similar to: Performance tips for heavily loaded servers

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3184 Bug ID: 3184 Summary: Unable to add deprecated KexAlgorithms back for host via config file Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.2p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: ssh

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 Bug ID: 11378 Summary: Please add a '--line-buffered' option to rsync to make logging/output more friendly with pipes/syslog/CI systems/etc. Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW

Hi, I updated from 0.9.17 to 0.9.18 using Suse 9.1 rpm. Now, all wine applications crash. Even winecfg crashes. Does nayone else have this problem? Osho

Dear I try to add three different lines (solid, short dash, long dash) in to current barplot. I saw there are types of lines ("p","b", ect). However, they are not what I request. Has nayone have this experience? Many Thanks! Xin [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

<..trying again after changing outgoing e-mail options to avoid bad headers...> I'm trying to use syslinux 3.08-pre11 on a Gateway E4000 with the (sample) config file below, and the ramdisk images fail to boot if selected as a menu option, but do boot if I press ESC and type the command line manually. The two options are for the same floppy image, but the first is compressed, the

I have NEVER been able to get nmbd to work in anything even remotely approximating a usable fashion. All I want it to do is DNS lookups. I can't even get it to do that reliably. It looks in some cases like it isn't even sending a response back to the querying clients. When I do a request that fails, I get this: --- nmb packet from 192.55.114.4(3175) header: id=8172 opcode=Query(0)

Hello, I am trying to compile R-2.2.0 on Slackware 10.2. I did ./configure --prefix=/usr --build=i486-slackware-linux. It went off without any problem and gave this configure status: R is now configured for i486-slackware-linux-gnu Source directory: . Installation directory: /usr C compiler: gcc -g -O2 C++ compiler: g++ -g -O2 Fortran

On Thu, 30 Oct 1997, Nathan Neulinger wrote: > > you'll need to do encrypted passwords for your users. what version of > > unix are you using? have you looked into PAMs? (plug-in authentication > > modules) > > The problem is, we'll never have cleartext passwords for the user. > Maintaining a separate password database is unnaceptable. If we wanted to

I have an e4000 and I want to shar just one directory that I use for storage purposes. I have set up the share and smb.vonf using swat. I have set it to guest only and when i try to cvonnect frmo my win98 laptop it asks for a password!?!? What am I doing wrong here, can someone point me in the right direction ? Thanks, Brandon

I get the following errors on the console of my newly installed 2.0.4b server on a Sun E4000: nmbd/nmbd_packets.c: (1412) find_subnet_for_nmb_packet: response record not found for response id <num>. nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c: (240) find_response_record: response packet id <num> received with no matching record I don't know the internals well enough to decipher these, can

Hi all. I'm trying to get printing going with CodeWeavers Wine and have come to the part where running "regapi" is required. Unfortunately this is not included with the CodeWeavers release. Can anyone suggest a way forward? Many thanks, Pete. --------------------------------------------------------------- | Pete Philips \|/ | |

Has anybody tried to to compile SAMBA using gcc under SCO unix 5? This may just be a problem I'm having using the gcc compiler, but I'm having problems. I would just like to know if anyone's done it, and any special problems they may have had. ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

On Fri 2023-01-20 16:12:20, Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean) wrote: > We've fairly regularaly seen liveptches which cannot transition within kpatch's > timeout period due to busy vhost worker kthreads. I have missed this detail. Miroslav told me that we have solved something similar some time ago, see https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220507174628.2086373-1-song at kernel.org/ Honestly,

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 04:12:20PM -0600, Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean) wrote: > We've fairly regularaly seen liveptches which cannot transition within kpatch's > timeout period due to busy vhost worker kthreads. In looking for a solution the > only answer I found was to call klp_update_patch_state() from a safe location. > I tried adding this call to vhost_worker(), and it

On Thu 2023-01-26 15:12:35, Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean) wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 06:03:16PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > > On Fri 2023-01-20 16:12:20, Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean) wrote: > > > We've fairly regularaly seen liveptches which cannot transition within kpatch's > > > timeout period due to busy vhost worker kthreads. > > > > I have

Users are trying to cennect to their home dirs ... the request_oplock_break is failing: [1999/10/21 10:50:39, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(521) gpnte109i (137.94.128.183) connect to service s22350 as user s22350 (uid=22350, gid=34) (pid 27704) [1999/10/21 10:50:54, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(1136) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 25867

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 08:43:55PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 03:12:35PM -0600, Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean) wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 06:03:16PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > > > On Fri 2023-01-20 16:12:20, Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean) wrote: > > > > We've fairly regularaly seen liveptches which cannot transition within

I want to thank whoever mentioned KerbNet by Cygnus Solutions! Wowza! I recommend that people check it out. It lets you implement Kerberos under UNIX and NT, and have them work together (so you have one *unified* security system that is used by both your NT and UNIX boxes). It's at http://www.cygnus.com/product/kerbnet-index.html It also does authentication *without* sending passwords over

I have tried all I can think of to resolve a samba performance problem. Below is a description of the problem. The Red Hat server is actually a higher performance machine than the NT machine, though they are close in capabilities: > When I first installed 5.0 I notices slow samba performance. By slow I > mean around 80K/second doing a normal copy to the server from a Windows > 95

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 Nathan Neulinger <nneul at neulinger.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- --- Comment #2 from Nathan Neulinger <nneul