Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Samba 2.0 Beta23 released !"
1998 Dec 15
0
Samba 2.0.0beta4 released.
The Samba Team are pleased to announce Samba 2.0 Beta4
This is the fourth of (hopefully) a short series of Beta
releases of the 2.0 code and incorporates bug fixes and
changes from feedback gained from the earlier betas.
Show-stopper bugs notwithstanding, this is expected to be
the last beta release before the official ship of the
stable Samba 2.0 release, so it is very important for
people to
1998 Dec 31
0
Samba 2.0.0 Beta5 released.
The Samba Team is pleased to announce Samba 2.0.0 Beta5
This is the fifth of (hopefully) a short series of Beta
releases of the 2.0.0 code and incorporates bug fixes and
changes from feedback gained from the earlier betas.
Show-stopper bugs notwithstanding, this is expected to be
the last beta release before the official ship of the
stable Samba 2.0.0 release, so it is very important for
people
1999 Jan 04
1
SAMBA digest 1926
samba@samba.org schrieb:
> SAMBA Digest 1926
>
> For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/
> Topics covered in this issue include:
>
> 1) Three problems with Windows NT
> by terminus@backinthe.ussr.net (Jeremy Malcolm)
> 2) Re: Encrypted passwords and OS2/Win95/Win98
> by Benjamin Scott
1998 Nov 24
0
Samba 2.0 Beta2 released !
The Samba Team are pleased to announce Samba 2.0 Beta2
This is the second of (hopefully) a short series of Beta
releases of the 2.0 code and incorporates bug fixes and
changes from feedback gained from the first beta.
We are relasing these Betas to enable the Samba Team to gain
wider testing of the new autoconf mechanism and fix any
bugs before the first ship of the new stable version of
Samba -
1999 Feb 06
0
Samba 2.0.1 released.
The Samba Team is pleased to announce Samba 2.0.1.
This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the
version that all production Samba servers should be running
for all current bug-fixes. Due to a couple of smbd crash
bugs that were found in Samba 2.0.0 it is recommened
all sites using Samba 2.0.0 upgrade to this release.
It may be fetched via ftp from :
ftp://<samba.org mirror
1999 May 18
0
Samba 2.0.4 released
The Samba Team is pleased to announce Samba 2.0.4.
This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the
version that all production Samba servers should be running
for all current bug-fixes.
Samba 2.0.4 now supports the viewing and modification of
UNIX security ownership and permissions from the standard
Windows NT client security dialog. More details may be found
in the NT_Security document
1999 Jul 21
2
Samba 2.0.5 released.
The Samba Team is pleased to announce Samba 2.0.5.
This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the
version that all production Samba servers should be running
for all current bug-fixes.
Please read the "IMPORTANT NOTE" section of the release
notes as this explains three security bugfixes which have
been added in this release. It is vital that Samba admins
understand these
1999 Nov 11
0
Samba 2.0.6 released.
The Samba Team is pleased to announce Samba 2.0.6.
This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the
version that all production Samba servers should be running
for all current bug-fixes.
It may be fetched via ftp from :
ftp://ftp.samba.org/pub/samba/samba-2.0.6.tar.gz
Or just follow the link on the main page of
your nearest http://samba.org mirror.
Binary packages for supported systems
2000 Apr 26
1
R:
penso che ti/ci possainteressare, soprattuto il fatto che la versione html
del libro sia disponibile con il prg GRATUITAMENTE
Marco Frattola (???) -
Cubecom S.p.A.
Via de Marini,1 3 piano Torre WTC
16149 GENOVA
tel. 010 6591184
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: samba@samba.org [mailto:samba@samba.org]
> Inviato: Nessuna
> Oggetto:
>
>
> id
2000 Apr 26
2
Samba 2.0.7 released
The Samba Team is pleased to announce Samba 2.0.7.
This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the
version that all production Samba servers should be running
for all current bug-fixes. This version has been tested
against Windows 2000 and has no *known* issues with that
release of Windows.
