similar to: Letter case not preserved

Hi all: I have setup Samba on our Solaris server with user based security (though the usernames on the Solaris box differ from our NT/Win95 usernames). Everything seems to work well when I connect from an NT client (4.0) since it asks for a "connect as" string (username), but on 95, I cannot seem to specify a username (and therefore cannot gain access to the server). Is there anyway

Hi, I am running version 1.9.18p8 on Solaris 2.6 connecting to NT 4.0 sp3. When I am logged in as administrator I can't connect to any samba share. My username map contains just "root = Administrator" and my smb.conf file has the following entries: password level = 2 security = server encrypt passwords = yes password server = ntsrv002 ntsrv003 username map =

Hi, I recently tried to connect to a samba share as my user name, and then disconnected the share to try and reconnect as root. I got the message "The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials". Someone recently mentionned that this was a security feature on the NT side. Well, seems Microsoft is claiming this is actually a bug. Found the following article in

Hi, I've install Samba on AIX 3.2.5 and I'd like to know if there are large companies using Samba ? What's the size of your company ? How many users ? Do you know a limit of Samba ? (performances) Thanks Vincent Ceriani

I've got this share on my Samba server, configured as follows: [opt] comment = Mapped to /opt partition path = /opt public = no only guest = no writable = yes printable = yes And when I try to connect with Map Network Drive, I get the following error message on my NT Workstation: Account not allowed to log in from this station. The user name I use to connect is a valid

I've been doing about three days of reading on this now, and I'm still pretty much at the same point. I just want my Samba machine to appear in the browse lists, like any other workstation. Questions: 1) My NT workstation had to join the domain and an account had to be created for it on the PDC. Must I create an account on the PDC for the Samba machine as well? (It would make sense,

OK, med 19:00 sv tid /Lennart At 13:05 1998-11-07 +1100, you wrote: > SAMBA Digest 1867 > >For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.anu.edu.au/listproc >Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) Re: nis homedir troubles > by Jeremy Allison <jallison@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com> > 2) calling all Samba vendors! > by Andrew Tridgell

Hello Volker, I was able to get those level 10 logs - spitted by machine. Unfortunately I don't know how attachments behave - Groupwise seems not to be happy with those - so I try the redundant way: Here are the logfiles for this event (only one machine, one try): https://www.bitmammut.de/WDR/log.klnmszap32 In this file there are about 3 occurrences of the

Hi, in the following scenario I've got the Problem of "STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION". Client A (with User 1) copies a file to share X. (with: DENY_NONE 0x120196 WRONLY NONE) Client B (with User 1) reads this file from share X (with: DENY_NONE 0x120089 RDONLY NONE) Now Client C (with User 1) wants also to read this file from share X and gets the STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION.

On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 at 07:15, Hooton, Gerard <g.hooton at ucc.ie> wrote: > > Hi All, > I am having problems with a kickstart install of CentOS 8 > When I try to do a completely automated install using PXE/UEFI it get to the point where it reads the kickstart config file. > Then I see the following message > "kickstart install Started cancel waiting for multipath

Hi All, I am having problems with a kickstart install of CentOS 8 When I try to do a completely automated install using PXE/UEFI it get to the point where it reads the kickstart config file. Then I see the following message "kickstart install Started cancel waiting for multipath siblings for nvme0n1" This is what I have in the kickstart file # Clear the Master Boot Record zerombr #

Dear Recipient, It has been noticed that you have been receiving internal e-mails addressed to you at the @wdr.com internet address. On 31st August 2001, this internet address will no longer be applicable to the bank, and you will therefore not receive the e-mail. Please ensure that any people or applications sending e-mails to you using the @wdr.com address, change to using the @ubsw.com

Hi there. I'm running Samba 2.2.3a on RedHat 7.1 + kernel 2.4.17. My girlfriend's laptop is running Windows 2000 + service pack 2. She has about a thousand MP3s stored on a Samba share on my RedHat machine. We were finding that she couldn't rename any MP3s on the Samba share: she would always get a sharing violation. After a day of reading Samba logs at debug 10 (_such_ fun [ ;)

Unstable release in 1.8 series. Overview of changes in lightdm 1.7.2 * Fix incorrectly distributed guest-session apparmor data Overview of changes in lightdm 1.7.1 * Fix .pc file for liblightdm-qt5-3 * Add a new option "autologin-in-background" which lets an autologin happen in a second display while still showing the greeter. * Stop if fail to create default

Hello, I’m trying to perform a REML analysis using the lmer() function (lme4 package). Well, it seems to work well, except that I’m not getting any p-value (see example below). Can someone tell me what I did wrong? Thanks for your help, Amélie > library(gdata) > dive <- read.xls("C:/Documents and Settings/Amelie/My Documents/Postdoc/CE 2005-2006/divebydive.xls",

I''ve recently installed Debian Lenny witch Xen (xen-utils, xen.tools and xen-linux-system-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64). I want to virtualize some windows servers, but I''m unable to connect to localhost VNC when I start the vm (xm create) to proceed with windows instalation. The VM config is: import os, re arch = os.uname()[4] if re.search(''64'', arch):

We've recently completed an internal eval of products to server Unix filesystems from our Unix fileservers to our NT clients via SMB. We evaluated two products, one of them was Samba 1.9.18pl10, the other was a commercial product. We've selected Samba. We had been using the commercial product for some time. All is great, fine, dandy. But, as a result of our experience with the

On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 11:09:17AM +0200, Alexander Gast wrote: > I was able to get those level 10 logs - spitted by machine. > Unfortunately I don't know how attachments behave - Groupwise seems not to be happy with those - so I try the redundant way: > > Here are the logfiles for this event (only one machine, one try): > https://www.bitmammut.de/WDR/log.klnmszap32 > >

Update: I added my debugging stuff (just a bunch of Print()s and dprintf()s) to the branch without the multinic fix to see if I could find a common cause somewhere. This is based on commit 8702009f. Where I expected the machine to crash again, it just exited back to the bootloader without crashing. So.. somehow adding this debug code solved the crashing problem? Or did it? Then I went back

Here's a second set of diffs for sanity-checking smb.conf files. This one implements a basic set of checks on netbios names. No, it won't recognize someone using an ip address, but it will realize the dots don't belong: $ testparm Load smb config files from /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf WARNING: netbios name "127.0.0.1" contained a dot, which is only legal in DNS domain