similar to: SAMBA digest 1835

remove

Dear samba@samba.org, Thanks for your recent message regarding `SAMBA digest 1903`. I am out of the office until Monday 14th December 1998. You can contact me after that date. Thanks again! Waine.

Hi friends I just started using wine on my Linux-machine. Mostly because I want to switch finally from Windows to Linux on my computer at work. There is just one single application I want to "take with me" and that is "GraphPad Prism" (http://www.graphpad.com/prism/Prism.htm). So I installed wine0.9.20 on my Mandriva2007. Then I used wine to install Prism in its most recent

=============================================================================== PTL: Prism Technologies, Ltd. http://www.prism.net/secure Netmanage ZPOP v1.1 August 24, 1998 =============================================================================== http://www.prism.net/secure/advisory/PTL.092498.ZPOP ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===

Hello Mark, Did you ever solve this problem? I saw your post but no replies. I'm in the exact same situation. If you have any pointers on where to get this I'd appreciate it. - Paul Hess >From: "Mark Mestdagh" <mestdagh@dma.be> >To: "samba digest" <samba@samba.anu.edu.au> >Subject: TCP/IP >Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 21:40:59

Hello, I am kind of confused with this situation. I am attempting to build a PDC using TLS/SSL with the following version of software. Samba 3.0.23 OpenLDAP 2.3.19 Fedora Core 5 When I startup the Samba server via the "service" command (service smb start) I get the following errors in my logs. Using SSL: Jul 13 09:52:34 prism smbd[23161]: smbldap_search_suffix: Problem during

I'm working with 3 different data sets and applying this non-linear regression formula to each of them. nls(Y ~ (upper)/(1+10^(X-LOGEC50)), data=std_no_outliers, start=list(upper=max(std_no_outliers$Y),LOGEC50=-8.5)) Previously, all of the regressions were calculated in Prism, but I'd like to be able to automate the calculation process in a script, which is why I'm trying to move to

Hi there . Some one know how fix this??? I tried a lot of diffierent thinks, but nothing. and my Freebsd Access point keep crashing some time when I use cards prism 2.5 , but dosen't crash with prism 2 . The problem is I must to use prims 2.5 because it's a high power card, and work really well until crash. thanks!! -- Marcos Biscaysaqu Systems Administrator ThePacific.Net Ltd.

Hi There . Iam runnig a Freebsd5.0 Access Point with a PCMCIA card PRISM 2.5 chipset 200mw , I have got 32 clients on it but is not working fine, keep crashing and I have lot wi0: timesouts on the screen. I was using with same computer other prism card but prism2 and that card work very well but with a lot lower power and more noise because I need use an Ampl. With The prism2.5 the Access

Hi there, I recently installed a plugin for SquirelMail (php imap client, squirrelmail.org) which adds up message sizes per folder to display a nice total size of each subscribed folder. After consulting the plugin maintainers at SquirrelMail in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.plugins/12468/focus=12468 There is quite a discrepancy in the rfc822.size reported by

I have several SCO UNIX system were I would like to install Samba. Some of these machines are running SCO 5.0.7 which comes with a Samba version 2.2, the other machines running SCO 5.0.6 do not have Samba. I would like to upgrade the Samba to V.3 on the newer machines and to be able to install it on the older systems, but I am unable to find out a download from Samba.org for SCO. Could some one

Hi There. The next information was tested with more than 4month with a lot of client and with a nasty traffic. The only problem what with couldn't fix yet is some timesout coming from the wireless card some times but doesn't crash the traffic or the wireless card! the conclusion to make a good Access Point with freebsd is the next: We have a good and very nice hardware and software

I'm attempting to calculate a regression in R that I normally use Prism for, because the formula isn't pretty by any means. Prism presents the formula (which is in the Prism equation library as Heterologous competition with depletion, if anyone is curious) in these segments: KdCPM = KdnM*SpAct*Vol*1000 R=NS+1 S=(1+10^(X-LogKi))*KdCPM+Hot a=-1*R b=R*S+NS*Hot+BMax c = -1*Hot*(S*MS+BMax) Y

I've installed Samba ("latest") on SCO's openserver 5 with a WIN'95 hanging off of it as a client. I can run every test in DIAGNOSI.txt except for number 2. That is, the WIN'95 box can not ping the SCO box within a reasonable amount of time. (SCO can ping the WIN'95 box fine). For the longest time I thought the WIN'95 box couldn't ping the SCO box but I

I apologize if this has been addressed before; recently I read an article in Forbes which discussed how SCO was going after companies that have been using Linux. The article made the point that the ideas behind GPL are under attack precisely because no one is making sure that the code being put into the freely avail. packages isn't owned by someone else. Here's my question: Is R

For those of you following the IBM vs SCO legal case, you have probably noticed that SCO has said that the GPL is invalid. IBM appears to make the reasonable case that you can't say something is void, and then rely on it. INAL, but why is SCO allowed to distribute Samba without agreeing to the GPL? That's like buying a car, then claiming the sale agreement is bogus but you still want

Does anyone know the most up to date version of Samba that will run on SCO OpenServer 5.0.7? Kind Regards Dave Nolan Anchor Technology

Has anyone here installed samba on sco? I might have to install samba on a SCO 3.2 v 5.0.5 server and was wondering if there might be any complications, I'm used to freebsd so I'm not sure what I'm in for.

From: Dag Wieers > Sorry to interrupt but he was describing how you appeared in previous > postings. And I have to say that I felt the same way reading some of your postings. Really? Then I'll re-read them since there's been a second confirmation. Just know that I wasn't trying to make it about good/bad. I'm just trying to make the point that companies aren't just

I''m looking for some evidence, backup up with dates and references, that shows that the Linux community responds to security problems more quickly than other OS vendors, and thus might be considered "more secure". A number of fairly high profile corporations are starting to look for such information as they consider Linux as an alternative solution to other UNIXes. Something