similar to: Summary: SAMBA requesting to be a master browser....

We are running samba 1.9.16p11, and seem to be doing just fine. Last Month, our IT dept informed us that our machine was attempting to be a master browser, which the NT Wins server was not happy about. Below is my global config options. When I killed/restarted the samba daemons (running as daemons and not via inetd) the problem seem to vanish. Feeling this was a fluke, it was dismissed.

We have a network of apx 200 NT's,W95 & W98 using an NT machine for WINS resolution. Our dept has apx 15 W95/W98 machines hooked to a hub off a switch from the main network. I would like to setup SAMBA to act as a WIN server for just these machines. Is it possible to do without changing subnets? Now to complicate the question. Network login is done via an NT machine as well. If we

Running samba 1.9.16p11 on Digital Unix 3.2c. We currently access unix shares from W95 without problems but now since we had our network overhauled, 2 MSDOS harddriveless PC's need to be able to access the unix system for it's hard drive. They have Intel Express cards . How do I setup the MSDOS computer to map a drive to SAMBA. One question is these computers do not have IP addresses, how

I don't think there is anything that can be done but.... In our Unix shares, we have multiple (hundreds) of filenames that have "*" in their names, which really messes up W95 when I attempt to display the contents of those shares. Is SAMBA not passing the filenames correctly or W95 is just not reading them correctly? Any ideas? on either side. (except changing the filenames to not

Hello. First, I am sorry to bother you. I found your email through doing a search on sites related to Switzerland and their related sites. I am a musician (guitarist/singer) as well as other things :-) and I have a website: www.rezamusic.com which I'd like to share with you -- it's a personal site, not a commercial one. It offers many topics, some of which you might find interesting. My

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 03:15:43PM +0000, Johnny Hughes wrote: > CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2015:0958 > > Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-0958.html Awww... and there I was hoping they'd finally backported TLS1.2. But, nope, just a newer CA list. Ah well :-( -- rgds Stephen

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:09:14PM -0600, Leroy Tennison wrote: > The stunnel package doesn't come with an init script and systemctl > doesn't list it as a service I recognize, I guess I could put it in > /etc/rd.d/rc.local or create a script in /etc/rc.d/init.d but > thought I'd ask before creating my own solution. stunnel wraps a plaintext service in an SSL session.

Hello all, I still have a patch for #3438 (eager loading doesn''t respect association orders); it passes all unit tests, and has additional unit tests with full coverage. The patch is attached. == The Bug == Author.find(1).posts != Author.find(1, :include => [:posts]).posts if Author has_many :posts, :order => anything. This means that either one must avoid eager loading or

I did have a verbose description of why but rather then make everyone's eyes bleed with useless details I ask the following :) To make a long story short: How can I make newmcReg[[i]]["PreIO308"] go away in the following list... er vector... no wait array.... dataframe.... awww crap... summary(newmcReg[[i]]) UNITBUILD UNITDB ITBUILD ITDB Mode :logical

Hey all, Does anyone know of an existing project that acts as a file broswer for files/directories on the server. I need to implement something for my students to be able to access their unix home drives on our server via the web. It doesn''t sound that hard to do the actual file listing and accessing in ruby. Authenticating the users could be tricky (PAM?). It could be done, but

I am having broswer problems. Currently running 1.9.16.p11 on Solaris 2.51. I see the workgroup, CADCAM, in Explorer on a pc. But, when browsing CADCAM, the '+' sign goes away and nothing shows up under the group. PC's can still map the shares ok. My smb.conf entry is: browseable = yes workgroup = CADCAM Do I need to put something in the lmhosts file? Thanks, Garrett Curtis

Here is my situation: I have an AIX 4.3.3 machine, that I have compiled open-ldap, kerberos5 (1.3..6), and Samba 3.0.20. Here is my smb.conf file: [global] realm = REGION.DOMAIN.COM security = ADS password server = randomdc.region.domain.com workgroup = REGION client use spnego = yes ;winbind separator = \ [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = no create mode = 0750

On 11/12/15 13:00, Alan Hughes wrote: > Folks > > > I've managed (due to me being fat-fingered that morning) to get a DNS zone in a Samba-4 DNS setup screwed up. > > > Basically I was trying to add a new A record to an internal domain "e2eservices.co.uk" using the MS administration tools (not the samba-tool CLI). However instead of adding the entry

Its should not be needed to drop and recreate. Try the following. Delete the created records in the "wrong" zone(s) Try to delete the "wrong" zone. ( ignore the error) Restart bind Restart samba. Pray and check again. Are the "empty zones gone and are your dns records there again? Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2015:0958 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-0958.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 610d1b0af152950747452839f7e8cae7840983906a8e0d64dc2e67fa924441f5 openssl-0.9.8e-34.el5_11.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2015:0958 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-0958.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 610d1b0af152950747452839f7e8cae7840983906a8e0d64dc2e67fa924441f5 openssl-0.9.8e-34.el5_11.i386.rpm

Thanks for the suggestion, however it is not a seperate zone, i.e. it appears to be a part of the "e2eservices.co.uk" zone with child objects (analogous to "_tcp" and "_udp" in a domain zone).   Alan   -----Original message----- From:Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> Sent:Fri 11-12-2015 13:16 Subject:Re: [Samba] Samba-4 DNS issue To:samba at lists.samba.org;

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1213 --- Comment #37 from Daniel Richard G. <skunk at iSKUNK.ORG> 2011-11-25 12:40:45 EST --- Yet another failure mode... [...] # XXX.YYY.ZZ.8 SSH-2.0-Sun_SSH_1.1.3 # XXX.YYY.ZZ.9 SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_3.8.1p1 # XXX.YYY.ZZ.14 SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_4.3 # 10.10.1.35 SSH-2.0-RomSShell_4.62 Received disconnect from 10.10.1.35: 2: Protocol Timeout make: ***

I apologize in advance if this has been asked on the list already, but trying to find an answer to my question on the archives has been like trying to find a needle in a haystack... I'm trying to implement cross-subnet workgroup browsing. The domain master browser for the workgroup is a Samba box (2.0.6) acting also as a WINS server. All was well during our initial testing phases when Windows

I changed the ip on my samba 3.0.4 server from using dhcpd allotted 192.168.0.165 to a static 192.168.0.5 Now my windows clients get a message: 'the specified domain either does not exist or could not be contacted' but it is contacting the domain because otherwise it would have given me an error saying it can't find it. I have done a gg: search to no avail please help i am goining on