similar to: DRBD NFS load issues

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "DRBD NFS load issues"

2002 Jan 04
1
rsync -e ssh --bwlimit=20 ?
Hello Everyone: I've been trying to get rsync using --bwlimit using openssh for transport without success. Here's what I get: % rsync --bwlimit=20 from.com:/dir/file.txt /dest user@from.com's password: **** rsync: unrecognized option `--bwlimit=20' unexpected EOF in read_timeout I tried specifying ssh transport using both the -e option and by setting the RSYNC_RSH
2004 May 21
2
question about --bwlimit=
I am doing some benchmarking of rsync. I am using the --bwlimit= option to throttle down rsync to predict its operation over slow communications links. I am using rsync 2.6.2 from the release site without any patches. I downloaded the release rather than pull from the CVS tree. I have 2 servers "wilber" (the remote archive) and "judy" (the local archive) connected with a gig
2004 Nov 04
1
Problems with --bwlimit && --daemon
Hi list, I couldn't find anything related to this, on mailing lists or even bugzilla, so here it is. A problem with this combination exists in the new 2.6.3 where the bwlimit code got rewritten and is not present at <= 2.6.2. The problem is that on io.c:882 bwlimit_writemax is also used to control the bandwidth, but it is not initialized for the daemon mode. At options.c:772 you can see
2005 Jan 13
1
--bwlimit doesn't work for daemon mode
[I'm not subscribed, please CC me on replies] Some time after 2.6.0 the --bwlimit code was enhanced, but the code now doesn't work anymore when you set the bandwidth limit for the daemon and generates error log entries like: 2005/01/13 08:17:03 [29636] rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 12 \ bytes: phase "unknown" [receiver]: Success (0) 2005/01/13 08:17:03 [29636]
2003 Apr 15
1
Two --bwlimit issues
Hi, I have two issues with the --bwlimit parameter to rsync which are not mentioned in the FAQ (please correct me if I am wrong): 1. When both an rsync client and an rsync daemon specify the --bwlimit parameter, the client's value overrides the server's value. This could be used in a DOS attack if the client uses a larger value than the server intended. The documentation also is
2008 Mar 28
1
bwlimit on rsync locally
Does "bwlimit" option really work on rsync locally? We have one type of harddisk and want to slow down rsync I/O on disk because I don't want the disk head gets too hot. While I'm trying to use --bwlimit option, it looks the rsync speed was slowed down, but iostat is not improved at all. In both case the block written speed is increased by the same amount. How could I really
2004 Jun 29
1
SEGV using --delete and multiple sources
When attempting to sync multiple sources to a single area, /fs/lib# ls ./ ../ bin/ founder/ skill/ var/ I want to combine these four rsyncs /usr/local/bin/rsync --exclude '.snapshot' --stats -v --bwlimit=1024 --delete -atz 'host::lib/bin' . /usr/local/bin/rsync --exclude '.snapshot' --stats -v --bwlimit=1024 --delete -atz 'host::lib/var' .
2003 Oct 17
2
--bwlimit not working right
Hello! I cant get the bwlimit option working right. If i set this option over 400 kbyte per sec i still only get 400kbyte per sec, whether wich value i set. I try this option with a 100MB big file. I use a debian stable System with rsync version 2.5.6cvs protocol version 26. Can someone tell me how i can this get working? thx Rene dpkg -l "rsync*" ii rsync 2.5.5-0.1 fast remote
2007 Feb 16
3
--bwlimit -z limits filesystem speed, not network speed
My impression when running with --bwlimit in combination with compression -z is that the speed to the filesystem is limited to the value given in --bwlimit. This must be contrary to the intention with --bwlimit. David
2013 Feb 13
2
[Bug 9660] New: rsync --daemon --bwlimit does not work on server side
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9660 Summary: rsync --daemon --bwlimit does not work on server side Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: mopp at gmx.net
2007 Jul 30
3
kmod-drbd-smp (2.6.9-55.0.2.EL) has unknown symbols (kmod-drbd not).
