similar to: Re SMS under samba

> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 17:02:35 -0500 > From: "Tom Hallewell" <hallewellt@rfa.org> > To: <samba@samba.org> > Subject: SMS under samba > Message-ID: <002501be65c1$8becad70$6b021eac@banger.rfa.org> > > Is anyone aware of a way to do server-based software management/installation > on Win95 clients in a samba environment? My co-workers are

Hi TOm, I know it this doesn't really help your SMS problem, but it does help SQL. Oracle just accounced support for Linux and they said they are going to release a free version of ORACLE for Linux. Johan >Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 17:02:35 -0500 >From: "Tom Hallewell" <hallewellt@rfa.org> >To: <samba@samba.org> >Subject: SMS under samba >Message-ID:

Not sure if this is the right forum to post this, but here goes- I am very curious about samba-tng-alpha.0.0. Does it recognize NT group ID's? Has the WINS-flooding bug been fixed in the CVS version? Can I work around the problem by running the 2.06 version of nmb instead of the tng one? We have been running samba at Radio Free Asia for around 2 years now, and are thrilled with it. We have

Hi- I am experiencing some odd behavior with ACLs with winbindd using Samba 2.6 on Debian Woody (kernel version 2.4.18). 1. I am unable to alter permissions from Win2K clients using the Properties->Security interface. Is this normal? I get the "Unable to save Permission Changes on new Folder. Access is denied." message. This occurs with all accounts, both privileged and

dear samba users and developers, i'd like to put to you a proposal for your respectful consideration: it is an idea that i believe has strategic merit for the open source community and OS users as a whole. these words are chosen carefully and the reasons will become apparent later: that i begin as an example. as you are no doubt aware, there have been some seriously damaging (but not

I had a similar issue on my Debian box. It seemed that setfacl didn't care for special characters. I changed the separator character to - (dash) instead of + or \ and it worked fine. Good luck! Tom Hallewell Radio Free Asia Washington DC USA > > (offlist replies discontinued due to increasing large number of people > involved) > > Gareth Davies wrote: > >

I am delighted to be able to tell you that I have taken a decision to relinquish Copyright ownership of all Samba-related code that I have ever written. I would like to take this as an opportunity to formally request the Samba Team to reopen the case for forming an ASF-like "Samba Software Foundation". As you are no doubt aware, I started work on NT Domain analysis in 1997, with Paul

If you are using the debian/rules from apt-get or the source tarball, you need to not only include --with-acl-support in debian/rules, you also need to vi debian/config.cache --> replace "ac_cv_header_sys_acl_h=${ac_cv_header_sys_acl_h=no}" with "ac_cv_header_sys_acl_h=${ac_cv_header_sys_acl_h=yes}" This will allow it to compile. Unfortunately, for me,

Hi, well, I guess that this is something that I need to plan to do :-). I'm developing a plan for a group of updated docs for TNG (and Samba, compared to TNG). Quickly, you're asking for 1) A bulleted list? 2) A Kvivio flowchart? 3) Some other comparison? Could you tell me in general terms: do you need to "sell" TNG to the boss or something? I can't give it to you now.

Hello, first of all, this is a message corresponding to a thread named similar in tng-users mailinglist (tng-users@samba-tng.org). I am successfully running a samba-tng server at work for quite a year now but now I want to get to the "official" version (2.2.x) again for increased stability, namely in file locking issues. The samba-tng server is holding about 35 users along with their

FYI >Mailing-List: contact vulnwatch-help@vulnwatch.org; run by ezmlm >List-Post: <mailto:vulnwatch@vulnwatch.org> >List-Help: <mailto:vulnwatch-help@vulnwatch.org> >List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:vulnwatch-unsubscribe@vulnwatch.org> >List-Subscribe: <mailto:vulnwatch-subscribe@vulnwatch.org> >Delivered-To: mailing list vulnwatch@vulnwatch.org

update: - fixed smbd for win95-style profile-locating (it now works, thank you to everyone who sent in log files to get this fixed) - various modes tested and confirmed as working: * ROLE_STANDALONE security = user encrypt passwords = yes domain master = no domain logons = no * ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC security = user encrypt passwords = yes domain master = yes

OK: First, please respond to me directly, as I'm not on the TNG list. Here's the situation: I will be setting up a "computer lab" for 30-40 PC's with various users (students). Here are my needs: 1) One Touch (point) User administration (the simpler the better) 2) Simplest set of LINUX SW possible 3) NO NT PDC 4) All clients are W2K. 5) Want

Dear list I haven't been able to track down the cause of the following problems and hope someone can shed some light... We have been running samba-tng successfully on our school FreeBSD 4.5RELENG server for 18 months or so, but now need the facility of downloadable printer drivers for our W2k clients. I have installed samba 2.2.7a alongside our running samba-tng (2.6.1cvs) in a dual head

Hi, I posted this problem before in more detail (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=samba&m=104756899022766&w=2) but received no response. At the current state of Smaba 3.0 and Samba-TNG these two seem to be incomaptible. Samba 3.0 can't join a TNG controlled domain. I think this should affect a lot of installations as TNG as a controller and "stable" as file/printserver seem

Hello, We recently undertook to migrate our domain from samba-TNG to samba-2.2.2. However, it did not go smoothly. One of the main reasons is that even if you start 2.2.2 with the domain SID from the TNG installation, you find that the users' RIDs are different. This is because samba-TNG calculates the RID from the unix UID using the formula UID*4 + 1000 where as 2.2.2 uses UID*2 +1000. At

You should be able to find the server in W2K's server manager and confirm that it is a trusted member of the Domain. It sounds like smbd isn't linking to the acl libs-have you run ldd to see if you are linking to libacl.so.1? My recent problem was similar and I found that I wasn't compiling against the acl libs. Make sure you have the line (Max said you should have this before

It sounds like smbd isn't linking to the acl libs-have you run ldd against winbindd to see if it is linking to libacl.so.1? I recently had very similar symptoms running 2.2.7 under Debian and I found that I wasn't compiling against the acl libs. Make sure you have the line (this might work best if you put this line before --with-msdfs) --with-acl-support in debian/rules, Plus you have to

> > Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 12:50:10 -0600 > From: lustig hanna <lustig@rafael.co.il> > To: samba-bugs@anu.edu.au, samba@anu.edu.au > Subject: Samba printers > Message-ID: <36FD2862.9DED95F3@rafael.co.il> > > We are trying to define some printers from an NT work station defined > as a member in an NT domain. It's seems that samba has some problem in

I am running samba 2.0.6 under Linux and currently have around 2 dozen network printers that generally work fine served on samba. They are four differrent flavors of HP Lasers and I have the drivers on the server, everything's great-UNTIL...... We get a Tektronix color printer (Phaser 640 Plus). It's networking fine, actually prints fine, except only in Black and there is some