similar to: Can I make the IPC$ share guest ok?

Hello, I have a simple network where usernames are not needed and every PC/user is allowed to connect to the samba server. With security=share, guest ok=yes, guest only=yes, this works great. But when using the IPC share for e.g. setting the time, there is 2 second delay before there is a response, which I would like to avoid. It seems the problem is that the IPC share is never guest only, so

>> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:14:44 -0400 (EDT) >> schulz at adi.com (Thomas Schulz) wrote: >> >>>> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:14:32 -0400 (EDT) >>>> Thomas Schulz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We are running Samba 4.4.6 as a file server. >>>>> In the logs for a few client machines I

> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:14:44 -0400 (EDT) > schulz at adi.com (Thomas Schulz) wrote: > > > > On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:14:32 -0400 (EDT) > > > Thomas Schulz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > We are running Samba 4.4.6 as a file server. > > > > In the logs for a few client machines I see entries such as: >

Hopefully someone can put my mind at ease... I have about 10 W2K boxes with account lockout threshold of 5 failed logins and Additional Restrictions for Anonymous Connections set to 'No access w/o explicit anon. permissions' (Administrative Tools -> Security Settings -> Local Policies -> Security Options) I've set up a Samba server this week and in the past few days

> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:14:32 -0400 (EDT) > Thomas Schulz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > We are running Samba 4.4.6 as a file server. > > In the logs for a few client machines I see entries such as: > > > > [2016/09/29 22:36:58.862575, 0] > > ../source3/param/loadparm.c:4402(widelinks_warning) > > Share 'IPC$'

We are running Samba 4.4.6 as a file server. In the logs for a few client machines I see entries such as: [2016/09/29 22:36:58.862575, 0] ../source3/param/loadparm.c:4402(widelinks_warning) Share 'IPC$' has wide links and unix extensions enabled. These parameters are incompatible. Wide links will be disabled for this share. I assume that Share 'IPC$' is some sort of

MM = M Maki (1 Oct 2002) AB = Andrew Bartlett (2 Oct 2002) MM > I have a couple of Samba (2.0.7 & 2.2.0) servers I scanned with > Nessus and they reported a security hole of "Possible to login > to the remote host using a NULL session" I have a couple of NT > servers I disabled with a registry edit. Is there a way to > prevent this on the Samba

Hi Folks, Just installed Samba 2.2.10 on my FreeBSD 4.9 computer. I can see the FreeBSD box on all of my Win 9x boxes, but when I double click on its icon, I get a rude box message that says something like: ==================================================== You must supply a password to make this connection Resource: \\SAMMY\IPC$ ====================================================

Can anyone help on this matter in changing samba password: [d8tsjb0@as87500580 ~]$ smbpasswd Old SMB password: New SMB password: Retype new SMB password: read_socket_with_timeout: timeout read. read error = Connection reset by peer. Receiving SMB: Server stopped responding machine 127.0.0.1 rejected the tconX on the IPC$ share. Error was : Read error: Connection reset by peer. Failed

Probably an easy one for most of you: I'm trying to create nested groups on my Samba server. When running "net rpc group add" I am prompted for my root password and receive the error: "Failed to connect to IPC$ share on localhost". When I use my other login I receive: # net rpc group add Admins -L -U bill Enter bill's password: Failed to add alias 'Admins'

Hello, I have the following entries in /boot/loader.conf: kern.ipc.shm_use_phys="1" kern.ipc.semmns="500" kern.ipc.semmni="40" kern.ipc.semmap="500" which are set correctly. Unfortunately, the following two entries kern.ipc.shmmax="512000000" kern.ipc.shmall="65526" do not change the corresponding values according to

I'm not sure what broke my samba server, but I *used* to be able to distribute patches for software to my guests from my Samba server. Some time in between, I've upgraded Linux from 2.0.30 to 2.0.32, and I've upgraded the Samba RPM from whatever to 1.9.18p7. Now, I can't even browse the share list without logging on. Any idea what gives? Does anyone have this configuration working

Thanks, I recompiled following your instructions and it is now working. Thanks very much I forward to samba ML, so it could be a clue for people having same problem !!!! On Fri, 16 Oct 1998, Barlow, Graham K wrote: > Add the option below to your FLAGS1= line in the compile options and > 'make clean;make' . > > -DGUEST_SESSSETUP=2 > > This allows people without a

HI I have been working with NT, Samba and win 9x for a couple of years. Any time an NT server is set to Domain security, or a Samba server is set to anything but share level security I have problems. My problem is this. I want to allow a diverse groupe of machines to connect to the samba server using user level access, but it always askes me for a password to connect to \\SERVER\IPC$, but no

Hi, I'm trying to set up a transfer area between my RH9 box and my WXP box. Preferably no password would be required on the WXP box, but I'll take anything after the ridiculous amount of time I've spent on this. If anyone can help I'd really appreciate it. At this point I'd be willing to offer my first born child as a reward. And I'll throw in my mother in law free. :)

I have Samba 2.0.5a running with multiple configuration files for different groups of users (one config file per group). In the common config file (which does an include to load the group file) I set valid users to a one specific group. In the group config files, I then set valid users to include the necessary group (and also do other stuff like restricting the interface the connections can come

I'm running the latest samba release (2.2.8a), and everything seems to be running fine. Except for something that does not look quite right. Connections to the IPC$ share are being left behind by samba once the user has logged off. And what's even more troubling is that the pid associated with the lingering IPC$ connection is picked up by the next smbd process, and then you have one pid

yesterday i saked for help because : - I set a valid guest account (suid to it permit me to use printer) - I defined a printer share publicly accessible - my server is in secutity = user and I need to stay it like that when trying to access to the server from an account not existing on the Unix part, Samba asks for a password for IPC$ what is wrong in my configuration? [global] ... printing

Back to this problem Here a proof of it: 1. smbd version 3.0.11 started yaberge2@sda6 ==> p smbd root 13820 20662 0 08:05:39 - 0:00 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -D -s/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf root 20662 1 0 08:05:39 - 0:00 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -D -s/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf yaberge2@sda6 ==> /usr/local/samba/bin/smbstatus Samba version 3.0.11

Does this look right? The places to look are wait and wait_for_multiple (which I modified to take the class as an argument, so that I could yield). Dan /**************************************************************************** * ipc.c - source for the win32-ipc package ****************************************************************************/ #include "ruby.h" #include