similar to: Printer name is invalid

Dear R-helpers, I am struggling with an optimization problem at the moment and decided to write the list looking for some help. I will use a very small example to explain what I would like to. Thanks in advance for your help. We would like to distribute resources from 4 warehouses to 3 destinations. The costs associated are as follows: Destination >From 1 2 3 Total

Dear R helpers I have following data stocks <- c("ABC", "DEF", "GHI", "JKL") prices_df <- data.frame(ABC = c(17,24,15,22,16,22,17,22,15,19),                                          DEF = c(22,28,20,20,28,26,29,18,24,21),                                           GHI = c(32,27,32,36,37,37,34,23,25,32),                                          

Dear All The problem is about regularization methods in multiple regression when the independent variables are collinear. A modified regularization method with two tuning parameters l1 and l2 and their product l1*l2 (Lambda 1 and Lambda 2) such that l1 takes care of ridge property and l2 takes care of LASSO property is proposed The proposed method is given

Dear All, First of all, this is the first time for me to use R for optimization, I tried to search r-help postings & googled on weighted sum optimization, I could not find anything applicable. I would need to optimize following function in R; MAXIMIZE function = w1*R1 + w2*R2 + w3*R3 + w4*R4 Where constraints are, w1 + w2 + w3 + w4 = 1 and 0 <= w1, w2, w3, w4 <= 1 Does optim

I have huge list of edges with weights. a1 b1 w1 a2 b2 w2 a3 b3 w3 a1 b1 w4 a3 b1 w5 I have to convert it into 2 dim matrix b1 b2 b3 a1 max(w1,w4) 0 0 a2 0 w2 0 a3 w5 0 w3 if edges repeated take the maximum weights. How do this efficiently without using for loop? Any idea. thanks Avi [[alternative

Hi, Jiong, Thanks for the patch! It is a great start to support 32bit register in BPF. In the past, I have studied a little bit to see whether 32bit register support may reduce the number of unnecessary shifts on x86_64 and improve the performance. Looking through a few bpf programs and it looks like the opportunity is not great, but still nice to have if we have this capability. As you

Thanks for everyone's help with zoo -- I think I've got my data set ready. (The data consists of surface weather temperatures, from 2002 to 2005, one observation per hour. Some values are missing... i.e. NA) I have three goals: GOAL #1:Get the data in proper time series form, preserving frequency information: > w4.ts <- as.ts( w3.zoo, frequency=(1/3600) ) I hope that 1/3600

I have a really simple question I have a data frame of 8 variables (the first column is the subjects' id): SubID G1 G2 G3 G4 W1 W2 W3 W4 1 6 5 6 2 6 2 2 4 2 6 4 7 2 6 6 2 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5

any news? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Emin Hasanov <emin@hasanov.com> Date: May 10, 2006 11:50 AM Subject: Fwd: ?????????? To: Rovshan Baghirov <rovshanb@gmail.com> Rovshan, how would you estimate this work in terms of manhours? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Anar Ibrahimov < anar@autostar.az> Date: May 10, 2006 11:22 AM Subject: ??????????

Move base / limit accessors into desc.h, where they properly belong. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> Index: linux-2.6.13/include/asm-i386/system.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.13.orig/include/asm-i386/system.h 2005-08-08 17:58:03.000000000 -0700 +++ linux-2.6.13/include/asm-i386/system.h 2005-08-08 18:01:31.000000000 -0700

Move base / limit accessors into desc.h, where they properly belong. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> Index: linux-2.6.13/include/asm-i386/system.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.13.orig/include/asm-i386/system.h 2005-08-08 17:58:03.000000000 -0700 +++ linux-2.6.13/include/asm-i386/system.h 2005-08-08 18:01:31.000000000 -0700

Move base / limit accessors into desc.h, where they properly belong. Patch-base: 2.6.13-rc5-mm1 Patch-keys: i386 desc cleanup Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> Index: linux-2.6.13/include/asm-i386/system.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.13.orig/include/asm-i386/system.h 2005-08-09 20:17:26.000000000 -0700 +++

Hello, First of all I am french, so please forgive me, if there are some big language mistakes in my sentences. I think, it is the good mail address to send my question, if not please tell me and forgive me. I am working on a project, and I use the nnet library. Our customers do not want us to install R on their machine, so we just use R for making the training of our neurons network. This

Move base / limit accessors into desc.h, where they properly belong. Patch-base: 2.6.13-rc5-mm1 Patch-keys: i386 desc cleanup Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> Index: linux-2.6.13/include/asm-i386/system.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.13.orig/include/asm-i386/system.h 2005-08-09 20:17:26.000000000 -0700 +++

Hello, First of all I am french, so please forgive me, if there are some big language mistakes in my sentences. I do not know if it is the good mail address to send my question, if not please tell me and forgive me, I have also sent this quetion to r-help, because the answer could be known from the programmers and the other R users :). I am working on a project, and I use the nnet library.

Airon, I don't think you have to find an English computer 'cause the following must work in your Chinese one :-) Let me explain. First of all, change your lines to xdata <- ckhdat$Adj..Close[1:1447] #names(ckhdwt.la8) <- c("w1", "w2", "w3", "w4", "w5","w6", "v6") note the # sign, i.e., DO NOT change the names

Hi Rui, Peter, You know I'm enabling the "clang-cl + lld-link" toolchain for Uefi firmware. I meet a problem that the lld-link fails to link 32bits assembly functions, but can link 64bits assembly functions successfully. I need your suggestion. Below is an example to show my problem in linux. The example has two only source files: main.c and foo.nasm. $ cat main.c void Foo (void);

Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed Warning: (mail.htm.exe, mail.zip). Warning: Please read the "CYBERNET-Attachment-Warning.txt" attachment(s) for more information. :Ts?[??50?[cW????????#???y?V?-?Ju ???&h????? ?? S^ij7??F???????&??E?4?S??b*?????????l?P0???8#?S??$?????*??h???z??OeLd?1K?? ???????]^}#! 8x?????2~V

All, If we can speculatively execute a load instruction, why isn’t it safe to hoist it out by promoting it to a scalar in LICM pass? There is a comment in LICM pass that if a load/store is conditional then it is not safe because it would break the LLVM concurrency model (See commit 73bfa4a). It has an IR test for checking this in test/Transforms/LICM/scalar-promote-memmodel.ll However, I have

--l4Siqd0eqV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, I run the following job. Please, compare the results of summary and table concerning berufl. From similar SPSS/PSPP runs, the result of table is correct. Did I misunderstand anything or is there a bug? What does the difference come from? What does '(other)' mean? What about the strange