similar to: Help On Multiple Netgroups Across Multiple Subnets

Hi How do I get the following browse-setup to work? --------- | A | |Linux | --------- WG1 192.168.10.0 | | WG2 192.168.10.0 ---------------------- ----------------- | | | -------- -------- -------- | B | | C | | D | |Win98 | |WinNT | |Win98 |

I'm trying to determine if the global configuration options for remote announce and remote browse sync work for browsing a different workgroup in a different subnet. In the books I have, it just talks about using these options to span the same workgroup across two subnets. In our situation, for example, I have two different workgroups (WG1 - 10.50.50.1 and WG2 - 10.100.50.1). Each of these

I have just started playing around with Samba and have run into a mental block / learning hurdle Here is what I have I have a WinNT box that acts as a PDC for a domain (mydomain for the sake of this post). Within 'mydomain' I have several workgroups (wg1, wg2, wg3, etc) Now here is where I get confused. I am trying to set up the Samba Server so it will work as follows [general] this

Hi list, I read the samba doc but i didn't find any answer to my problem, maybe you can help me or just point me where to find the solution. That would be very appreciated. Our company has three offices in different cities plus a head office. All of those office are linked using VPNs. For now, we have a domain at the head office using samba3 as a PDC, a master LDAP server for

On 2020-09-03 20:59, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 03/09/2020 19:09, freebsd--- via samba wrote: >> I having the same issue like: >> >> https://forge.univention.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47314 >> >> I have 2 samba servers running with nearly identical configs: >> >> ii? samba???????????????????????????????? 2:3.6.6-6+deb7u15 >> ii?

On Fri, 25 Nov 2016, Jonah Naylor wrote: > I'm still getting "Connection refused on the client cgi screen as well > as in the shell it gives me UPS upsname at ipaddresshere is unavailable... You reported that access works correctly from elsewhere on the master subnetwork. Does access from the master subnetwork produce the "accepts" e-mail message generated by the

Hello, I have attached a small patch that enables OpenSSH 4.7p1 to use netgroups for users and hosts entries in the AllowUsers and DenyUsers configuration options in sshd_config. This has the following advantages: * hostnames or ip addresses don't have to be maintained in sshd_config, but you can use meaningful names for groups of users and groups of hosts. * large scale installations can

Hello, Has anyone got netgroups working with Samba 3.0.14a where the netgroups are stored in the LDAP directory? I'm using Solaris 9 and SUN's directory server v5.2. What I'm seeing is that samba goes through the motions of looking up a host in a netgroup, but no query is seen by the LDAP server or on the network and the host is never found in the netgroup. Any help would be

Hi, I have some problems using netgroups with samba, at the moment I'm using the debian-package with Version samba-2.2.3a-6 on a debian testing system. The problem is that samba checks for wrong host-name in the nis-database here is my snippet of the smb.conf to have a exchange partition: --------smb.conf [export] path = /Mirror/export writeable = Yes guest only = Yes

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1018 Summary: Incorrect parsing of hosts.equiv for netgroups Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All URL: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix- dev&m=110909300030444&w=2 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

Hi, me again Still trying to run diablo using wine. This time i included: The output when i run : wine setup.exe The listing of my wine-c (c:\) directory. The listing of my config file in the \.wine directory in the users directory Don't give me the answer, u don't have to breast feed me! But tell me if i can fix it without having any programming skills or knowledges of how wine works

G'day, I figured some others might benefit from this patch. It allows you to use the samba style @netgroup names in hosts allow and hosts deny. I've tested it on solaris and linux with no apparent problems.. I'll get rid of the static string in a couple of days when I have to worry about trying to get this into prod .. but with any luck someone else may have done that for me.. :)

Hi, I have the following newbie question, it is possible have two (or more) domains in the same IP subnetwork (e.g. 192.168.10.0/24)? I understand that is not possible have two PDC for the same domain in the same subnetwork, but I'm not sure what happens if we have two domains. Thanks for your help. Regards, -- Mauricio Strello C.

Hello, I'm in the process of migrating from Samba 2.2.8a to 3.0.14a and also changing from NIS to LDAP. I've installed and populated SUN's Directory Server v5.2 and added the required schema extensions and imported some accounts for testing with Samba. Previously I used a NIS netgroup in the hosts allow clause, of the form @hosts_smb and this worked when the samba server system was

Hi I'm using either V3.2 or V4.2p1 depending on the system. Server - OSF/1 V5.1 latest patch kit. If the system has all the accounts in the password file - ssh lets the users login. If the system has "+" at the end of the passwd file, users in the local password file or in NIS can login if I change the /etc/svc.conf to have "passwd=local" and add + at users:x:::::

Open-SSH'ers, I just noticed that ssh doesn't parse hosts.equiv the same as rsh. I set up an usertest user on targethost, and then su'ed to usertest on sourcehost. I put this in targethost's /etc/hosts.equiv + -usertest + at trusted-hosts (all hosts are rolled up into this netgroup) this should disallow usertest from rsh'ing into targethost from all hosts, but

Hi, I''d like to maintain netgroup entries in the /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow files to allow all unix admins loging access and default setup nologin for every non-authorized user. +@unixoperators:x::::: +:x:::::/opt/script/nologin I saw a thread about this online, but not a definitive resolution - not sure if the user resource type is the right way to implement this currently or to try to

Hi * I have a question about windows network browsing from linux box in a multi-subneted network. I have such network topology: my subnet is 10.105.27.224/27, there are 10 boxes in my subnet; also there are several other subnets - 10.105.27.0/27, 10.105.27.96/27, ..., 172.17.51.64/27, ..., 172.17.48.0/26, ... In our network we have one wins server with ip 172.17.48.13 that very likely configured

Hi, In my puppet configuration, to deploy certain files to group of nodes, everytime either a new class of node is being used or the node class has to typically extended to many other machines and is likely more typing. The more typing can generally result in anomalies/errors in hosts. For example: node x1.y.z x2.y.z x3.y.z x4.y.z{ ... ... } What I am trying to formulate this into is use

Beta 1 is now available at: http://www.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta ftp://ftp.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta Features include: 1) An OLD_PING_HANDLING option has been added to shorewall.conf. When set to Yes, Shorewall ping handling is as it has always been (see http://www.shorewall.net/ping.html). When OLD_PING_HANDLING=No, icmp echo (ping) is handled via rules and