similar to: SWAT status report wrong

Hi all. Running 2.0.4b on a (now) solaris 2.6 box. Since the upgrade the smbd & nmbd daemons won't start. I tried starting smbd by hand, running it through truss. Here's the last few lines: getuid() = 0 [0] fstat(3, 0xEFFFF858) = 0 write(3, " [", 1) = 1 write(3, " 1 9 9 9 / 0

I get the following errors on the console of my newly installed 2.0.4b server on a Sun E4000: nmbd/nmbd_packets.c: (1412) find_subnet_for_nmb_packet: response record not found for response id <num>. nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c: (240) find_response_record: response packet id <num> received with no matching record I don't know the internals well enough to decipher these, can

Hi all. Is it possible to have a generic share like [homes] that hides all user home dir shares by default by appending a "$" to them? I'd search the archives but they have not yet been tx'd. I realise there is "browse vs nobrowse" but I specifically need to have end users map to \\srv\user$ rather than \\srv\user. -- Mark

I’ve encountered this kind of architecture before, a long time ago (academically). In a flat-address-space machine such as X64, there is still an instruction/data distinction, but usually only down at the level of I-cache versus D-cache (instruction fetch versus data fetch). A Harvard architecture machine exposes that to the programmer, which effectively doubles the available address space.

Hi all, I need to calculate a multidimensional integration on R. I am using the command "adapt" (from library adapt), although sometimes I get the following error message: Ifail=2, lenwrk was too small. -- fix adapt() ! Check the returned relerr! in: adapt(3, linf, lsup, functn = Integrando1) I guess it happens because the domain of integration is too small, although I tried a

Hi all, I found a problem on R that looks like a bug to me. I am working with R for windows verson 1.9.0, but the problem also happens on the linux version 1.9.0. I hope that the problem is on my reasoning, and I would be grateful if someone could explain me why this happens. There goes the example: > x<-seq(-2,2,0.001) > y<-rep(0,length(x)) > for (i in x){y[1000*i+2001]<-i^2}

On Wed, 15 Jan 2020, Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 11:14 AM Luke Drummond <luke.drummond at codeplay.com> > wrote: > On Wed Jan 15, 2020 at 6:58 PM, Reid Kleckner wrote: > > Does the same limitation exist in VS 2017? I think that's our > support > > floor > > these days: >

I've tried this issue and could reproduce this issue: 1.Convert a guest with 2 disks to rhev. # virt-v2v -ic xen+ssh://10.66.106.64 -o rhev -os 10.66.90.115:/vol/v2v_auto/auto_export rhel6.6-i386-hvm -on 2disk-test -of qcow2 [ 0.0] Opening the source -i libvirt -ic xen+ssh://10.66.106.64 rhel6.6-i386-hvm [ 16.0] Creating an overlay to protect the source from being modified [ 47.0]

I'm not across most of this debug info stuff but I'll stomp in here to confirm that AVR is a Harvard architecture, with separate addressing for the data and program buses via specialized instructions which will load from either one, or the other, but never both. It makes sense that this particular problem would also affect AVR - the backend does have some issues with debug info

I have no strong opinion on this topic personally (I always set the build type to something if I’m not generating a Visual Studio project), but this “non-optimized, non-asserting, non-debug-info-containing” build that you get when not specifying the build type to CMake is a quirk that I feel most CMake users expect at this point. I don’t think there’s any real value in providing a useful default

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 9:31 AM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > With AVR being affected, upstreaming a patch to put segment selectors into > .debug_aranges becomes completely reasonable. There would likely want to > be a target hook somewhere to return a value saying what size to use, with > the default implementation returning zero. > *nod* something

Samba 4.17.9, I've already edited the schema to create an attribute and add it to the user class. I also added an already existing attribute to the user class, both are seen in the attribute editor. I created a third one, I think I did everything suggested in the wiki and I'm able to query and modify the 3rd attribute using LDAP. Is there a step after creating an attribute and modifying

On Thu Mar 12, 2020 at 5:37 PM, David Blaikie wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 8:09 AM Luke Drummond > <luke.drummond at codeplay.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue Mar 10, 2020 at 7:45 PM, David Blaikie wrote: > > > If you only want code addresses, why not use the CU's > > > low_pc/high_pc/ranges > > > - those are guaranteed to be only code

On Tue Nov 17, 2020 at 10:35 PM GMT, Michael Kruse wrote: > Am Di., 17. Nov. 2020 um 12:46 Uhr schrieb Luke Drummond via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > > > > On Tue Nov 17, 2020 at 6:37 PM GMT, Min-Yih Hsu wrote: > > > > > Just trying to understand: Are you suggesting a way to have a “-O0” > > > build without all the debug information?

An email that you sent to g.drummond@napier.ac.ukwith the subject title: Re: List has been blocked because it appears to contain a Virus/Worm. Please note : the recipient has been notified that your email has been blocked. In order to protect our systems the email has been deleted. Please clean and resend the email C&IT Services Napier University MailMarshal Rule: Anti-Virus (Inbound) : Block

I'm trying to run Stars! under wine. The problem is, when the game first starts it fires up a borderless window with "New Game" "Load Game" buttons but the window does not accept any input. Clicking on the buttons "does nothing". After selecting new game or load game you get to a "normal" bordered window. I had this working before, but at the time I

Am Di., 17. Nov. 2020 um 12:46 Uhr schrieb Luke Drummond via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > > On Tue Nov 17, 2020 at 6:37 PM GMT, Min-Yih Hsu wrote: > > > Just trying to understand: Are you suggesting a way to have a “-O0” > > build without all the debug information? > > > Exactly. What is such a build useful for the average user? If changing the

Hello everyone, I have a curious problem that seemingly came out of nowhere. After searching through the archives, I see that I am not the first to discover this problem, but so far, no solution has been found. In June 99, Mark Drummond mentioned a similar problem. Recently, I started seeing nmbd errors on the console. A little poking around revealed a log file full of these errors. Below is a

Just trying to understand: Are you suggesting a way to have a “-O0” build without all the debug information? -Min > On Nov 17, 2020, at 10:25 AM, Luke Drummond via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi all > > I wanted to do a quick build of a clean branch yesterday and noticed > something surprising in the configure log: > >> -- No build type

I'm curious how much of this is due to not using LLD? Last I checked, using ld.bfd instead of LLD (or gold) was one of my major build time issues, and somehow our default configuration would use ld.bfd. -- Sean Silva On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:25 AM Luke Drummond via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi all > > I wanted to do a quick build of a clean branch