similar to: Long share name

Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches similar to: "Long share name"

2011 Aug 31
4
[LLVMdev] Getting rid of phi instructions?
On 30.8.2011, at 19.19, Eli Friedman wrote: > reg2mem won't do quite this transformation... not sure exactly what you need. I need to get rid of phis. This code is compiled from C++ and for some functions there are no phis, but multiple call instructions. I am targeting hardware in the end, and the next tool reading the IR does not like phis when it's generating VHDL. My questions may
2011 Aug 31
2
[LLVMdev] Getting rid of phi instructions?
On 31.8.2011, at 11.41, Eli Friedman wrote: > Mmm... reg2mem will transform IR with PHI's into IR without them, but > it generates a bunch of alloca's, which I would assume are not cheap > to lower to VHDL. You might have to write your own pass to get the > precise transformation you're looking for. Right. Thanks. I need to see the reg2mem source code. Teemu
2011 Aug 30
2
[LLVMdev] Getting rid of phi instructions?
Hi all, is there a pass to get rid of phi-instructions in a function? There's no loop involved. I have a function approx. like this: void @func() { entry: … bb1: … bb2: … %tmp100 = phi i32 [ 0, bb1 ], [ 1, bb2 ] … %tmp101 = getelementptr …, %tmp100 tail call void @anotherfunc(…, %tmp101) ret void } I would like it to rather be something like this: void @func() { entry: … bb1: ...
2011 Aug 31
0
[LLVMdev] Getting rid of phi instructions?
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Teemu Rinta-aho <teemu.rinta-aho at nomadiclab.com> wrote: > On 31.8.2011, at 11.41, Eli Friedman wrote: > >> Mmm... reg2mem will transform IR with PHI's into IR without them, but >> it generates a bunch of alloca's, which I would assume are not cheap >> to lower to VHDL.  You might have to write your own pass to get the
2011 Aug 31
0
[LLVMdev] Getting rid of phi instructions?
> the next tool reading the IR does not like phis when it's generating VHDL. If you're doing a conversion from LLVM IR to some other non-SSA IR (like the tool's), you can do the phi node removal yourself as you convert. Basically, every predecessor block referenced by a phi node will have an assignment to that variable before branching. There are techniques to make the resultant
2008 Aug 18
5
opening Doors with Asterisk!?
Hello all, i read a few articles online about the possibility to setup a "buzzer" door system to PBX using asterisk! currently my setup contains asterisk of course, and a sipura 3102.. what do i need to get such a feature done?! or should i ask if its possible?! _________________________________________________________________ Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger?
2010 Sep 23
1
[LLVMdev] Mapping C++ class names to LLVM type names?
Hi, We are writing a utility whose input includes the names of some C++ classes, and we want to locate the corresponding LLVM types in the current module. I'm trying to look through LLVM and clang sources but cannot figure out how the LLVM type names are constructed for the C++ class names. Any help appreciated (like the name of a library call to do it or even a pointer to code where this
2011 Aug 30
0
[LLVMdev] Getting rid of phi instructions?
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Teemu Rinta-aho <teemu.rinta-aho at nomadiclab.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > is there a pass to get rid of phi-instructions in a function? There's no loop involved. reg2mem. > I have a function approx. like this: > > void @func() { > entry: >        … > bb1: >        … > bb2: >        … >        %tmp100 = phi i32 [ 0,
2011 Aug 31
0
[LLVMdev] Getting rid of phi instructions?
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Teemu Rinta-aho <teemu.rinta-aho at nomadiclab.com> wrote: > On 30.8.2011, at 19.19, Eli Friedman wrote: > >> reg2mem won't do quite this transformation... not sure exactly what you need. > > I need to get rid of phis. This code is compiled from C++ and for some functions > there are no phis, but multiple call instructions. I am
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
it were a Microsoft box... (Windoze is so stupid it'll never know the difference!) -----Original Message----- From: samba-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Fred Jackson Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 10:39 PM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: a question? Hi does the command line smbpasswd -j <domain> -r <PDC> apply to clients joining a
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- www.valinux.com VA Linux Systems gcarter_at_valinux.com www.samba.org SAMBA Team jerry_at_samba.org www.plainjoe.org jerry_at_plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path:
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
apply to this (security=domain) case, since auth is via the PDC. So, shouldn't winbind_lookup_sid() be succeeding. Should I be trying to track the failure in that code? In case it's helpful, ldd /usr/sbin/smbd shows: libdl.so.2 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40017000) libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x4001a000) libpam.so.0 => /lib/libpam.so.0 (0x40030000) libc.so.6 =>
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
have a hosts allow or hosts deny line in your smb.conf. If you don't want samba to do reverse lookups, then comment out any allow/deny hosts lines in your smb.conf file. Don -----Original Message----- From: future@yxtc.edu.cn [mailto:future@yxtc.edu.cn] Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 3:00 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: dns and samba Hi, I find that my samba server always does
2011 Apr 20
2
[LLVMdev] Dragonegg Git mirror?
Is there an official Git mirror for Dragonegg? Cannot find the URL with Google nor with guesswork. Teemu
2011 Apr 28
2
[LLVMdev] Naming of types by DragonEgg vs. LLVM-GCC
Hi all, I used to use llvm-g++ to transform C++ source to LLVM IR. Now I am trying to switch to using DragonEgg, but I faced some problems because of the way DragonEgg is naming types in the resulting IR file. An example: LLVM-GCC: %"struct.Vector<ARPResponder::Entry>" = type { %"struct.ARPResponder::Entry"*, i32, i32 } %"struct.Vector<String>" = type {