similar to: NT test of smbmount

Hi! I am experiencing strange smbmount problems with my 3 computers. I have: janeway, an NT 4.0 SP5 box, torres, a Linux box running kernel 2.0.36 and samba 2.0.5a, q, a Linux box running kernel 2.0.36. Both Linux machines have smbfs compiled as a module and loaded. I can smbmount janeway shares on both torres and q, and I can see torres shares on janeway. Naturally, q can't be seen by

Hi! I have a new machine on a network: kemmer: New Linux box (kernel 2.0.36. Samba 1.9.18p10) torres: old Linux box (kernel 2.0.36. Samba 1.9.18p10) janeway: Windows NT 4.0 SP4. torres and janeway are performing flawlessly, I can access both machine's shares from the other one. kemmer is new and can't access DNS yet. Thus, I have to use the -I switch to smbclient and smbmount to access

Samba 2.0.5a smbfs 2.0.1 linux 2.0.36 (RedHat 5.2) encrypted passwords in /etc/smbpasswd When I try to mount a share with my correct Samba password, I get: smb_dont_catch_keepalive: server->data_ready == NULL mount error: Invalid argument Please look at smbmount's manual page for possible reasons Then once I accidentally used my UNIX password, and it works. O?O Why? Shouldn't it

I get the following error when trying to mount a Windows 95 machine from my Linux machine (RedHat4.2, 2.0.30) [Samba version 1.9.16p11]. smb_get_length: Invalid NBT packet smb_dont_catch_keepalive: server->data_ready == NULL smb_dont_catch_keepalive: server->data_ready == NULL My command line argument is: $ smbmount //printser/test /mnt/test I have also tried -c, -U, -P options and get

My Linux box just bit the dust in a dramatic fashion (complete lockup, needed a cold reboot). Although I am not at all sure what the cause was, the last message in the system log mentioned samba, and there are some other funny looking samba-related messages in there. I'm not asking for a diagnostic, but if anyone has seen these before, maybe they can tell me what they mean: Last message

A friend of mine is running Samba (samba-2.0.3-8) on a couple RedHat Linux 6.0 machines. He is sharing files bilaterally at work with a WinNT machine and at home with a Win9x machine. In both places, he is getting a large number of SMB error messages. I'm not sure whether these are from the smbfs (smbmount) or from the Windoze machines accessing the Linux drives, though I suspect the

Hi all, when i try to smbmount an WinNT shared drive, i get the following message: mount error: Invalid argument And in my logfile i get at this time: Nov 9 18:02:33 linux3 kernel: smb_dont_catch_keepalive: server->data_ready == NULL On my other linux-system i can mount with the same command without any problems. have anyone an idea?? thx bye Sven

Hi, I am new to Linux, I am using RedHat version 6.0 and Samba 2.0.5a. I try to set up a Samba Server for a LAN. So far everything (i.e. installation) worked fine, I installed samba from .rpm and nmbd, smbd is started at boot successfully. I can see the Samba server in the Windows95 network environment, but when I doubleclick on it or when I try to smbmount a service from another Linux machine I

Cuando intento conectarme a un recurso de un NT desde Linux, lo hago con la siguiente l?nea de ordenes: Linux:/#smbmount //server/recurso /punto_de_anclaje /I IP_del_server -C -U Administrador <RET> password:passwd_del_Administrador<RET> mount error:invalid argument Please look at smbmount?s manual page for possible reasons En la consola del servidor Linux sale por pantalla.

Hi! I am using smbfs to mount a NT 4.0 SP3 disk to a Linux 2.0.33 box (SuSE 5.1). This works most of the time. Sometimes, I get a syslog entry |Jun 26 23:03:10 palandt kernel: smb_dont_catch_keepalive: server->data_ready == NULL on the smbmount command, which subsequently fails "illegal parameter". What am I doing wrong? I currently can't browse the digest archives because my

Can someone tell me where to find what error messages mean or enlighten me as to what smb_dont_catch_keepalive: server->data_ready == NULL means ? Many thanks Ian

Hi all, I have observed in kernel 4.15 cifs.ko using protocol v2.1 getting confused about whether a "filesystem object" is a file or a directory. The true state in the example below is that "Alien" is directory and "alien" is a (perl) file. However, 'file' reports the type to be the same and matching the first object accessed, e.g. Both are perl

hi, i would like to allow access to specific samba shares, where the windows domain user is NOT authenticated against the share with it's username, but with a membership of a given windows-group. example: windows-domain user "test01" --> which is a member of windows domain group "smb_test01" --> which gets mapped to the unix-group "smb01" --> which is

Hello All, As per the subject, we have recently joined a w2k3 domain folowing instructions on wiki as well as well as relying on valuble information on the list. The steps we took were the following: Join samba as secondary Created dns records by hand (ldbsearch, samba-tool dns add) Checked replication Copied sysvol Transferred some roles from windows Transferred some roles from samba (fsmo

Hi, I have a small problem with Samba in Debian 2.1 (Slink), kernel 2.0.36 and samba 2.0.5. I have a NT Server and a Linux client. I want to get some files from NT Server to the Linux client. They are in the same network and the IP's are: NT Server - 222.222.222.2 Linux Client - 222.222.222.40 Reading samba docs I discover two small utilities:

Hi there, I have finally talked a corporation into allowing me to introduce Unix. I have used samba before, but I now have a problem. Some (and only some) of the windows 98 clients can no longer log into the NT domain controller. They get the same message as if the passwd/username was wrong. Here is a snip from my config file: os level=00 password server=nt_box domain master=no local

Hi everybody, I have tested CTDB+GFS2+CMAN under Debian. It works good but I do not understand some points. It is possible to run the CTDB defining it under services section in cluster.conf but running it on the second node shuts down the process at the first one. My CTDB configuration implies 2 active-active nodes. Does CTDB care if the node starts with clean_start="0" or

On 01/03/16 23:16, Chad William Seys wrote: > Hi Rowland, > >> Are you using sssd or nslcd ? > I am using sssd. I can ssh into the server using credentials from either > kerberos realm. > E.g. > ssh cwseys at PHYSICS.WISC.EDU@smb01.physics.wisc.edu > (works) > ssh seys at AD.WISC.EDU@smb01.physics.wisc.edu > (works) > > PHYSICS.WISC.EDU is an MIT kerberos

Hi Rowland, > Are you using sssd or nslcd ? I am using sssd. I can ssh into the server using credentials from either kerberos realm. E.g. ssh cwseys at PHYSICS.WISC.EDU@smb01.physics.wisc.edu (works) ssh seys at AD.WISC.EDU@smb01.physics.wisc.edu (works) PHYSICS.WISC.EDU is an MIT kerberos KDC. AD.WISC.EDU is a active directory KDC (etc). The reason I thought sssd would be best is because

From: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com> >From preread, prewrite and preexec callbacks we will send the KVMI_EVENT_PF events caused by access rights enforced by the introspection tool. Signed-off-by: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com> Co-developed-by: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com> Signed-off-by: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com>