Hi ! Not very blocking because the smp module loads perfectly. # yum --exclude=kmod-drbd*\plus\* install kmod-drbd Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Excluding Packages in global exclude list Finished Reducing CentOS-4 - Plus to included packages only Finished Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies -->
2004 May 26
1
bwlimit=
Wayne replied to my original note which said that in a special situation that I was using to probe rsync to build a behavioral model that bwlimit= resulted in bimodal behavior around a 4000 kbyte/sec value. He responded with a patch that I have tested in a limited way. I have a push scenario from a local site to a remote site. I use a file that is 6.3 Megabyte in size whose checksums (when
2003 Jun 18
1
Oops more testing was required....
Oops. Missed one line in the last patch.... Roger. -- ** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 ** *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* * The Worlds Ecosystem is a stable system. Stable systems may experience * * excursions from the stable situation. We are currently in such an * * excursion: The stable situation does
2011 Jul 25
1
kernel 3.0.0 mainline and drbd 8.4
hi xen user/dev list, i want to compile drbd 8.4 against kernel mainline 3.0 source and receive an error: my commands: # cd /usr/src/drbd-8.4.0 # ./autogen.sh # ./configure --localstatedir=/var --sysconfdir=/etc --with-km=yes # cd /usr/src/drbd-8.4.0/drbd # make clean # make KDIR=/usr/src/linux-3.0 the error message: *** In file included from include/linux/security.h:25,
2011 Jul 25
1
kernel 3.0.0 mainline and drbd 8.4
hi xen user/dev list, i want to compile drbd 8.4 against kernel mainline 3.0 source and receive an error: my commands: # cd /usr/src/drbd-8.4.0 # ./autogen.sh # ./configure --localstatedir=/var --sysconfdir=/etc --with-km=yes # cd /usr/src/drbd-8.4.0/drbd # make clean # make KDIR=/usr/src/linux-3.0 the error message: *** In file included from include/linux/security.h:25,
2011 Jun 30
1
Xen with DRBD, mount DRBD device / Filesystem type?
Hi everyone, I´m using Citrix XenServer with DRBD. But something went really wrong, so I need a fresh Install.My only question is, how can I mount the DRBD partition? It is /dev/drbd1 , but if I try to mount it, I need to provide the filesystem type. Does anyone know what I have to do? I only need to copy some data from it, it doesn’t matter if it will be destroyed. I tried GFS as filesystem
2009 Nov 23
5
[OT] DRBD
Hello all, has someone worked with DRBD (http://www.drbd.org) for HA of mail storage? if so, does it have stability issues? comments and experiences are thanked :) Thanks, Rodolfo.
2011 Jan 21
2
Issue with bwlimit after resuming a partial transfer due to a communication break
I am using rsync version 3.0.7. My rsync server is running on the cloud. I have set the bwlimit to 10 i.e. 10 KBps. When I try to sync files the bwlimit is as what is set. I have enabled storage of partial files. When a communication break causes rsync to time out during a transfer the partial file is stored in the partial directory. I then try rsync again when the link is up. At this point I see
2010 Jan 13
1
Problems loading drbd after upgrade
Hi, I've upgrade the kernel to the latest version (C5) and after the update the drbd is not being loaded at reboot time. My previous running kernel was 2.6.18-164.el5. I've checked the /lib/modules/ and /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.10.1.el5/weak-updates/drbd82/drbd.ko -> /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.el5/extra/drbd82/drbd.ko And /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.el5/extra/drbd82/drbd.ko exists 2004
2008 Mar 16
1
Should I update to DRBD 82?
Hello, This morning I noticed the following output from "yum update": Installing: drbd82 x86_64 8.2.5-1.el5.centos extras 209 k replacing drbd.x86_64 8.0.11-1.el5.centos As far as I'm aware DRBD works fine for me. Is there a way I can find out about the new release and weather I should upgrade? I can't figure out the CentOS issue tracking system