similar to: nmbd errors on console

Hi all. Running 2.0.4b on a (now) solaris 2.6 box. Since the upgrade the smbd & nmbd daemons won't start. I tried starting smbd by hand, running it through truss. Here's the last few lines: getuid() = 0 [0] fstat(3, 0xEFFFF858) = 0 write(3, " [", 1) = 1 write(3, " 1 9 9 9 / 0

I just installed 2.0.4b on both of my Sun E4000's. The one is running fine. The other seems to be running fine too except SWAT reports that *mbd are _not_ running when they are. Moreover, the status page lists all the active connections while listing the daemons as not running. Stopping|starting|restarting does what is supposed to do but the status of the daemons is still listed as not

notice: /subject.sol1.net/virtual_mail_server/File[/etc/postfix]/checksum: checksum changed ''{time}Thu Jan 25 16:31:08 EST 2007'' to ''{time}Thu Jan 25 16:36:39 EST 2007'' I know there''s something weird in the directory modification detection that causes the next run after things actually change to suffer from this problem, but I''m getting it

I've tried this issue and could reproduce this issue: 1.Convert a guest with 2 disks to rhev. # virt-v2v -ic xen+ssh://10.66.106.64 -o rhev -os 10.66.90.115:/vol/v2v_auto/auto_export rhel6.6-i386-hvm -on 2disk-test -of qcow2 [ 0.0] Opening the source -i libvirt -ic xen+ssh://10.66.106.64 rhel6.6-i386-hvm [ 16.0] Creating an overlay to protect the source from being modified [ 47.0]

Dear R-users, I coded two equivalent ways to perform (in a simplified version) some matrix multiplications I would like to use in a more general framework. In the first case I used Kronecker product and vectorization of a certain matrix. This approach takes less time, but, as you may guess, I run out of memory when dimensions are large. In the second approach, I profited of sparseness and

Samba 4.17.9, I've already edited the schema to create an attribute and add it to the user class. I also added an already existing attribute to the user class, both are seen in the attribute editor. I created a third one, I think I did everything suggested in the wiki and I'm able to query and modify the 3rd attribute using LDAP. Is there a step after creating an attribute and modifying

On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 08:11:16AM +0000, VONDRA Alain wrote: > Hi, > I meet an amazing issue, when I convert a raw file to the oVirt environment using virt-v2v. > All seems to work fine, my VM is composed of 9 disks, the processes > finishes without any trouble, the files are well present in the > right import volume, but only the first system disk appear un my > oVirt Import

Dear list members, Any help on this efficiency issue would be greatly appreciated. I would like to find the most efficient way to run a non-vectorized function (here: fisher exact test p-value) iteratively using 4 matrices with identical dimensions. And as a result I aim for an array with identical dimensions containing the corresponding p-values. Please consider some code using a trivial

On Thu Mar 12, 2020 at 5:37 PM, David Blaikie wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 8:09 AM Luke Drummond > <luke.drummond at codeplay.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue Mar 10, 2020 at 7:45 PM, David Blaikie wrote: > > > If you only want code addresses, why not use the CU's > > > low_pc/high_pc/ranges > > > - those are guaranteed to be only code

On Wed Jan 15, 2020 at 6:58 PM, Reid Kleckner wrote: > Does the same limitation exist in VS 2017? I think that's our support > floor > these days: > https://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#host-c-toolchain-both-compiler-and-standard-library > It appears that all releases including the latest 2019 are affected. > > One *could* make the tablegen behavior conditional on the

I'm not across most of this debug info stuff but I'll stomp in here to confirm that AVR is a Harvard architecture, with separate addressing for the data and program buses via specialized instructions which will load from either one, or the other, but never both. It makes sense that this particular problem would also affect AVR - the backend does have some issues with debug info

On Tue Mar 10, 2020 at 7:45 PM, David Blaikie wrote: > If you only want code addresses, why not use the CU's > low_pc/high_pc/ranges > - those are guaranteed to be only code addresses, I think? > In the common case, for most targets LLVM supports I think you're right, but for my case, regrettably, not. Because my target is a Harvard Architecture, any code address can have the

I’ve encountered this kind of architecture before, a long time ago (academically). In a flat-address-space machine such as X64, there is still an instruction/data distinction, but usually only down at the level of I-cache versus D-cache (instruction fetch versus data fetch). A Harvard architecture machine exposes that to the programmer, which effectively doubles the available address space.

>>> Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> schrieb am 16.09.2017 um 08:12 in Nachricht <29959506-9f3b-2ad1-fc02-2aea7c53c084 at jmvalin.ca>: > Actually, you're supposed to add /usr/include/opus to your include path. > That's why the includes don't have the "opus/" prefix. Hi! But that's uncommon: You also don't put /usr/include/sys into

Hi all. Is it possible to have a generic share like [homes] that hides all user home dir shares by default by appending a "$" to them? I'd search the archives but they have not yet been tx'd. I realise there is "browse vs nobrowse" but I specifically need to have end users map to \\srv\user$ rather than \\srv\user. -- Mark

On Tue Jan 14, 2020 at 8:27 PM, Reid Kleckner wrote: > I don't think there's any technical reason for the current structure. Apparently [this](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/cpp/compiler-limits?view=vs-2019) is a thing. This results in the following delight happening on Visual Studio 2015: > fatal error C1091: compiler limit: string exceeds 65535 bytes in length So maybe

On Tue Nov 17, 2020 at 6:37 PM GMT, Min-Yih Hsu wrote: > Just trying to understand: Are you suggesting a way to have a “-O0” > build without all the debug information? > Exactly.

On Tue Nov 17, 2020 at 10:35 PM GMT, Michael Kruse wrote: > Am Di., 17. Nov. 2020 um 12:46 Uhr schrieb Luke Drummond via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > > > > On Tue Nov 17, 2020 at 6:37 PM GMT, Min-Yih Hsu wrote: > > > > > Just trying to understand: Are you suggesting a way to have a “-O0” > > > build without all the debug information?

On Wed, 15 Jan 2020, Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 11:14 AM Luke Drummond <luke.drummond at codeplay.com> > wrote: > On Wed Jan 15, 2020 at 6:58 PM, Reid Kleckner wrote: > > Does the same limitation exist in VS 2017? I think that's our > support > > floor > > these days: >

Hi Michael On Tue Nov 10, 2020 at 1:29 AM GMT, Michael Kruse wrote: > Am Mo., 2. Nov. 2020 um 14:01 Uhr schrieb David Blaikie > <dblaikie at gmail.com>: > > Hmm, not sure why the whole file was added only when MSVC support was added - if it is a "static library object file selection" issue. Wouldn't that have turned up on other platforms before that moment? >