation failed" "SMB connection failed" while mounting with smbclient //ip-adress/share mount -t smbfs -o username=user,password=pwd //ip-adress/share /mnt/smb the same commands are working since ~1 year via scripts/console ping, nmap, telnet <open_ports>, ... without problems 137/udp open

hi guys i need some advice for my case that i faced here.. i have Two AD with two different domain, platform and network : i expect all user in different domain can resolve the other domain dns let say 1. domainwin.com >> windows 2008 AD >> 172.16.1.2 2. domainnux.com >> Samba 4 AD >> 172.16.2.2 is it possible if i create 1 new BIND DNS Server in 172.16.3.2

Hello, I'm recently stumbled over the libvirt network filter capabilities and got pretty excited. Unfortunately I'm not able to get the the "clean-traffic" filterset working. I'm using a freshly installed Debian Stretch with libvirt, qemu and KVM. My config snippet looks as follows: sudo virsh edit <VM> [...] <interface type='bridge'> <mac

Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport]. Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24 network traffic. Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf on one and ping from the other. The results would be as expected; traffic would be split between the two interfaces. Testing with an ftp transfer of

Hello everyone, I'm trying to add a second DC to a Samba 4 AD: they both have multiple NICs and for this reason cannot find a way to make it work. They communicate through VPN and both have one of the bound interfaces set to the same IP address, 172.20.0.1, which doesn't allow me to route to the correct DC, and that is only part of the problem. Here is the configuration: *

Dear all, I am trying to configure a basic TINC vpn between two sites using OpenWRT routers. The link seems to work, the ping between the two routers is ok, but I can't ping hosts between the subnets behind the routers. This is the configuration: ======== SITE 1 (CLIENT) - polimnia (subnet 192.168.4.0/24, gw 192.168.4.1) tinc.conf ------------- Name = polimnia ConnectTo = calliope

Dear Yalang, that did the trick. If I look in the NAT table of the bridge I can see the generated rules. Probably wouldn't have though about that ever. Thanks a lot! Best Sam On 29.12.18 06:51, Yalan Zhang wrote: > Hi Sam, > > You can find the rules by below command, and it looks as below: > # ebtables -t nat --list > Bridge table: nat > > Bridge chain: PREROUTING,

Hello Julien, Am Mon, 14 Jan 2019 22:15:47 +0100 schrieb Julien dupont <marcelvierzon at gmail.com>: > ** Test 1 ** > On VPN_office I use 'tcpdump -npi any icmp and host 192.168.1.3' > When pinging 192.168.1.1 from client 1, with no success, I see no packet > passing. Sorry - the tcpdump command should end with "192.168.1.1" instead of

Right-- I've seen the Avaya document you cite below. It says "To administer DHCP option 242, make a copy of an existing option 176" but I don't have any example of option 176 or 242 to copy, and don't know what to do to /etc/dhcpd.conf to make it offer option 242. Then there's this long table of parameters to use with (presumably) option 242. I was hoping someone had a

For reasons unknown, any connections to localhost -- tcp, icmp, or udp -- are all originating from my external interface, rl0: $ telnet localhost 25 Trying ::1... Trying 127.0.0.1... telnet: connect to address 127.0.0.1: Can't assign requested address telnet: Unable to connect to remote host IPFW log: Jul 16 12:46:43 octo ipfw: 100 Accept TCP 192.168.1.119:1434 127.0.0.1:25 out via rl0

Hi, I am trying to setup a VPN between roaming users and the office. Main usage will be VNC sessions to some Linux computers sitting on the office LAN. One machine on the office LAN, VPN_office, is dedicated to run tinc. The office router is behind another router for which we have no control, so I contracted an external computer VPN_out with a public IP to act as an in between connection. All

hi, I''ve a dedicated internet link 512k with a cisco router, and now, I want to upgrade bandwidth with 8 ADSLs (512k each) then: - build kernel 2.4.27 with pachs: - patch-o-matic-ng-20040621 : CONNMARK, H323, etc... - http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#multigw Julian''s patch. - Activate "equal cost multi path" (Advanced Router-Networking Options) and so on -

This is my simple situation: I want to policy download and shape upload going through my router. It has two interfaces: eth0 (10.4.10.222/24 connected to LAN) and eth1 (172.16.0.1/24 connected to my laptop). My setup: [eth1] tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 999 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1Mbit tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match

Hello, I have downloaded and compiled 2.2.6 to replace my 2.2.6pre. I spent a large part of the day debugging the startup script because it seemed to always be starting two nmbd processes instead of one. Eventually I tried running just /usr/local/samba/bin/nmbd - and still got two nmbd processes. Is this correct behaviour? On the first server (Dell 4600) I thought it might be because it has

I have a server, server A, with three NICs: two to the Internet via separate ADSL modems, and one to the LAN. The two ''net'' interfaces are configured as described at http://www.shorewall.net/MultiISP.html. This has been working for a number of months. I am now testing an OpenVPN link between server A and another (currently single-ISP) server (server B). I can establish the VPN