similar to: Win95 to Linux/Samba Timings

I wonder is someone can offer an explaination and solution to the following :- using two PC's one running SCO Unix with Samba and one using Win95 we get the following timings when copying files from the Samba machine 4Mb file 2 min 53 sec using Samba via router 46 sec using FTP via router 31 sec using Samba direct 35 sec using FTP direct 26Mb file 10 min 4 sec Samba via router 4

I have recently upgraded to Redhat 5.2 and Samba 2.0.3 and now our backup is only going so far (uses smbclient to tar to tape) and reporting no more room on device, I estimate it is hitting the problem at around 5-6Gb - as its a 25Gb tape and has worked fine on older versions of redhat/samba I think the tape is ok. Has any one any ideas or suggestions on what to try ? Many Thanks Ian

We have a perculiar problem and wonder if anyone can shed some light or advice ? We have a variety of machines running SCO Unix 3 .2v4.2 with samba 1.9.16, we also have an NT 4.0 server, these are all sharing up various sections of their drives. There is a Red Hat Linux running using smbmount to mount all these drives onto a directory tree, the root of this tree is shared up using samba so raher

Hi, I sent an e-mail earlier about our strange Windows 95 browsing problem. Then, I upgraded to samba-2.0.2 from 1.9.17p4, but the problem is still there. I do need urgent help because almost all of our network connection does not work and our users do it for their research. Please help! Please, please! Let me repeat this strange problem: We have four UNIX machines, a Linux (Slackware 3.3,

Hi, I posted a few messages a couple of days ago about a strange windows 95 browsing problem with samba-2.0.2, 1.9.17p4 that none of our Windows 95 users can see our Linux shares, but all NT users can see the Linux shares, and all 95 and NT users can see AIX shares. All of our Linux and AIX use the save version of samba (I tested 2.0.2 and 1.9.17p4). Yesterday, I tried to down grade the version

Background: OS: Linux Mandrake 10.1 release: R 2.0.0 editor: GNU Emacs 21.3.2 front-end: ESS 5.2.3 --------------------------------- Colleagues I am having some trouble extracting results from the function by, used to average variables in a data.frame first by one factor (depth) and then by a second factor (station). The real data.frame is quite large > dim(data.2001) [1] 32049 11 Here is a

Howdy: I'm new to this samba stuff, but I've run across a problem that doesn't seem to be documented anywhere. It seems that OSR/2 clients (with all the M$ system updates; I already added the EnableClearTextPassword key) that have had their TCP/IP settings tweaked in the registry (eg, MaxMTU=576, TTL=32, RWIN added, etc) for DUN connections have mucho problems with a samba

Could anyone tell me what I may be doing wrong here? I'm using samba-1.9.18p8 on a Linux 2.0.32 box, RedHat 5.0 install. I can descend into this share from a WinNT box just fine, but get the following error messages from a Win95 box. Thank you all in advance, -Jon Charette --------- Start log at debug level 4 ---------------------- 1998/07/08 13:20:22 Transaction 52 of length 47 switch

Hello everybody, althought there are a lot of discussions on Samba's performance, I would like to share my results trying to connect Samba running on a Linux box to a Win95 workstation on a fast ethernet network. If any of you could have some ideas or suggestions , please mail me (cc: teo@flex.ro) because I am not (yet) on this mail list. First of all, may I present you : 1. THE SERVER -

Although I've installed samba-common, -server, -doc version 2.2.7a (from the Mandrake 9 distribution), thr -doc RPM is broken since it actually didn't install any of the files it claimed it would. No problem, I thought, I'll just read it online. Except for some reason, in his/her infinite wisdom, your webmaster has apparently decided not to put most of your documentation on your

Hi all, some times ago, I have installed samba at solaris 2.5 (at this time 1.9.17p4). In my net I have not NT-Server or Clients, there are only Win95-PCs and Unix-Maschines. For mount shares and printers with Win-95-Exploer samba works ok. Now I want setup the netlogon. I have make all, what is say in the domain.txt. Here is the smb.conf: [global] security = user guest account =

Hello, I have a 120 PC netwaork at work and I'm using samba 1.9.17p4 on a linux 2.0.32. Previously, I was using Netware 4.10 and I plan to replace it step by step by Linux/Samba (I have Unix and W95 clients). All samba shares either on a local or on a remote machine are working perfectly fine. But I also have some share on some directories exported by the netware server (in NFS mode,of

I'm having a very hard time making R CMD check produce a clean check on examples because of the timings inserted into examples by R CMD check. I am getting a difference on every example output caused by timing information being inserted by 'R CMD check'. The current 'Writing R Extensions' manual[1] states on p. 14: If directory tests has a subdirectory Examples

On 2/8/07, Albrecht, Dr. Stefan (AZ Private Equity Partner) <stefan.albrecht at apep.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > Thanks a lot for your comments. > > I very well agree with you that writing efficient code is about optimisation. The most important rules I know would be: > - vectorization > - pre-definition of vectors, etc. > - use matrix instead of data.frame > - do

I'm trying to maximize throughput between my Samba server and my Win2k (SP3 and 4) clients. Samba's configured to allow up to 64k packets and the server is on a GigE network (3com card, acenic driver) with SCSI UW2 drives (software RAID1 and RAID5 volumes). All clients are 100MB/sec FDX on a switched LAN. I can get sustained 35MB/sec transfers (read and write) on the disk subsystem

Hi, I am trying to integrate Asterisk with a very old PABX I have here for test purposes. I have it linked with and FXO module. Now the test scenario I am building goes like this: Incoming call on Legacy PABX --> Call Transferred to Asterisk --> Announcement Played --> Call Transferred to SIP Xtn --> If call is unanswered perform a hook flash on active zap channel and return it to

Well, if you want Rowland to hear us.. You should have send this one to the list. ;-) On the "which first" here there are different opinions. My opinion is, if you systems is running correctly, it does not matter if you start with the DC with FSMO or not. But Note, this is my opinion and base on my experience. I've always done the server with FSMO first, why? .. Ough..

Hai, Great to see my info is helping people. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Andre Kirchhoff via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 1 oktober 2019 21:49 > Aan: Marco Gaiarin > CC: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Upgrade DC 4.5 -> 4.8, timings? > > Ciao, Marco. > > When upgrading

Hi Martin, When I attended the LinuxWorld Expo in NYC back in January, I chatted with some folks at the AMD booth, as well as guys from Penguin Computing (where we bought our Opteron box). I was told that the Operton has this somewhat strange setup that the memory is controlled by one CPU. The net effect of this being that when both CPUs are running, one might only be running at around 90%

This SO post: https://stackoverflow.com/q/76583828 describes a strange R CMD check error. Depending on the contents of a comment in one of the examples sections of a help page, an error like this could be triggered: > base::assign(".dptime", (proc.time() - get(".ptime", pos = "CheckExEnv")), pos = "CheckExEnv") >