It may be fetched via ftp from :
ftp://ftp.samba.org/pub/samba/samba-2.0.7.tar.gz
Or just follow
2007 May 14
1
Hierarchical models in R
Is there a way to do hierarchical (bayesian) logistic regression in R, the
way we do it in BUGS? For example in BUGS we can have this model:
model
{for(i in 1:N) {
y[i] ~ dbin(p[i],n[i])
logit(p[i]) <- beta0+beta1*x1[i]+beta2*x2[i]+beta3*x3[i]
}
sd ~ dunif(0,10)
tau <- pow(sd, -2)
beta0 ~ dnorm(0,0.1)
beta1 ~ dnorm(0,tau)
beta2 ~ dnorm(0,tau)
beta3 ~
2004 Apr 21
2
Question on CAR appendix on NLS
The PDF file on the web, which is an appendix on nonlinear regression
associated with the CAR book, is very nice.
When I ran through the code presented there, I found something
odd. The code does a certain model in 3 ways: Vanilla NLS (using
numerical differentation), Analytical derivatives (where the user
supplies the derivatives) and analytical derivatives (using automatic
differentiation). The
2010 Mar 25
0
help with breaking loops used to fit covariates in nlme model building procedure
Dear All
I'm attempting to speed up my model building procedure, but need some help with the loops I've created...please bear with me through the explanation!
My basic model call is something like:
m0sulf.nlme<-nlme(conc~beta0*exp(-beta1*day)+beta2*exp(-beta3*day),
data=m0sulf,
fixed=(beta0+beta1+beta2+beta3~1),
2009 Nov 27
0
VAR forecasts and out-of-sample prediction
Dear users,
I am struggling with this issue. I want to estimate a VAR(1) for three
variables, say beta1 beta2 beta3, using monthly observations from January
1984 to September 2009. In-sample period January 1984 to December 2003,
out-of-sample January 2004 to September 2009. This is what I have done at
the moment
2018 Mar 28
0
coxme in R underestimates variance of random effect, when random effect is on observation level
Hello,
I have a question concerning fitting a cox model with a random intercept, also known as a frailty model. I am using both the coxme package, and the frailty statement in coxph. Often 'shared' frailty models are implemented in practice, to group people who are from a cluster to account for homogeneity in outcomes for people from the same cluster. I am more interested in the classic
2018 Apr 04
1
parfm unable to fit models when hazard rate is small
Hello, I would like to use the parfm package: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/parfm/parfm.pdfhttps://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/parfm/parfm.pdf in my work. This package fits parametric frailty models to survival data. To ensure I was using it properly, I started by running some small simulations to generate some survival data (without any random effects), and analyse the data using
2006 Mar 27
1
Missing Argument in optim()
Hello everybody,
i already searched the archieves, but i still don't know what is wrong
in my implementation, mybe anybody coud give me some advice
ll1<-function(rho,theta,beta1,beta2,beta3,beta4,t,Szenariosw5,Testfaellew5,X1,X2)
{
n<-length(t)
t<-cumsum(t)
tn<-t[length(t)]
Szenn<-Szenariosw5[length(Szenariosw5)]
2010 Mar 26
1
Problems if optimization
What's up fellows...
I am a begginer in R and i am trying to find the parameters of one
likelihood function, but when i otimize it, always appers a error or
advertisement and the solve does not occur.
The problem seems like that:
"lMix<-function(pars,y){
beta1<-pars[1]
beta2<-pars[2]
beta3<-pars[3]
beta4<-pars[4]
beta5<-pars[5]
alfa1<-pars[6]
2012 Oct 03
1
Errors when saving output from WinBUGS to R
Dear all
I used R2WinBUGS package's bugs() function to generate MCMC results. Then I
tried to save the simulation draws in R, using read.bugs() function. Here is
a simple test:
######################
library(coda)
library(R2WinBUGS)
#fake some data to test
beta0=1
beta1=1.5
beta2=-1
beta3=2
N=200
x1=rnorm(N, mean=0,sd=1)
x2=rnorm(N, mean=0,sd=1)
x3=rnorm(N, mean=0,sd=1)
lambda2= exp(beta0+
2003 Jan 21
1
re: website samba.org is missing most of the documentation?
Although I've installed samba-common, -server, -doc version 2.2.7a (from
the Mandrake 9 distribution), thr -doc RPM is broken since it actually
didn't install any of the files it claimed it would.
No problem, I thought, I'll just read it online.
Except for some reason, in his/her infinite wisdom, your webmaster has
apparently decided not to put most of your documentation on your