similar to: Testparm fails

Dear List, I have a problem. If I create a file under UNIX (samba 1.18.xx) with capital letters in its name and look at this file under NT the name become small letters. Not under Win95. What shoud I set to avoid the case changing in file names??? TIA && good byte! This is the first day of the rest of Your life!

Is anybody running SAMBA with NT4 SP4 clients ? -- +-------------------------------------------------+ | Milan Bednar mxb@inel.gov 208-526-8640 | | MAILSTOP EROB M/S 3640 | | | | "FACT times IMPORTANCE equals NEWS!" | +-------------------------------------------------+

We are now using samba for accesing to the UNIX resources from our PC's. But my question is ... WHERE can I find information on how to access to the PC resources from our UNIX workstations? Can somebody lead me through all of this amount of information available about samba? Thank you , David David Junyent djunyent@audifilm.com AUDIFILM BCN Av. Ic?ria, 145, 5? Planta Edificio

Does anyone know if Samba is being used on embedded devices as their SMB protocol stack? I have seen new hard disk arrays ("the Snap It hard drive or something like that") which is supposed to be MUCH more reliable than actual "computer file servers" because it is just a hard drive with a small embedded OS and web administration. NO OS HASSELS... I really like our new Lexmark

cI'm New to the list. I've been beating at Samba (the one shipped with redhat 5.2) for days I can get the server to show up in network neighborhood I can ping it. If I wait long enough (few minutes) I can finally get it to respond to both ftp and telnets. it's on a 10base-t cat5 configuration with just the server and the one w95 creating traffic. If I double click the server name

Dear List, When we copy an ascii file from SunSolaris Samba server to NT4.0 workstation, the file is getting control characters at the end of each line. Appreciate, if any clue given to solve this problem. Regards.

My LAN is running Samba v1.9.18p10 under RedHat Linux v5.2. Using the SMB services are Win95 and OS/2 clients. It's all running fine. I will soon be adding Win98, though, and I understand that there is a question of password encryption. I'm concerned how the encrypted/plain-text communication of password will affect my existing configuration. If I reconfigure Samba to use encrypted

"net view \\slack1" command on Win98 client returns "Error 86: The specified network password is not correct." The samba server (slack1) appears in Network Neighborhood. But I can't logon. Resource: \\SLACK1\IPC$ Password: Password is incorrect. The installation passes tests 1-7 of Samba Diagnosis Procedure. Same Win98 client passes all tests on a RedHat 6.2

Hi, yes, it is. Anyway, below are some of the diagnostics I have tried. Linux box Win95 Box ========= =========== hostname: saturn tempest ip: 192.168.0.2 192.168.0.1 Below are the diagnostics that I have tried and I ahve logged them: 1. From

Hi We are having some problems - the majority of our files require ascii transfers between our unix servers and PCs. They are however being transferred as binary for some reason even though they are just plain text files. This means (when going from unix to pc) the files come down without a carriage return at the end of lines. And when going from pc to unix they end up with ^M on the end of each

My server is RH 5.2 and i use Samba 1.9.18p10 and the client use WFW 3.11 with tcp/ip protocols installed. The subnet and the IP Address is right but I still only telnet form WFW 3.11 to Linux...not the reverse. On Linux telnet is working. I've checked it through this cmdline "telnet localhost 23 or telnet 127.0.0.1" . And I also testparm smb.conf and nothing wrong happen. FYI I set

On 2019-02-19 3:47 pm, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 15:25:51 -0500 >> What exactly does "START AGAIN" imply? Just chmod? > > 'ls' shows the correct ownership and Unix permissions: > > drwxrwx---+ 4 root domain admins 4096 Feb 17 19:13 programs > > But 'getfacl' show something different: > > getfacl:

--- Marco J. Shmerykowsky, P.E. marco at sce-engineers.com -------------------------------------------- Shmerykowsky Consulting Engineers Structural Analysis & Design 102 West 38th Street, 2nd Floor New York, New York 10018 Tel. (212)719-9700 Fax. (212)719-4822 http://www.sce-engineers.com -------------------------------------------- On 2019-02-19 4:22

I suggest you start with : 1770 /server (+ creator owner ) 3770 /server/programs ( + creator owner + creator group. ) Then check again with getfacl Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Marco Shmerykowsky via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 19 februari 2019 23:13 > Aan: Rowland Penny > CC: samba at

Please answer if anybody has solved this problem: [1999/07/19 20:59:41, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(216) file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 246 are available. Thanks in advance.

Hi list DFS Links in a separate share seems to work, but in the [homes] section does not. Is this a known problem? Samba is 3.0.26a. /etc/smb.conf excerpts: ---------------------------- 8< ---------------------------- [global] ... host msdfs = yes ... [homes] ... msdfs root = yes ... [dfstest] path = /data/dfsroot msdfs root = yes ---------------------------- 8<

Hello. I'm having a problem using rsync to copy my root partition to a new disk. This disk has a previous copy on it, and rsync seems determined to (unnecessarily) delete files from it. Worse, despite the fact that the files DO exist on the source, it does not update the destination, leaving me with less than I had before?! Here's my usage: ] server# /usr/local/bin/rsync -naxv --delete

I get the following errors in the smb.log file. If anyone has any ideas about this please let me know. [2001/05/01 09:51:46, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(154) Failed to set socket option TCP_NODELAY (Error Connection reset by peer) [2001/05/01 09:51:46, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(827) Get_Hostbyname: Unknown host [2001/05/01 09:51:46, 0] smbd/oplock.c:open_oplock_ipc(93)

kmail stopped working and when I check the dovecot log file I see: May 4 11:40:38 f12barry dovecot: IMAP(bscott): Corrupted index cache file /home/bscott/Maildir/._NewMail-com/dovecot.index.cache: Corrupted virtual size for uid=234: 633278 != 633251 May 4 11:40:38 f12barry dovecot: IMAP(bscott): Corrupted index cache file /home/bscott/Maildir/._NewMail-com/dovecot.index.cache: Corrupted virtual

I am new to working with samba. We have used samba for years connecting our windows systems to Unix systems services on OS390. Starting in and around November 2002 we can no longer connect. I have gone through the troubleshooting techniques. Our Samba system is up running, the mount points are correct and the config file tested out correctly. If any one is doing this could you please forward