similar to: swat?

> On 2015-01-06, Keith Keller wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:37:46AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> 2. If someone comes up with a place to get said data, THEN we could >>> properly publish that data in some way. >> >> It would be a hack, but you could probably subscribe an automated >> account to the enterprise-watch-list mailing list:

This is my patch for MSVC 2008 and it was applied by Chris: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080512/062390.html I tested it and it is ok for the 2.3 release. Razvan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tanya Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 7:40 AM

As I saw from the mailing list the MSVC 2005 patches were made to take into account the new files from the development branch, files which are not in the 2.3 release. So for now the below patch is the only one functional for the release. If I am wrong, please someone correct me. If someone can make a 2005 patch for the release branch, it is ok. Else, I am afraid that this one is for now the

I tried to compile on Windows ( using the win32/llvm.sln in MSVC Express 2008 ) the new 2.3 branch and here are the results: 1. I needed to copy the file Configure.exe.embed.manifest to Configure.exe.intermediate.manifest . This is a bug from the previous llvm release (2.2) 2. I copied the file SimplifyLibCalls.cpp from lib/Transforms/Scalar to lib/Transforms/IPO. I think the position of

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 13.01.2015 04:25, Somers-Harris, David | David | OPS wrote: >> On 2015-01-06, Keith Keller wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:37:46AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> 2. If someone comes up with a place to get said data, THEN >>>> we could properly publish that data in some way. >>> >>>

On Nov 20, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Ghitulete Razvan <razvan.ghitulete at gmail.com> wrote: > <inline asm>:1:2: error: ambiguous instructions require an explicit > suffix (could be 'btsw', 'btsl', or 'btsq') > bts $14,(%eax) This has come up before <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/vomnIQjefzA>. I don't recall if there was a

On Nov 20, 2013, at 4:11 PM, Ghitulete Razvan <razvan.ghitulete at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Stephen Checkoway <s at pahtak.org> wrote: >> >> This has come up before <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/vomnIQjefzA>. I don't recall if there was a resolution. >> > > Thanks for the link, completely missed

On Nov 20, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Stephen Checkoway <s at pahtak.org> wrote: > > On Nov 20, 2013, at 4:11 PM, Ghitulete Razvan <razvan.ghitulete at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Stephen Checkoway <s at pahtak.org> wrote: >>> >>> This has come up before <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/vomnIQjefzA>. I

Razvan, You're somewhat misinterpreting the GPL license. Using binutils as a dependency of LLVM does not require that they be linked into any distributable that might contain proprietary code. They can be shipped as separate, purely-GPL'd executables that are called via the command line, thereby avoiding the whole "infection" problem. This is, for instance, how

I verified the patch and it compiles all the targets, both in Debug and Release modes. If there is no someone else to keep the MSVC projects files updated, I will try from time to time to update them and to add the new targets. Maybe a note must be put in "docs/GettingStartedVS.html" at the Requirements section that llvm needs now MSVC (Express) 2008 to compile. Razvan -----

> This is my patch for MSVC 2008 and it was applied by Chris: > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080512/062390.html > > I tested it and it is ok for the 2.3 release. I don't believe I can apply this patch. There have been several patches applied recently to TOT to allow MSVC 2005 which I think many people are using. Does this patch mean that one

Hello: Skype for Linux version 4 has recently been released. An RPM package has been made, and it's mentioned in the Wiki: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Skype#head- a08dbc518378653842007a2eec37bc32e13c0bd0 However, Microsoft claims to prohibit redistribution of Skype (http://www.skype.com/intl/en-us/legal/terms/tou/ , subsection 4.2). My feeling is that the Wiki shouldn't mention

On May 19, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Razvan Aciu wrote: > I tested this pre-release on MSVC and I noted that none of the > submitted > patches (mine or others) were applied. > So the llvm 2.3 will not compile out of the box in MSVC? > Please provide me with a link to the patch(s) that need to be applied (llvm-commits archive email). I only apply patches that have been sent to me and

On May 13, 2008, at 10:04 PM, Razvan Aciu wrote: > Thanks for your replies. This is indeed a helpful mailing list. I > made some > more researches about the licensing issue and this is what I > discovered: > For now, I think for a commercial developer who wants to create a > complete > compiler toolchain using llvm, trying to package its compiler with > GCC is a

Hi guys , I'm writing in the mailing list for asking if tou know some script or system linke Mrtg for see the bandwitch usage of every mountpoin. Thanks Pierpaolo Gull?

Hi, i'm trying to complîle and install ices2 on my linux slackawre box : After leting make runnins a while , i got these errors ... Would tou help me to solve please ? I have just grabbed ices from cvs. In file included from input.c:29: input.h:34: parse error before "shout_t" input.h:34: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union input.h:36: parse error before '}'

Hi guys, I am trying to compile some files using clang + llvm and I am encountering the following error during the linking step: <inline asm>:1:2: error: ambiguous instructions require an explicit suffix (could be 'btsw', 'btsl', or 'btsq') bts $14,(%eax) Which basically does not make any sense, because I don't have the mentioned inline assembly in any

Hello, I'm using samba-2.2.8a and this conf file : [global] netbios name = Moua7 workgroup = EPI server string = Moua7 - FreeBSD 4.8 guest account = samba security = share name resolve order = bcast create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 os level = 255 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes wins support = Yes [partage] comment = Dossier de partage

Hi, I hate to stress you guys, i already posted a few messages about this but i am still confused about what's going on. Windows (here XP but i think others as well) is unable to see my list of shares when i have security=user! how come? how can i fix this? Thanks angain, Razvan Rotaru

hy i want to create with rails an app that list process with informations like pid ,memory allocated , time .... can tou help me -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.