similar to: Linux vs NT: a new test

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Linux vs NT: a new test"

2000 Feb 08
1
[2.0.7pre1] --with-utmp enabled ...
Under Solaris 7/sparc, I get: Compiling smbd/connection.c smbd/connection.c:381: conflicting types for `utmp_yield' smbd/connection.c:30: previous declaration of `utmp_yield' 381 has 'int pid', while 30 has 'pid_t pid' ... I changed 381 to reflect 30 and she continues on its way ... Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems
1999 Jun 03
0
Security related bug/issue ... or mis-configuration? (fwd)
As a followup to my own email... We did some testing here today with connecting to the share from an NT box, where we connect to \\relay\marc as marc when log'd in as a seperate user...NT refuses to allow it. Is there a bug with the server that, using smbclient from Linux, allows you to connect to any share without a password? Can someone test this and see if its a local problem or not?
1999 May 11
1
Security related bug/issue ... or mis-configuration?
Morning... Attached are two files. The first (smb.session) shows one user connecting to two different shares on a remote server using *no* password... The second is the smb.conf file found on that remote server, running Solaris 2.6, and Samba 2.0.3 ... I'm *really* hoping that its something that we're overlooking as far as configuration is concerned...or else there is one helluva
2003 Aug 12
0
union_lookup panic ...
G'day ... Altho it is rare, we are getting union_lookup panics on our server(s) ... as most on this list already know, we make heavy use of unionfs to share between jails, and I already know that this is the "kernel side" cause of the problem ... but ... From what I can tell, though, the "trigger" for the panic is pkg_delete ... if I build a jail'd environment,
1999 Dec 13
3
Comments request to refute arguments about Samba...
I can't answer any of this, but the following was taken from a thread on the "Novell Technology Transfer Partners List <NOVTTP@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>" and passed over to me by my boss... Any comments/refutations/etc most definitely accepted... Please note that *I'm* the Senior Unix Systems Administrator at the University I work at, and have been moving us towards Samba since I
2000 Jan 26
2
[2.0.6] doesn't run under Solaris 7/sparc, Internal Error
Is the following a known problem: =============================================================== [2000/01/26 09:41:03, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 22273 (2.0.6) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2000/01/26 09:41:03, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) =============================================================== This is using the same
1999 Jun 03
0
800+ simultaneous connections ...
Does anyone have any experience with a high number of *simultaneous* connections? We're investigating the possibility of moving one of our servers from novell to solaris, and the only "concern" we have at this time is what happens if 800 clients all decide to connect at the same time? the server will be running solaris/7 on a dual-ppro system ... I konw with the 'idle'
1999 Apr 08
0
Letting users modify there own 'valid users = ' directive
Here's an odd question/request ... Right now, if you setup smb.conf with a [homes] section, anyone can connect and login to the server, as themselves, and mount their home directory. No probs there. Has anyone thought of, and possibly implemented, a means where that end user could change things for themselves to extend permissions on their directory? Basically, make a Win based utility
2000 May 27
0
guest only from Win2000 -> Samba 2.0.7 ...
morning all ... I want to share a drive between two of my computers ... dont' want to deal with smbpasswd, so am just doing it as an open share with a host allow set to the computer that i want to share with ... smb.conf is setup nice and simple: [global] workgroup = MYGROUP server string = Samba Server hosts allow = 10.27.227.73 log file = /var/log/log.%m debug level = 3
2009 Mar 27
2
ALT_BREAK_TO... + ILO ... missing something in config ...
Due to an issue I'm having with 7.x, and trying to track it down, I spent tonight getting my server setup to allow my to break into the debugger when it hangs, and hopefully dump core ... But, although I *think* I've got it all, I'm obviously missing something, as it isn't breaking ... First ... I'm running a proliant server, and when I connect via SSH to ILO on that
1999 Feb 01
1
Benchmark results.
Hi all, For people who are looking for some objective numbers to help recommend Samba to their employers (I know there are some of you on this list :-) you might want to look at the following couple of articles. The first one is in Smart Reseller (a USA trade press magazine) at : http://www.zdnet.com/sr/stories/issue/0,4537,2196106,00.html titled : "The Best Windows File Server:
1999 Dec 13
2
Samba Survey ...
Just went to look at that page, and all the dates are pre-'98 as far as "last updates" are concerned... Does anyone have a URL or anything that has testimonials of some sort? Trying to provide my boss with ammunication against another 'manager' who just sent around comments from a Novell mailing list about Samba... I'm curious about stuff like server/platform being run
1998 Dec 07
1
two questions: mailing list & public shares
Morning... First off, is there a non-digest version of this list available? Second, and more important, from reading the docs, the following 'share' should not prompt me for a password...no? # This one is useful for people to share files [tmp] comment = Temporary file space path = /tmp read only = no public = yes If this is correct, then there is a problem here, since I
1998 Aug 25
2
/etc/printcap for samba-shared printer...
Morning... Just spent this evening getting printing setup off my FreeBSD machine (oh, how I love Solaris at these times *groan*)...got it now so that I can print directly from Netscape, color and graphics and all. The printer is an HP 560c. Now, I want to be able to print from my Windoze95 machine, and have samba setup for that, as well as file sharing. If I setup my Windoze machine such
2005 Jan 25
1
r square values for independent variables in multiple linear regr ession model -- newbie
Hello Could you please suggest a way to find out the r square values for each independent variable while using "lm" for developing a multiple linear regression model. Thank you avneet "I have no data yet. It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories instead of theories to suit facts." ~ Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
2005 Apr 19
1
Package 'R2HTML'
I recently learnt how to use Sweave which is a wonderful tool After which i also tried to use R2HTML as it would allow many of my colleagues who dont use latex to be able to use and edit my work. I was unable to make it work and couldnt find a way to implement it. I got some errors. I wonder if you could help me with it i have a windows 2000 OS and the version of R is "R version 1.9.1,
2004 Jan 09
2
* dialing before line is open?
Hi guys, I've had a sporadic problem recently with one of my users on our POTS line. About 1/3 of the time he dials a number (usually from a speeddial on his phone, I think), he'll get some phone company message (from the outside) about how the call could not be completed as dialed or something like that. However, the logs (and the console) always show the correct dialed digits.
2010 Mar 16
3
3.86-pre1 gpxelinux.0 SIS900 long boot time / fails to boot / no entries in tftp server log
Okay guys, This is separate from my last few messages. Along with those attempts, I decided to migrate from pxelinux.0 to gpxelinux.0 in my existing setup. Admittedly I haven't tried previous gpxelinux.0's but I am willing to if someone thinks it would be useful. Everything works as expected with pxelinux.0 of the same version. With gpxelinux.0: TFTP Prefix: Trying to load:
2008 Oct 29
2
Problem with Bridging ... and bge devices under FreeBSD 7.x?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm trying to run a QEMU VM on top of a FreeBSD 7.x server ... I've tried the exact same setup on my desktop, using 192.168.1.x and an fxp device, and it all works perfectly, but as soon as I do this on another machine on a public IP, I'm not getting any routing, I can't even ping it from the same machine ... My first thought was
2005 Jul 03
0
"bug" with ifconfig ... ?
I just made one of my 4.x remote servers inaccessible and just tested it on my 5.x laptop, and it does the same thing ... not sure if this is considered a 'desirable' effect, or a but ... but ... 'ifconfig <device> -alias' will wipe out all IPs on the device: mobile# ifconfig -a lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask