Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "I am confused. Chmod / chown issues?"
2013 May 05
1
Why?? NFS cached permissions groups etc
An hour of my life disapeared and my beautiful uptime was rebooted and it was
fixed by reading
http://serverfault.com/questions/98900/is-a-reboot-required-to-refresh-permissio
ns-after-adding-a-user-to-a-new-group
#/home is mounted from a NFS export
[jpyeron at node000 ~]$ cat /tmp/jobs/foo.txt ~jobs/test.txt ~jobs/userstest.txt
afasdasd
cat: /home/jobs/test.txt: Permission denied
Sun May 5
2016 Sep 22
3
VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliance statement
Can my jpyeron user be blessed to update the WIKI, so a CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 VPAT can be posted?
Recommending under FAQ or AdditionalResources
-Jason
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:jpyeron at pdinc.us]
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 14:08
> To: 'centos-devel at centos.org'
> Subject: VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliance statement
>
2008 Feb 21
3
Huge mailq
Where should we start on preventing this type of problem?
[root at server34 mqueue]# find | wc -l
185259
-jason
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 -
- +1 (443) 269-1555
2016 Sep 22
2
VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliancestatement
Did you work this via the CentOS Board to make sure its ok to post ?
Regards
On 22/09/16 19:44, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron .
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: centos-docs-bounces at centos.org
>> [mailto:centos-docs-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron
>> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 14:39
2014 Dec 04
1
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Ricles
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:42
>
> Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by
> that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can
> use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license.
But you will still need a (self?) support plan to be STIG compliant.
>
2016 Sep 22
1
VPAT for centos 7 - section 508compliancestatement
let me chase that up,
I dont really understand what a VPAT might be, looks to be US centric -
but it also looks like it aims to make assertions on and from the CentOS
project side. best to work it via the board first.
Regards
On 22/09/16 22:27, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> I posted on the dev list last October, no feedback.
>
> How (did not seem to be a high level issue for board concern, it
2014 Dec 04
3
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Ricles
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:23
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox fails to authenticate .mil
> sites with New DoDCAC
>
> I thought DoD used RHEL and not Centos, or did Centos did approved
> DADEMS recently?
DADMS is a Navy system, but yes Centos is approved for use by DISA. You would
2014 Dec 04
2
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:41 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote:
> Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by
> that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can
> use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license.
I would recommend RHEL for critical systems or those that must be
certified for a particular purpose, such as CA servers.
2010 Dec 09
4
5.5 x86_64 live cd
In the bang head and repeat mode here.
The live usb partition is /dev/sda1
Reboot / power on
It auto mounts the /dev/sda2 as ext4 on /mnt/disc/sda2
$ umount /mnt/disc/sda2
$ mkdir /root/foo
$ mke2fs /dev/sda2
$ mount /dev/sda2 /root/foo
Kernel panic
Snip from the kernel panic:
??????
list_del+0xb/0x71
cache_alloc_refill+0xf1/0x186
ext2_fill_super+0x0/0xa37
....
system_call+0x7e/0x83
--
2015 Feb 18
6
[Bug 11101] New: support writing to devices
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11101
Bug ID: 11101
Summary: support writing to devices
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.6
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assignee: wayned at samba.org
Reporter: jpyeron at
2009 Apr 02
17
[OT] Godaddy hell...
Can I get some recommendations:
We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with
1: SLA
2: SSH access
3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source.
Would like them to include http/https and email.
Any suggestions?
-Jason
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-
2010 Aug 01
2
/bin/su wont work inside a chroot?
On centos 4 (i386 chroot on an x86_64) it just prompts me for a password.
Any suggesstion on where to start looking?
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 -
- +1 (443)
2014 Dec 04
1
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 13:09 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote:
> That is true, which we are using ours for critical things. Guess RHEL
> will be the way to go till Centos is maybe approved for critical
> systems as well.
That's really up to the program manager in which the machine would be
used. He would make a determination whether it's supportable and
maintainable, based on in-house
2015 Jan 15
2
leap second and Centos
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akemi Yagi
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 12:05
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:43 AM, G Galitz <geoff at galitz.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > We have another leap second coming. Have past bugs with
> Centos and leap
> > seconds (specifically high CPU spikes) been resolved?
> Should we be worried?
2007 Nov 14
3
Sso the Linux way?
So I was googling around about this over the last week and here is what I
found:
nis/yp is for some reason bad.
Kerbos is holy, but no how-to's that don't involve windows and active
directory.
What is the recommended sso approach for centos? Where are there examples /
docs to follow?
Jason
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-
2011 Mar 21
1
Redelivery of 2 day old mail from this list?
Any ideas? This one would make the 10th email received.
Return-Path: <centos-bounces at centos.org>
Received: from psmtp.com (exprod8mx192.postini.com [64.18.3.171])
by mail.pdinc.us (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id p2LKkur4025229
for <jpyeron at pdinc.us>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:46:57 -0400
Received: from source ([72.26.200.202]) by exprod8mx192.postini.com
([64.18.7.10]) with
2007 Sep 11
2
Downgrade samba?
After reading http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2003-November/001828.html
what would the best approach for downgrading samba-3.0.10-1.4E.12.2 to 2.7
on centos4, then later upgrading back to current?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
2011 Feb 28
1
Dhcp 3.0.5 on 5.x
I am looking to use the update-conflict-detection false; directive in the
dhcpd.conf.
It is supported in EL6 or and dhcp >=3.1.0a1.
Since I am not going to get permission to switch to EL6 or dhcp 3.1 what are my
options?
Background:
I have a DNS/DHCPD system which its conf files are generated automagically.
Depending on which network a device is on the ip address will change. It is
always
2020 Apr 19
5
[Off topic] sending mail from Comcast was: Sendmail not working
> -----Original Message-----
> From: S.Bob
> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 2:26 PM
> To: centos at centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] [Off topic] sending mail from Comcast was: Sendmail not working
>
> I followed this guide:
>
>
> https://pepipost.com/tutorials/install-sendmail-server-centos-7/
Sigh - bad examples for you.... undo if you can.
Postfix provides the
2020 Apr 19
3
[Off topic] sending mail from Comcast was: Sendmail not working
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Evans
> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 12:50 PM
>
> On 4/19/20 12:38 PM, S.Bob wrote:
> >
> > On 4/19/20 10:36 AM, Tim Evans wrote:
> >> On 4/19/20 12:28 PM, S.Bob wrote:
> >>> All;
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I installed sendmail via yum, but if I test it like this:
> >>>