similar to: Installing shared Windoze executables on a Samba share (fwd)

On Sun, 4 Aug 2019, John Pierce wrote: > your DNS settings are in /etc/resolv.conf, just like every other unix > system since forever. Much to my surprise, I found this: # Generated by NetworkManager search midcoip.net nameserver 192.168.0.1 nameserver 2001:48f8:3004:2ce:5a19:f8ff:fe9e:a4bc I doubt it's the source of my problems, but the second line looks like something midco did to

On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 16:33 -0600, Michael Hennebry wrote: > For whatever reason, > the problem I was trying to solve seems to have gone away. > I can type in firefox's search box without midco stealing searches. > Something changed resolv.conf behind my back. > search midcoip.net > is there again. > I hadn't rebooted or changed firefox's preferences. > I'm

On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 06:51:44PM -0600, Michael Hennebry wrote: > I've chacked on that. > I've made what seemed like promissing changes to > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-post and > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/network-functions . > No go. > I still get the search line in resolv.conf . > I've tried putting in search google.com , > but on reboot, it

We recently tried the upgrade to 2.0 Beta series (just finished testing Beta 4) on our network. Everything works fine with 1.9.18pl10, but once we start 2.0 in its place we start getting the following in the log files: [1998/12/17 05:00:12, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(219) file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 246 are available. [1998/12/17 05:07:52, 1]

Hello, I am running Samba 2.2.2 with acl-0.7.16 on RedHat 6.2 (2.2.19). The PDC is a Windows 2000 Server and the Samba server is a domain member using Winbind. All the workstations are Windoze 2000 Pro with SP2. Everything seemingly works fine but every day or two I get a runaway SMBD process which hogs the CPU and becomes unkillable. The only resolution is to reboot the server completely.

On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 02:03:10PM -0600, Michael Hennebry wrote: > I'm using the default I got when I installed centos 7. > Was not aware of any alternatives. > > > ... Run 'nmcli con' to get a list of your network > > [root at localhost ~]# nmcli con > NAME UUID TYPE DEVICE > Wired connection 1

On Sun, 4 Aug 2019, John Pierce wrote: > So you need to modify the source file that NetworkManager is using. > somewhere in /etc/network or /etc/networking-scripts, a config file has > DNS0=192.168.0.1 or sokmething, or your system is getting that from DHCP Will check on that. > the web login on 192.168.0.1 is undoubtably your modem/router. -- Michael hennebry at

Hello, I am bussy building a xen cluster. When selecting mainboards for this cluster i came only up with core 2 duo mainboards with onboard gigabit ethernet cards with the realtek RTL8111B chipset. I have tested a mainboard and could not find a way to compile the driver sourcecode from the realtek site because of a missing /lib/modules/2.6.16-xen/Build directory. Can anyone help me out? I am

Hey, i build my first Linux Server in Oktober 2001. Everything works fine. At the end of Februar 2002 i got a problem. Please see the logfile. [2002/02/25 09:02:15, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1563) domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for domain NENN [2002/02/25 09:02:47, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(997) request_oplock_break: no response

On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, Michael Hennebry wrote: > On Sun, 4 Aug 2019, John Pierce wrote: > >> So you need to modify the source file that NetworkManager is using. >> somewhere in /etc/network or /etc/networking-scripts, a config file has >> DNS0=192.168.0.1 or sokmething, or your system is getting that from DHCP > > Will check on that. I've chacked on that. I've

For whatever reason, the problem I was trying to solve seems to have gone away. I can type in firefox's search box without midco stealing searches. Something changed resolv.conf behind my back. search midcoip.net is there again. I hadn't rebooted or changed firefox's preferences. I'm guessing it was when I turned the connection off and on. To be sure my joy was not tempory, I

I saw a little discussion about this a few weeks ago but nothing concrete. We're running samba-1.9.18p8 under Solaris 2.6x86. I am periodically getting the following in the logfiles, usually _many_ at a time: 1998/11/03 14:42:00 request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 5411 on port 40884 for dev = 1980040, inode = 33c4d When I look up the PID (in this case

On Sun, 4 Aug 2019, Michael Hennebry wrote: > I'm finding elinks hard to navigate, > but at least it's not slowing stuff to a crawl either. Might have written too soon. elinks is starting to slow down, e.g. down arrow sometimes takes a full minute to respond. -- Michael hennebry at web.cs.ndsu.NoDak.edu "Sorry but your password must contain an uppercase letter, a number, a

are you running a name server on 192.168.0.1 ? what that ipv6 address ? On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 3:53 PM Michael Hennebry < hennebry at web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu> wrote: > On Sun, 4 Aug 2019, John Pierce wrote: > > > your DNS settings are in /etc/resolv.conf, just like every other unix > > system since forever. > > Much to my surprise, I found this: > # Generated by

I'm running samba 2.0.7 on Solaris 2.6. We've have terrific success for well over a year with samba until about a week ago I started receiving reports that users could not open MS Office docs saved on a samba share. The samba logs are full of information about oplocks like this: [2001/03/07 10:14:04, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(1204) request_oplock_break: no response

For some strange reason, a samba setup which was previously working has suddenly stopped working, and I can't figure out why. The symptoms is that attempts to write some files onto a samba filesystem take a long time, and then error out with the error message (in Windows dialog box): "Cannot create or replace <filename>: The specified network resource or device is no longer

Has anyone tried using Windows 2000 Professional with Samba? I'm checking it out now, and when I try to connect to a share, I get an error message similiar to the one you get with Win98 and NT4 with SP3+ with encrypted passwords. Does anyone know the equivelant registry path to set plain text passwords? The NT4 path doesn't seem to exist:

I hope someone can enlighten me on this. Situation: NT network, Samba PDC, about 20 NT 4.0 workstations. log(s).smbd are created per machine for easier analysis (as log.smbd.<NetBios Name>). Not often, but often enough to be of concern, are errors in request_oplock_break that seem to indicate that another smbd process that should be listening for break requests on a UDP socket

On Tue, 3 Dec 2019, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 06:51:44PM -0600, Michael Hennebry wrote: >> Any idea what does affect search in resolv.conf ? >> How can I fix this so I do not have to >> manually edit resolv.conf after each reboot. > > Neither of those files are the correct files to edit. > > You want to edit the ifcfg-<interface

First... Hi. Im new in the list and I want to say Hello Second. Apologies because my english writing is too bad. I haven't problem to read. But the verbs and syntaxis when I write is too bad. I will try to read the list without write. I write now because I have a big problem. In this right moment Im downloading the entire archive lists and I will try to ask less. I have a samba server and the