similar to: request_oplock_break - a clue - what does it mean ?

On Mon, 18 Jan 1999 samba@samba.org wrote: > Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 14:55:42 +0730 (SST) > From: Gregory Hosler <gregory.hosler@eno.ericsson.se> > To: samba@samba.org, samba-bugs@samba.org, btenison@dibbs.net > Subject: request_oplock_break - a clue - what does it mean ? > Message-ID: <XFMail.990117145542.gregory.hosler@eno.ericsson.se> > > Hi all, > > I

What is the intended implementation of "don't descend". a) treat all files that are in the "don't descend hierarchy as "no such file" (or equivelent) or b) disable opendir() on "don't descent directories", but allow (for example) stats on files that are in the "don't descend directories" I would have expected the 1st. Sambe

we are running Samba 2.0.6 on a solaris 7 (intel) box. Users (about 270 at one time) connect to the home directories located on the samba server by NT 4 workstations . Problem is ..Some times they lose access suddenly .In the log files the following message appears ?------- [2000/08/22 08:28:09, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(1202) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock

Users are trying to cennect to their home dirs ... the request_oplock_break is failing: [1999/10/21 10:50:39, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(521) gpnte109i (137.94.128.183) connect to service s22350 as user s22350 (uid=22350, gid=34) (pid 27704) [1999/10/21 10:50:54, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(1136) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 25867

Hey, i build my first Linux Server in Oktober 2001. Everything works fine. At the end of Februar 2002 i got a problem. Please see the logfile. [2002/02/25 09:02:15, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1563) domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for domain NENN [2002/02/25 09:02:47, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(997) request_oplock_break: no response

Hello, I've been running samba 2.0.7 for a couple years now on a DEC alpha with Tru64 4.0D. I't pertty much a default smb.conf as far as oplocks & that sort of stuff. Anyway, the other day some users started having troubles with saving ms-word files. The smbd processes have always been running as root. But now the users with the problem own their smbd process. And they get

Hi, I'm in the process of trying to convince my organization to move from an exchange server, to a samba solution, while retaining their original windows environments, including Outlook clients. I thought I had all my issues covered, and suddenly I'm facing a show stopper. it turns out that a lot of my users "documentation" has been stored on "public folders" on the

I saw a little discussion about this a few weeks ago but nothing concrete. We're running samba-1.9.18p8 under Solaris 2.6x86. I am periodically getting the following in the logfiles, usually _many_ at a time: 1998/11/03 14:42:00 request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 5411 on port 40884 for dev = 1980040, inode = 33c4d When I look up the PID (in this case

skeet@Bridgewater.EDU wrote: > > > Basically what it looks like to me is that an smbd process is spawning a > child which goes defunct for some reason I have yet to determine and the > smbd process hangs out there waiting for the child. Of course the child is > never going to answer being defunct, so the parent smbd process sticks > around and keeps its oplocks. > That

Gregory Hosler <greg@camelot.eno.ericsson.se> wrote: > Everything was running smoothly, and then I applied the solaris "y2k" patches. > Now, most accesses to samba will hang for a minute or 2, before completing. In > the event log I see messages like: > > The redirector has times out a request to <server name> > > This did not used to happen.

Okay, here is the set up. I have Outlook set up to keep mail on the server for 5 days. At some point I started downloading all my mail that was on the server over and over again, even though I already have the mail. The weird thing is that it did not download all the mail, just a few. For example it would download 6 messages, then 18, then 12, etc! After I tried it a few times I had 50 of the same

I have this textfield that appears as a drop down section whithin a form when a link is clicked - so it is it''s own partial. The idea is that a value can be entered within that field and then added to a list, but I need the cursor to re-focus on that text field so lots and lots of values can be inputed without having to reclick on that field everytime. When the form is submitted I clear

On my campus network, there's one wins server that can see every machine on every subnet. I want to provide access to all these computers to the W98 boxes in my workgroup. So here's what I did: I created my own workgroup, set myself to be the local browse master and domain master. So now everything works properly on my linux box (rh 6.0, samba 2.0.5a) and the W98 boxes in my workgroup

Hello all! I've readed somes docs and I found nothing about the following trouble : I can't connect to my sbmd server using the following : '\\MYRH72SMBDSERVERNAME\'. I always got a error message like : 'Share name could not be found, make sure you typed it correctly....' , but if I utilize \\10.x.x.x\ all is working fine (I don't want to access using the \\IP\

I am running samba 1.9.18p3 on Solaris 2.5.1 The clients are NT 4.0 sp3 Everything was running smoothly, and then I applied the solaris "y2k" patches. Now, most accesses to samba will hang for a minute or 2, before completing. In the event log I see messages like: The redirector has times out a request to <server name> This did not used to happen. This is very puzzling,

I'm building a RedHat fileserver using an HP LH3 fileserver. I can't get the sbmd running however. The trial machine we've been running for 4 months now has the same setup and works perfectly. nmbd runs ok, but when I look at log.smb, it says bind failed on port 139_0.0.0.0 address already in use. But in inetd.conf there's only smbd on port 139. This is a fresh

Hello I just read this article and would like some feedback from experienced Asterisk users: =============== "Failed open source VoIP deployment leads to hosted VoIP strategy" By Jessica Scarpati "When budgets are crimped, open source voice over IP (VoIP) solutions look attractive -- a little extra work for a lower cap-ex. But those savings came at a high price for one Texas

I needed to compile nbdkit on CentOS 7 which is missing these protocols in curl, so hence the conditional compilation. Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com> --- I have this patch so that I can compile it on CentOS 7 (fully updated), but I'm not sure what is the support policy and I didn't even check whether the libcurl there is old or whether the SMB support is

Ok I'm at a loss, I have 2 instances on winbindd / smbdd / nmbdd running (basically copied to install from samba-multiple-domains.blogspot .com but with my domains and ip's) But the issue I have is that even though both domains joined, and I can see all the winbinds and smbs running, and no errors in the logs, it appears that wbinfo / ntlm_auth only work with one of the units, no matter

I am currently using samba 2.3a-12.3 as a PDC, here is my smb.conf [global] netbios name = kidpaddle workgroup = JUDO domain master = yes local master = yes preferred master = yes os level = 255 wins support = yes time server = yes security = user encrypt passwords = yes domain logons = yes domain admin group = root davidj logon drive = H: logon