similar to: ) Re: Too Many Active Users - With MS Access 97 (PR#17307)

fhsmith@logicsouth.com wrote: > > This is a follow up to an item placed on the comp.protocols.smb newsgroup. I have tried tweaking all of the settings until my face turns blue, so here goes: > > System is RedHat 6.0 - Linux Kernel 2.2.5-1. Samba 2.0.4b. > > Here is the gist of the problem (also posted on newsgroup). > > have a Samba server and about 10 Win95 machines

sean@compu-aid.com wrote: > > To any one who is using Red Hat Linux 6.0 (or, presumably, any glibc2.1 > system) > > I recently installed a new RH 6.0 system on Intel. After installing my > samba and my network application I noticed that I was experiencing oplock > problems that were not present with the same version of Samba on my RH 5.2 > systems and caused my

To any one who is using Red Hat Linux 6.0 (or, presumably, any glibc2.1 system) I recently installed a new RH 6.0 system on Intel. After installing my samba and my network application I noticed that I was experiencing oplock problems that were not present with the same version of Samba on my RH 5.2 systems and caused my application to not function. Since the problem seems to be with oplocks I

On 04/21/2017 12:11 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > ... > The latest version of libc5 I know of that was shipped by Red Hat is > in RHL 6.2, libc-5.3.12. (There is a 5.4, but not sure of stability > or compatibility). > ... > I've successfully set up the bridging; a CentOS 7 VM on the same host > has full connectivity. So it's something about the rtl8139 and the >

Hi all, I have made a RedHat 6.0 i386 binary rpm of 2.0.4b with the glibc2.1 configuration fix available at : ftp:<samba.org mirror>/pub/samba/Binary_Packages/redhat/RPMS/6.0/samba-2.0.4b-19990527.i386.rpm This rpm is to be preferred over the one on the RedHat 6.0 cd as it contains an autoconf configuration test to work around the glibc2.1 bug w.r.t. 64 bit locking (the one that

Hi all, I am having a strange problem after migrating to Rehat 8.0 and SMBD version 2.2.5 from RH 7.3 & SMB 2.2.3a. Everything appears to work fine, with the exception of the failure to open "VISIO" documents. This is strange because it only happens to VISIO, all other document types open with no problem. When someone tries to open a visio document, VISIO prompts "file not

I'm having problems getting "Secret is bad" with the command "wbinfo -t". I get good results with "wbinfo -u", "wbinfo -g", and "wbinfo -m". I also have positive results with all the samba tests in DIAGNOSIS.txt. I've tried deleting the computer account and recreating many times on my Windows 2000 Domain Controller (everything is native

I've (remote) access to a new Linux system which has some flavor of Rehat installed. Compiling R-0.64.2 fails -- at the end when eda.so should be made. make[4]: Entering directory `/u/u2/maechler/Linux/R/R-0.64.2/src/library/eda/src' gcc -g -O2 -fpic -I../../../../include -c line.c -o line.o gcc -g -O2 -fpic -I../../../../include -c smooth.c -o smooth.o ld -shared -o

Hi folks, I'm setting up a new samba box (Redhat ES 4.0, with Rehat samba-3.0.10-1.4E.9) to replace a proprietry OS X version that's been running home directories for our school staff - we've previously used local accounts and groups on the OS X server rather than the AD accounts all our staff have; one of the key goals in moving to a new system was to allow users to logon without

Hi folks, I'm setting up a new samba box (Redhat ES 4.0, with Rehat samba-3.0.10-1.4E.9) to replace a proprietry OS X version that's been running home directories for our school staff - we've previously used local accounts and groups on the OS X server rather than the AD accounts all our staff have; one of the key goals in moving to a new system was to allow users to logon without

Dear Lists. I use shorewall-14.7 at ReHat-9.0 (2.4.26 with Julian Anastasov Patch) for quite long, and everything seem work fine. Untill this morning, i have problem with one rules ACCEPT loc:172.16.0.20,172.16.32.20,172.16.0.230,172.16.0.229,172.16.0.231 net udp 53 - 172.16.0.229 and 172.16.0.231 is my mail gateway (DNAT). DNS server is outside the firewall, Now, the

Hi there all, I am trying to compile samba-2.0.6 in Solaris 2.6 on a SPARC processor. Running configure gives the following error: checking for fcntl locking... no checking for broken (glibc2.1/x86) 64 bit fcntl locking... no checking for 64 bit fcntl locking... no . . . checking configure summary ERROR: No locking available.

Mattc@genesis2000.com wrote: > > The program is the one our comany makes, called Genesis 2000 for windows. I > am currently engaged on testing for this on the Samba server platofrm. I am > using the built-in samba package on Linux Mandrake 6.0. Smbd ver 2.0.3. > > We experience problems with file locking. Our program is based on dbase > technology, running clipper command

In trying to install samba 2.0.6 on my mklinux system, I'm running into a lot of compiler messages about redifinitions while compiling any of the smbfs utils. The current state of mklinux is back several versions from the "regular" linux kernel, but is using glibc2.1. I understand smbsh is the preferred way to go instead of smbfs, but I also understand that smbsh is broken under

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17307 Summary: sfwdec-mozilla plugin stops playing sounds Product: swfdec Version: 0.6.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: plugin AssignedTo: swfdec at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy:

The Samba Team is pleased to announce Samba 2.0.5. This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version that all production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes. Please read the "IMPORTANT NOTE" section of the release notes as this explains three security bugfixes which have been added in this release. It is vital that Samba admins understand these

I have downloaded samba-3.0.0.tar.bz2 (and samba-latest.tar.gz) and attempted to run "./configure --with-ldapsam --with-winbind --with-pam_smbpass --with-smbmount --with-ads --with-ldap" Only to find that ./configure complains of a missing ldap.h file. Does anyone else have this issue? I'm trying to do a simple setup to having a Linux box communicate to my Windows 2000 Server PDC,

Hi, I have done a lot of work to try to get it to run, but now I am stuck. Following are the things I've tried. Money 97 will install (after a long time) on both Crossover Office 2.1.0 and wine-20040121. When starting the program in both Crossover and wine, an error dialog box is displayed when starting the program. The text of the error message is: "The path is not properly set up

Has anyone gotten MS Office '97 installed under the latest WINE? Each time I run setup.exe, it starts loading but then sits there. Ive left it overnight and nothing happens.

Has anyone had problems installed MS Office '97 professional under the lastest wine? I have my cdrom mounted to /cdrom [which is in my config] and abit into the installation it says "Setup Error 544: Setup is unable to open the data file E:\~MSSETUP.T\~msstfof.t\Off97Pro.stf" , run setup again from where your originally ran it" I always seem to get this error.