similar to: Performance (and other) problems

Ok, I'm a dumb-ass today. I failed to see the "available = no" in the service entry. Sorry for wasting your time. Rob Naccarato "Civilized men are more discourteous than savages Sys Admin because they know they can be impolite without Sheridan College having their skulls split, as a general thing." Oakville, Ont. Canada

>Date: Tue, 8 Dec 1998 11:00:42 -0500 (EST) >From: Rob Naccarato <rob@sheridanc.on.ca> >To: samba@samba.org >Subject: Can't connect to shares w/2.0beta3 on OSF1 > > >I was running 1.9.18p10 on a test DEC Unix 4.0d box here and I decided to >give 2.0beta3 a try. For some reason, I cannot connect to any of the >server's >shares or even get a list of

I've been seeing these in my logs files ever since I upgraded to 1.9.18p10 and turned on oplock support for users' home directories: --snip -- 1998/10/07 10:05:44 oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds. 1998/10/07 10:05:44 oplock_break failed for file Start Menu/Open Office Document.lnk (fnum = 14, dev = 808446, inode = 45cb8). 1998/10/07 10:05:44 oplock_break: client

I've found these errors in my log.smbd file: Invalid snum 17 for admin 1998/12/03 10:35:48 xxxxxx (xx.xx.xx.xx) couldn't find service admin This occurs when attempting to connect to a share from a Win95 system. This is the share definition from smb.conf: [admin] available = no browsable = no path=/usr/SHERNET.32/groups/admin read only = yes write

I have a server here with 4 network interfaces (DEC Unix). All the Win95 clients are on the same 4 subnets as these 4 interfaces. One thing I noticed the other day is that the majority of the clients do not connect to the server's interface on the same subnet as the client. This is making unecessary use of our router. I'm wondering how I can force the clients to connect to the local

We've noticed this behaviour when Win95 crashes and the next person tries to logon (we are using roving profiles, samba 1.9.18p10): - user logs in to win95 - user crashes client - boot client - user tries to logon, but it takes *forever* and eventually returns a "the domain password you suppiled is not correct, or access to your logon server has been denied" error - user tries

I'm still having some problems with 1.9.18p10 on a DEC Unix 4.0e machine (this machine was upgraded from 4.0d last week). The smbds can take up to 20% of the cpu at various times. Anyways, I've been through all this before with the mailing list and a number of people who have attempted to help me out. Thanks to all of you. But, I have some more info which may or may not be useful.

I was running 1.9.18p10 on a test DEC Unix 4.0d box here and I decided to give 2.0beta3 a try. For some reason, I cannot connect to any of the server's shares or even get a list of it's services (via Start->Run->\\server) from Win95 clients. It asks for a password and no matter what I put in there I get "The password is not correct. Try again." I configured Beta3 a la:

Hello all I am in the process of trying to create a more fault tolerent HW setup for my asterisk platform, its all going well and I intend to do a wiki about it once its seen to be working. One thing gets me, and hopefully someone here can confirm my suspision - why is zaptel.conf not with the other asterisk files (I assume it is because its responsable for bringing up the hardware, not

Hi all, I've installed samba on a sun sparc-station with solaris 2.5. But when i'm doing something that's using the network really intense (like mp3-files playing over the network) the feed is not constant. With mp3 files you can that because you have pauses during the playing of the song. Is this a configuration mistake or something ? cu, Patrick

Peter> My problem is browsing printers that names are more than Peter> 8 chars long. Any printer that is longer than 8 chars (in the Peter> printcap file) does not show up when browsing. Peter> Anybody else affected by this? Is there a fix? Jim> I had considered "fixing" the code but then I wondered whether I would run Jim> into DOS's 8.3 filenaming convention

We have a requirement here to set up what we call a "shared area". This is nothing more than a directory on a Unix server (Digital Unix) that allows a group of users read and write access to the directory. The shared area needs to be accessible from Win95 clients. A big restriction that we want is: - when a user opens a file, others should not be able to write to that file. So, the

Just wondering when the next release of Samba is coming out with support formultiple WINS servers. If there are patches available to 1.9.18p8 that enable this support now, I'll take it. Rob Naccarato "In a perfect world, everyone would use Sys Admin Linux and drive a Saturn" Sheridan College Oakville, Ont. Canada

Hello all, We seems to have a bit of a problem with Windows 95 machines logging on to our network. I hope someone can shed some light on this. Current configuration: 2 servers. Once handles authentication and application serving while the other provides home directory services only. We have about 150 Windows 95 clients. The two servers are DEC Alpha 2100A and DEC Alpha 2000. Both are

My Win95 clients are having intermittent problems running the logon script. I am running Samba 1.9.17alpha5 on DEC Unix 3.2G. In the client's log file (under logs/), I receive this message: Share violation on file (1,1,0,9375,kix/logon.bat) = 0 Now, I've tried the various options reaging locking, but the problems still persist. Relevant options from smb.conf: [global] logon

We have been looking for a way to notify our users when they are running low on disk quota, without sending them mail. WinPopup actually seemed like the best way, so my partner began looking at feeding quota output into smbclient -M when quota was getting tight. The only problem is that smbclient -M frequently fails to find the client's host name. The -I parameter will often fix it, but I am

Hi, I use previous 4.4 version on my two Compaq AlphaServer systems. Is there a chance that CentOS 5 will also become available for Alpha? Thanks, Rob. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

We're using Samba 1.9.18p10 on a Linux 2.0.35 box as a fileserver chiefly for software development under VC++. Builds are done from the command line, not the IDE. I'm seeing rather slow build performance under NT4SP3. Build performance is fine under Win95. Build performance is also good when building from Samba 1.9.18p8 running on a Sun UltraSparc. To give some concrete figures, building

Is this an acceptable machine or does it have to be "rackmount" ? http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=250111166910 - rh -- Abba Communications Spokane, WA www.abbacomm.net

Hello. I'm hoping that you will provide some help with a Samba problem that I'm experiencing. We have an Alphaserver that has been functioning as the Samba-server in a Windows/NT Domain for about 5 years now. It was set up by an engineer here at Raytheon Missile Systems Company and he left the company about 2 years ago. I've inherited the administration of it. Last week