similar to: SMBedit...

As a followup to my own email... We did some testing here today with connecting to the share from an NT box, where we connect to \\relay\marc as marc when log'd in as a seperate user...NT refuses to allow it. Is there a bug with the server that, using smbclient from Linux, allows you to connect to any share without a password? Can someone test this and see if its a local problem or not?

Under Solaris 7/sparc, I get: Compiling smbd/connection.c smbd/connection.c:381: conflicting types for `utmp_yield' smbd/connection.c:30: previous declaration of `utmp_yield' 381 has 'int pid', while 30 has 'pid_t pid' ... I changed 381 to reflect 30 and she continues on its way ... Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems

Don't know how many ppl saw/read the following: http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/news/0,4153,1015266,00.html One of the comments on Slashdot was the question as to how well 4.4lite would have done in the same tests, as they "theorize" that alot of the problems revolve around Linux's IP stack... Now if only we had a working MMAP, we'd be all set... Marc G. Fournier

Morning... Just spent this evening getting printing setup off my FreeBSD machine (oh, how I love Solaris at these times *groan*)...got it now so that I can print directly from Netscape, color and graphics and all. The printer is an HP 560c. Now, I want to be able to print from my Windoze95 machine, and have samba setup for that, as well as file sharing. If I setup my Windoze machine such

Morning... First off, is there a non-digest version of this list available? Second, and more important, from reading the docs, the following 'share' should not prompt me for a password...no? # This one is useful for people to share files [tmp] comment = Temporary file space path = /tmp read only = no public = yes If this is correct, then there is a problem here, since I

Morning... Attached are two files. The first (smb.session) shows one user connecting to two different shares on a remote server using *no* password... The second is the smb.conf file found on that remote server, running Solaris 2.6, and Samba 2.0.3 ... I'm *really* hoping that its something that we're overlooking as far as configuration is concerned...or else there is one helluva

Is the following a known problem: =============================================================== [2000/01/26 09:41:03, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 22273 (2.0.6) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2000/01/26 09:41:03, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) =============================================================== This is using the same

Does anyone have any experience with a high number of *simultaneous* connections? We're investigating the possibility of moving one of our servers from novell to solaris, and the only "concern" we have at this time is what happens if 800 clients all decide to connect at the same time? the server will be running solaris/7 on a dual-ppro system ... I konw with the 'idle'

Here's an odd question/request ... Right now, if you setup smb.conf with a [homes] section, anyone can connect and login to the server, as themselves, and mount their home directory. No probs there. Has anyone thought of, and possibly implemented, a means where that end user could change things for themselves to extend permissions on their directory? Basically, make a Win based utility

morning all ... I want to share a drive between two of my computers ... dont' want to deal with smbpasswd, so am just doing it as an open share with a host allow set to the computer that i want to share with ... smb.conf is setup nice and simple: [global] workgroup = MYGROUP server string = Samba Server hosts allow = 10.27.227.73 log file = /var/log/log.%m debug level = 3

G'day ... Altho it is rare, we are getting union_lookup panics on our server(s) ... as most on this list already know, we make heavy use of unionfs to share between jails, and I already know that this is the "kernel side" cause of the problem ... but ... From what I can tell, though, the "trigger" for the panic is pkg_delete ... if I build a jail'd environment,

I can't answer any of this, but the following was taken from a thread on the "Novell Technology Transfer Partners List <NOVTTP@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>" and passed over to me by my boss... Any comments/refutations/etc most definitely accepted... Please note that *I'm* the Senior Unix Systems Administrator at the University I work at, and have been moving us towards Samba since I

Hi... I'm trying to "sell" the idea of Samba (instead of NT servers) at work, to replace Novell servers...but am having problems figuring out how to do something... If I go into NT, Windows Explorer and do a properties on a file, there is a section that allows you to set, essentially, ACLs on a file...allow various individual users or groups of users to access the file without

Just went to look at that page, and all the dates are pre-'98 as far as "last updates" are concerned... Does anyone have a URL or anything that has testimonials of some sort? Trying to provide my boss with ammunication against another 'manager' who just sent around comments from a Novell mailing list about Samba... I'm curious about stuff like server/platform being run

Due to an issue I'm having with 7.x, and trying to track it down, I spent tonight getting my server setup to allow my to break into the debugger when it hangs, and hopefully dump core ... But, although I *think* I've got it all, I'm obviously missing something, as it isn't breaking ... First ... I'm running a proliant server, and when I connect via SSH to ILO on that

Best Regards, Mike Garver _________________________ Marketing Associate Deerfield.com http://www.deerfield.com/ sales@deerfield.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Please download and try our other exciting software products: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- WinGate - http://www.wingate.com/ FTP Voyager -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm trying to run a QEMU VM on top of a FreeBSD 7.x server ... I've tried the exact same setup on my desktop, using 192.168.1.x and an fxp device, and it all works perfectly, but as soon as I do this on another machine on a public IP, I'm not getting any routing, I can't even ping it from the same machine ... My first thought was

I just made one of my 4.x remote servers inaccessible and just tested it on my 5.x laptop, and it does the same thing ... not sure if this is considered a 'desirable' effect, or a but ... but ... 'ifconfig <device> -alias' will wipe out all IPs on the device: mobile# ifconfig -a lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask

But, following the instructions, I get: eris:/usr/slocal/samba/bin> ./smbpasswd -j ACADIA -r pdc.acadiau.ca attempt_netbios_session_request: PDC.ACADIAU.CA rejected the session for name *SMBSERVER. Segmentation fault GDB shows: eris:/usr/slocal/samba/bin> gdb !$ core gdb smbpasswd core GNU gdb 4.17 Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU

'K, not sure how/what to debug here ... doing a grep of svr1.postgresql.org in /proc/*/status shows all the processes 'stuck' in inode ... /proc/38750/status:inetd 38750 2072 2072 2072 -1,-1 noflags 1055120147,191009 0,0 0,592 inode 0 0 0,0,0,2,3,4,5,20,31 svr1.postgresql.org /proc/38752/status:inetd 38752 2072 2072 2072 -1,-1 noflags 1055120154,886433 0,0 0,637 inode 0 0