similar to: Microsoft Access & Samba 2.0.3 - Can't open database

Hello Friends, Does anybody have the solution to the problem reported by Richard below? Is anyone else having problems using Microsoft Access97 to access database files via Samba 2.0.3? When I attempt to open the Access database from my unix account via Samba, I get the Microsoft message: Microsoft Access was unable to open the Visual Basic porject for this database. Another

Hi, I'm running Samba 2.0.4b on a Debian Linux (v2.2) PC. If I look at the "log.smb" file there are many messages: Attempt to locate null printername! Internal error? We have a number of print queues defined and they work fine. Here is a portion of the /etc/printcap: ================================================= # # Copyright (c) 1983 Regents of the University of California.

Hi, I'm running Samba 2.0.4b on a Debian Linux (v2.2) PC. If I look at the "log.nmb" file there are many messages: [1999/10/25 08:39:19, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:query_name_response(95) query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet 130.199.xxx.yyy for name WORK<1d>. This response was from IP 130.199.xxx.zzz The frequency is every 5 minutes.

Hey, digest 2286 incomplete, only first 3 topics contained. Can I get a new copy ? Thanks, Hans-Joerg Glock > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: samba@samba.org [SMTP:samba@samba.org] > Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 27. Oktober 1999 22:12 > An: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA > Betreff: SAMBA digest 2286 > > SAMBA Digest 2286 > > For information on

I installed samba-1.9.18p8 on our RS6000 running AIX: 4.2.1.0 with xlC: 3.1.4.0. There are 5 errors reported in "util.c" and 2 errors reported in "server.c", all about "Function argument assignment between types "unsigned long*" and "int*" is not allowed." I use encrypted passwords and have a smbpasswd password file in the ususal place. I can

I am running samba-2.0.3-8 on Redhat 6.2 in five global locations. All are fine except one. In this location when a user runs MS Visual Developer they are able to open, save compile and edit files just fine. However when they type either [Enter] or [Bkspc] to add or delete a line, in this case only MSVD hangs for several seconds. Insert several lines and wait 1+ minutes!!! I have watched the

> -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Boucher [mailto:tboucher@abio.com] > Sent: Friday, October 08, 1999 10:57 AM > To: 'samba@samba.org' > Subject: FW: Microsoft Visual Dev Studio > > > > > > Well hello there all, > > > > Thank you all for Samba ! With out it our development > > environment would be much harder to manage.

samba@samba.org "Chris" <chrisv@satl.com> "Chris" <chrisv@satl.com> thomas.heiligenmann@t-online.de (Thomas Heiligenmann) thomas.heiligenmann@t-online.de (Thomas Heiligenmann) Jeremy Allison <jeremy@valinux.com> Jeremy Allison <jeremy@valinux.com> David Collier-Brown - Sun Canada <davecb@scot.canada.sun.com> Subba Rao

Hi All: I have a Debian 2.1 system running Samba 2.0.4 which works fine with Win95/98/NT4.0 but does not show the samba shares when the client is Win2k. You can mount the share OK even though it has a little red tail in the Windows Explorer, just can't browse to mount it. Do I have a problem or should I be patient and it will be fixed in the new samba release??? Thanks, Richard Hogue

I'm having problems using Microsoft Access 2000 mdb files on a Samba share. The same database worked very well on a Windows server. I had hoped Samba would be a drop in replacement for a Windows server but apparently Access needs special Samba configuration. In Access I sometimes get Run-time error '3035': System resource exceeded. I don't see any errors in the log file when

Hi, I've a question about a problem using a samba share in a UNIX AIX server. In my scenarious there is a fileNET server (running on a win2000 server) which use a samba share on a AIX sever for cacheing file, this share is configured for allow access to a particular user (pangol). It seams that user have access permission but an error is returned when fileNET try to write a file. Thanks in

Email : miro@space-comm.com FirstName : Miroslav LastName : Nachev Company : COSMOS Software Enterprises, Ltd. Phone : (+359-88) 897-31-95 Fax : Address : P. O. Box 941 Address2 : City : Sofia State : Outside the US, Mexico, or Canada Zip/Postal

I am new to Wine. I have just installed it using RPM and I put all the DLL files (I was asked for by Wine) in the same folder as MSAccess. I get an error when I am launching Access97: "Microsoft Access can't start because there is no license for it on this machine" How can I get this to go away? Apollo

All, Please help me defend Samba. We are having major performance problems when using VisualStudio to build projects. The source lives on the server, and the intermediate files are dumped locally to try to speed things up. One of the engineers downloaded a demo of NetManage/Chameleon NFS and it was significantly faster. Here are some numbers: samba-1.9.18p8 samba-1.9.18p8

I create a shared directory in linux redhat v5.1 and y change the samba configuration file for share this directory for users in windows 95, i copy an acces97 database that will accessed by the users through a visual basic v5 program made by me, all the users are in the same area conected via twisted-pair cable and the most far computer is about 39 ft, in all cases i don't think that my net

Hi, We have a large (8 CPUs, 32GB RAM) x86 Sun server running x8664 Debian Lenny, with Samba 2:3.2.5-4lenny6. It's a BDC and file server. I have noticed various entries in the log files that I'd like to understand better. Some machines are generating this: [2009/11/16 15:10:49, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2019) call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x9005c): Currently not implemented.

hello everyone I am running suse9.0 with samba 2.2.8 kernel 2.4.23, the app is in vb6 using the vb jetengine to access access97 databases, roughly 15 of them all between 200 - 900 megs in size, all on the same shared drive. This arrangement works well on our NT4 server. but when we try to use linux/samba we find read/writing is incrediably slow. as an example our standard test on NT4 takes 4

gid=500) (pid 30102) [2000/11/30 10:44:37, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2516) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. uname -a: Linux ***** 2.2.14-5.0smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 7 21:01:40 EST 2000 i686 unknown smbd -V: Version 2.0.7 nmbd -V: Version 2.0.7 rpm -a -q | grep samba: samba-common-2.0.7-4 samba-client-2.0.7-4 samba-2.0.7-4 ls -l samba*: -rw-rw-r-- 4312642 Oct 18 11:54

gid=500) (pid 30102) [2000/11/30 10:44:37, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2516) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. uname -a: Linux ***** 2.2.14-5.0smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 7 21:01:40 EST 2000 i686 unknown smbd -V: Version 2.0.7 nmbd -V: Version 2.0.7 rpm -a -q | grep samba: samba-common-2.0.7-4 samba-client-2.0.7-4 samba-2.0.7-4 ls -l samba*: -rw-rw-r-- 4312642 Oct 18 11:54

I've been running SAMBA 1.9.14 and 1.9.17p4 for successfully for some time. Recently I thought it would be useful to update to the latest SAMBA version 1.9.18p7. This is the first time we are using Samba with the built-in DES. Here is our configuration: Machines: IBM RS/6000 AIX 4.1.4.0 or AIX 4.2.1.0 Compiler: xlC 3.1.4.0 My smb.conf file: [global] printing = aix print command