similar to: Samba 2.0.4b Error reading file on 100bt only it seems...

I have noticed a very strange problem on a base Windows 95b computer. On a clean win95b computer with no additional software, the drive mappings in the logon scripts fail. The logon script uses 'net use' to connect the client to a share on the samba server. The server is running RH7.1 and Samba 2.2.2. The samba server is setup as a domain appliance and uses winbind, passing

The Wine development release 1.1.38 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - Better support for memory allocations debugging. - Improved MIDI support. - A wide range of Direct3D fixes. - OLEDB fixes (should fix Clipart in Office). - Improved debugger support on x86-64. - Many MSI fixes. - Various bug fixes. The source is available from the

Hi, I have recently upgraded hardware and now have a run-time error with R62.3 when I have built it from scratch with EGCS 1.1 (Guido's original binaries run OK). (333MHzK2, 64MBRam, 1.5GBHD, Win95b). Anyone any ideas ? R : Copyright 1998, The R Development Core Team Version 0.62.3 Beta (Sept 8, 1998) R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to

Dear all, I am using CentOS 4.4 Version Now.I want to Burn multi session CD using commands "mkisofs" and "cdrecord" on command prompt. I don't know how to configure the cdwriter(Samsung)? I am able to find the device using "cdrecord -scanbus" but when I want to get next track of already written cd using "cdrecord -dev=X.X.X -msinfo", system displays

Hi folks, I have a curious problem when executing self extracting zip files from a samba share. Everything does work, but it is very very slow. Copying the .exe onto local disk (from the samba share) takes no time at all (500kb/sec). I would say it takes about 10 times as long to unzip when run directly from the samba share. This happens will all self-extracting exe files, and also from any share

Hello everybody, today I had some time to test Peter´s decoding plugin on a very slow machine. My setup: - Pentium "classic" @ 50 MHz (underclocked!) - Mainboard with Mercury Chipset (I think) - CD-ROM and HDD in PIO-Mode (CPU intensive) - MAD16 Soundcard (ISA slot, CPU intensive) - Win95B, Winamp 2.76, Decoder Plugin 1.16 (RC 2) The hardware setup is something like the

Howdy all: I'm trying to use smbmount to mount a win9x share and copy some files for backup, eventually to run as a script invoked via cron. I have RH6.1/samba 2.0.5a, and the windoze box is win95b. If I do the standard mount (smbmount //winbox/backup /mnt/smb04) I have to be root. Also, after it's mounted, I can't create any files there as a normal user (even though the

Hi I am new to this list, but I have been having problems with samba for some time now. Here is the problem When my Win95 clients access the samba server I get real slow transfers, even if I only have one client accessing the server. It transfers at like 70k/s to 150k/s, and the collision lights on the hub start going crazy. even for 10 megabit networking, this is rather slow. (it takes like 3

At one of our sites we have a Solaris 2.51 box running 1.9.17. All of the clients are win95B. When these users print(printing is spooled on the Solaris machine) all applications on the PC are frozen until the printing is finished. Pretty cool, but not for the users. My suspicion is that there is some information that samba is sending to the PC's that is confusing them. Any experience out

Hi, me again Still trying to run diablo using wine. This time i included: The output when i run : wine setup.exe The listing of my wine-c (c:\) directory. The listing of my config file in the \.wine directory in the users directory Don't give me the answer, u don't have to breast feed me! But tell me if i can fix it without having any programming skills or knowledges of how wine works

Hi Folks: I am seeing excessively long logoff times on my Win2k clients - I am using Samba as a PDC. Excessively long == 6+ minutes. Network is 100BT switched. Total cable feet between client and server (including switch) - 10 foot. According to the switch, both machines are running at 100BT speed, full duplex. There is what appears to be a lot of network traffic between the client and the

please take us off of the samba e-mail list for the time being thanks. ----- Original Message ----- From: <samba@samba.org> To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA <samba@samba.org> Sent: Monday, October 25, 1999 5:44 AM Subject: SAMBA digest 2283 > SAMBA Digest 2283 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue

I have SLOW file transfers across samba to my Windows Server 2000 domain. I am using a built in 100bT Intel Pro NIC, I have tried the built in gigabit NIC and a PCI 3com, all with the same results. Using iperf, I get about 45-90Mb of bandwidth from my PC's to my samba server. I can pull it up by \\servername <file:///\\servername> or \\ipaddress <file:///\\ipaddress> with out

Hi. I have been searching through old threads and various forums, but can't seem to find out what the consensus view is here on the best type of FXO hardware to use for a home asterisk implementation. Specifically, should I buy a FXO ATA like the Sipura 3000, or a PCI form factor port like the Digium TDM400 series. I have read horrible things about problems with the X100P, so I have ruled

I'm running samba 2.2.4 on rh 7.2. Everything's been working well for months. I use the domain logon feature to map drives when '98 users logon to the domain. Recently I've had a couple machines refuse to process the logon script and I can't figure out why. Here's the Windows output: C:\WINDOWS> Access denied - Z:\ALEXA~03.BAT C:\WINDOWS> Access denied -

Hi all, I have just received the following e-mail from an Asterisk user: "I just made a call via BT to a mobile. Then an incoming call came in and Ann else answered it - it made my call go completely fuzzy and I could hear what the woman on the other line was saying to Ann but I couldn't hear my conversation! When Ann's call finished - mine went even fuzzier and all I could hear

Hi, I have a user who is getting a strange error when popping his mail over a DSL line. The error in my log file is as follows: file client.c: line 237 (client_send_line): assertion failed: ((size_t)ret == str_len(str)) I can POP his mail just find here locally connected to the server via 100bT, but over his DSL link, he gets this error. His mailbox size is 24MB, and he is using outlook w/

Hi, I've tried to compile 3.0.22 on HPUX 10.20 and get the following error msg: No options are used when running 'configure'. checking configure summary ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config ****** The server details: [qhus029@HP-UX]>uname -a HP-UX qhus029 B.10.20 A 9000/898 1684683361 two-user license

Recently setup Samba on a RH Linux 6.1 box at home - network is 100bT - and printing /browsing works great. However reading or writing files of any size to the share seems overly slow. For instance a simple 1MB PNG file takes 20-30 seconds to load up. Of my local HD it's instant. Any ideas what could be causing this? I read through quite a few docs to get this working to begin with :)

Matthew Chapman wrote: > When I mount a W95/98 drive and create or modify files, everything is > groovy. > > When I mount an NT drive and create, modify, or read files (as in, copying > them from the NT drive to my own local drive), the dates go crazy. > > Our sysadmin tells me the NT system is NT Server 4.0 Enterprise Eddition, > service pack 3. Hi, Matthew, I'am