similar to: Can a router be a local master browser in a NT domain?

I'm hoping this turns into another case of 'knowing it works makes it happen.' I am involved with a unix clearcase installation which now needs to work with nt. We have clearcase 3.2.1 running on both the unix and nt side. Because we have checkin/checkout triggers hooked to some unix-side stuff, we need the unix views to be accessible from nt. Does anyone have direct experience

I'am using Samba 3.0rc1 on a SuSE 8.2 system (heimdal kerberos). I managed to join a Active Directory REALM, but I have difficulties with user authentification. Something may be wrong with my winbind setup: e.g. I cannot connect from a Windows 2003 Server to a samba share without being prompted for account and password. Furtheron wbinfo -u returns "error looking up domain users", but

Hello David, After some experiments and discussions I came to the following result concerning private NT-Box connecting to a LAN via ipchains and using all NETBIOS services (incl. domain-logon): Cross-subnet browsing with NETBIOS could only be done by a local master browser in the private net. I first thought of using Samba on the Linux router for that. But the Samba service would have to use

Is there anyone out there successfully using Rational Clearcase with SAMBA? Was there any special changes you had to make to get it to work? We were told by Rational specifically not to use SAMBA and wanted to get the other side. TIA Paul Gilles Navigation Technologies -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/ms-tnef

(refers to posting "Samba 3.0 + ADS, winbind problem" from August, 28th) Setup: client: SuSE8.2 professional (kernel 2.4.20-4GB) with openldap2 2.1.12 and heimdal kerberos 0.4e from the SuSE CDs and Samba 3.0.0RC3 compiled from source with flags "--with-ads --with-pam --with-acl-support". server: Windows 2003 Server as Active Directory Controller (configured as pure

I already wrote some lines about vmware with hostonly mode networking in SAMBA digest 2339 (as far as samba is concerned). Bernhard > > Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 23:43:15 -0500 > From: Dennis Boylan <dennis@lan.com> > To: samba@samba.org > Subject: VMware and host-only with Samba. > Message-ID: <19991218234315.A4332@smp.lan.com> > Mime-Version: 1.0 >

Hello, we run samba 2.0.6 on Solaris2.6 and use it together with clearcase (version 3.2.1). Sometimes the checkout of files from a clearcase NT-client hangs and probably causes clearcase to destroy the viewstore. In the samba logfile of that client I found the following message: [2000/02/17 09:29:49, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2401) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Torvald Riegel <torvald at se.inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote: > On Tuesday 13 July 2010 19:48:25 you wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Torvald Riegel >> > I thought that the layout of structs was supposed to be preserved (wrong >> > assumption?). Otherwise, any ideas why this happens? >> >> It should be preserved in

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Torvald Riegel > <torvald at se.inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote: >> On Tuesday 13 July 2010 19:48:25 you wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Torvald Riegel >>> > I thought that the layout of structs was supposed to be preserved (wrong

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Andrew Lenharth <andrewl at lenharth.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Torvald Riegel >> <torvald at se.inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote: >>> On Tuesday 13 July 2010 19:48:25 you wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:09

On Tuesday 13 July 2010 19:48:25 you wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Torvald Riegel > > I thought that the layout of structs was supposed to be preserved (wrong > > assumption?). Otherwise, any ideas why this happens? > > It should be preserved in general; Is this a "should" or a "must"? Are there any cases in which structure layout must be

On Wednesday 01 April 2009 20:01:09 Dan Gohman wrote: > On Apr 1, 2009, at 7:25 AM, Torvald Riegel wrote: > > On Wednesday 25 March 2009, Luke Dalessandro wrote: > >> You could encode this information as simple library function calls > >> and > >> then find them again in the generated LLVM IR. The client then just > >> needs a header declaring the

Hello all, I have been developing some ajax stuff all week. Just this morning the ajax calls quit working in Safari, and Firefox. I backed out to a last known working state and they still were not working, so I added some handlers to see if I could sniff out the problem. ... onException: function(transport){$ ("serversaid").innerHTML=transport.toJSONString();}, onFailure:

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Andrew Lenharth <andrewl at lenharth.org> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Torvald Riegel >>> <torvald at se.inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote:

On Monday 17 December 2007, Christopher Lamb wrote: > On Dec 17, 2007, at 1:22 AM, Torvald Riegel wrote: > > Would it be possible to keep get() unchanged, with a default > > behaviour, plus > > a warning? Otherwise everybody (assuming everybody gets type void*) > > will > > have to update their LLVM passes, and either maintain two versions > > of the >

Hi Vikram, I want to use poolalloc as a means for partitioning memory in Software Transactional Memory. We will have a paper about tuning parameters in word-based STMs in PPoPP 08, but there we use one configuration for the complete TM, which obviously has limitations in heterogenous workloads. Partitioning with poolalloc should give me (1) hopefully meaningful partitions (ie,

I would like to announce the availability of compiler support for generation of transactional code in LLVM IR. Our tool is called Tanger and it is an LLVM pass. You can download Tanger at: http://tinystm.org Transactional memory (TM) is viewed by a lot of people to be an important tool for enabling parallelism in a wide area of applications, and especially for developers that are not skilled

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Torvald Riegel <torvald at se.inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote: > Hi, > > attached is small program in which padding inside a struct is lost when using > llc, but is not lost when using llvm-gcc or gcc. In particular, padding is > missing after codegen with llc (see (1) below, LLVM 2.7, Linux x86_64): > typedef struct { >    unsigned txnal; >

On Apr 1, 2009, at 7:25 AM, Torvald Riegel wrote: > On Wednesday 25 March 2009, Luke Dalessandro wrote: >> You could encode this information as simple library function calls >> and >> then find them again in the generated LLVM IR. The client then just >> needs a header declaring the functions and information on what they >> mean. Since there are never any