similar to: PAM support (retracted)

Since I now have something which at least pretends to work, I suppose an announcement is in order. Those among you who track samba development are probably aware that samba 1.9.18p4 includes support for synchronising a unix database when changing an SMB password. I'm currently working on a PAM module which will provide similar functionality for all applications compiled with PAM support:

>Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 08:45:24 -0400 (EDT) >From: "Sean E. Millichamp" <sean@compu-aid.com> >To: Jonathan Kelly <j.kelly@julien.ca> >Subject: Re: The samba recycle bin clarified >Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9906180840490.20382-100000@keymaster.compu-aid.com> > >On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Jonathan Kelly wrote: > >> > Unless I am wrong, the

for this process is "root", that is correct. The PID 7247 is one of the users, but the UID shouldn't be "root" and should be the username that was authenticated during logon. Anyone have same or similar problem? and how do I prevent this problem from happening again? I would appreciate any help. Thanks. Will Sun wsun@jpl.nasa.gov (818) 354-2311 Return-Path:

Hello everyone... I have been using Samba v1.9.16p11 for a little while now and I just noticed that when I create a Windows 95 Briefcase on a Samba drive it appears as a folder (directory). This also happens when I move a briefcase created on a local drive to the network. I admit a small degree of ignorance here because I do not have an NT box to test the setup with so I do not know if this is

Not to be a pain, but I am experiencing turn around times of my own posts in excess of SIX hours. Is this usual for this list. I don't notice this on any other lists I monitor. Return-Path: <samba-admin@lists.samba.org> Received: from lists.samba.org (samba.sourceforge.net [198.186.203.85]) by netexpress.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g222iKO27320 for

I hope that someone can help me with this because I'm at a loss. I have a Samba server running RH 5.2 w/all errata plus Samba 2.03 that is used, among other things, to serve a share for a Windows program called "Business Works" which is a network accounting package. This program uses the standard Windows range-locking to implement it's network capability. I have been using this

Hello everyone, One of my clients is experiencing *very* slow printing and in certain circumstances interrupted printing from a Windows 95 OSR2 workstation to a Samba 1.9.18p10 server. The workstation is setup with server-stored profiles, desktop, etc. The user is trying to print large, graphics & color intensive Powerpoint presentation. It takes 10-20 minutes to spool about half the file

To any one who is using Red Hat Linux 6.0 (or, presumably, any glibc2.1 system) I recently installed a new RH 6.0 system on Intel. After installing my samba and my network application I noticed that I was experiencing oplock problems that were not present with the same version of Samba on my RH 5.2 systems and caused my application to not function. Since the problem seems to be with oplocks I

ftp://samba.org/pub/samba/alpha and all mirror sites. plenty of alpha releases have got to be good for the soul. - fixed security = domain. i had some nice recursion problems, i love filling up my process table with samrd and lsarpcd calling each other (...only kidding). - fixed up netlogond so that pam_ntdom can contact it on a domain loopback _even_ for domain logons, and netlogond will

update: - fixed smbd for win95-style profile-locating (it now works, thank you to everyone who sent in log files to get this fixed) - various modes tested and confirmed as working: * ROLE_STANDALONE security = user encrypt passwords = yes domain master = no domain logons = no * ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC security = user encrypt passwords = yes domain master = yes

I will be out of the office: From: Monday, Dec. 23rd Through: Friday, Jan. 3rd I will return to the office on Monday, Jan. 6th I will only be checking email or voicemail. Once or twice during that time period. Members of the I.T. dept. will be able to contact me if there is a critical issue. Enjoy the time off over the holidays and Happy New Year! >>> samba 12/21/02 12:00

>Neither the Sun PAM documentation nor the Linux-PAM documentation >describe the semantics of PAM_REINITIALIZE_CREDS in any useful detail. I would agree it is vague, but then that is also a problem with the XSSO document (http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/008329799/) >Could we please have a clarification on the semantics of >PAM_CRED_ESTABLISH vs. the semantics of

From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> Fix the definition of struct statfs64, required for run-init to work on alpha. verified to have no regressions on amd64. Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <janitor@sternwelten.at> Signed-off-by: Frederik Sch?ler <fschueler-guest@costa.debian.org> --- klibc-1.1.1.orig/include/sys/vfs.h +++ klibc-1.1.1/include/sys/vfs.h @@ -32,17 +32,17

hello vorlon, got notified of your patch, will apply next days upstream unless some critiques are voiced on ml. thanks. -- maks ----- Forwarded message from Steve Langasek <steve.langasek at canonical.com> ----- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:05:42 -0000 From: Steve Langasek <steve.langasek at canonical.com> Subject: [Bug 527720] Re: thumb2 porting issues identified: klibc uses

The scenario: I have two Samba servers on my network. One, running v3.0.37, is on my main server, a Solaris 10 x86 box. The other, just updated from 3.0.37 to 3.4.5 in the hope of solving this problem, is on my workstation, a Gentoo Linux box. The Linux Samba server shares only [homes]. The Solaris Samba server shares [homes] and four other shares. Unix UIDs are synchromized betwene the

Hi, I use a software develop by Brazilian softhouse, use netexpress ( cobol for windows ), the software run perfectly, but very slow, the database is postgres 7.3, using ODBC. Any idea. Sorry my english. Daniel,

Hello I asked this question, but He said I should put it on this list. So here it is. I hope someone can help me. So I took the liberty of sending you a email, and hope you don't mind. I want to use a linux server, and have one running, on SuSE 6 (going to 6.1 soon) Already I have been able to let the machine participate in the NT Domain. From my windows machine I can go to the Linux

severity 404538 normal thanks <vorlon> joeyh: binNMU support isn't RC, broken binNMU packages that get uploaded to the archive are. :) <vorlon> at least as the general rule -- see shy jo -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url :

Package: klibc Version: 1.5.20-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: ubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu natty ubuntu-patch Hi maks, Since the Ubuntu linux-libc-dev is now installing its asm headers to the multiarch /usr/include/<triplet>/ directory to allow co-installability, I've pushed the attached patch to Ubuntu so klcc knows to include this path when searching

Use klibc way to define a system dependent preprocessor definition: disabled by default and enabled for newer arm. Based on a patch by vorlon that got tested on his beagleboard, should be functional equivalent. Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/+bug/527720 Cc: Steve Langasek <steve.langasek at canonical.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill at shutemov.name> Cc: