similar to: Logon Musings

we are using samba Version 1.9.18p8 and want to connect WIN-NT 3.5.1 to Samba- supportet Unix-Drives; but for any reason the password for this connection is always needed (we did the registry for enableplaintextpassword); the same connection is done well on WIN95 could you figure out, what our problem is??? thank you Klaus-Dieter Wurm (dieter.wurm@de.origini-it.com)

Funny thing happening with an NT Client: it sees all the files in a public Samba share, but when I make any change (like renaming a file or dropping files into it) the change doesn't show up in the window until I press F5 (Refresh). Is it some config in Samba whichs defaults to "lazy" behavior which I'm failing to see? Thanx 4All, Juan --

Hello, I have a question regarding my shorewall setup. I?m not yet subscribed to the mailing list. My firewall has two interfaces: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:04:76:96:B7:1A inet addr:10.48.20.30 Bcast:10.48.31.255 Mask:255.255.240.0 inet6 addr: fe80::204:76ff:fe96:b71a/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX

Hello R experts, Is there any possibility to perform exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) in R? Which package should I use? Thanks a lot for help, Krzysztof

Bloody H3ll... I replied only to the person who sent it. Hey, maybe this list could stick a Reply-To field to the incoming messages before broadcasting them? Juan Carlos Castro y Castro wrote: > Andrew J Miles wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > We've just started using MS Visual C++, and have a problem that I believe > > might be related to the samba server. >

Hi! Is there any syntax for read list or write list in smb.conf that allows me to specify users NOT in a group? Something like read list = !@writers Cheers, -- LOGY IS POLICY @ THE END UST NO ONE @ DE E @ BELI O *************************** R N T EVE THE LIE @ AP * FIGHT THE FUTURE!!! * T ___THE___ Y A

Helooooww ow ow... -- ROTINJAILPINOCHET*APODRE?ANACADEIAPINO * Valeu, LORDES! C T That's it LORDS! H E Enhorabuena LORDES! E OGY IS POLICY @ THE END HCONIPLECRACALNESARDUPETEUQ*LIAJNITORT L ***************** O * FIGHT * UST NO ONE @ DE E @ BELIEVE THE LIE @ AP * THE *

Hello all, this may be slightly offtopic :-) I have some Cisco 7940 phones with SIP firmware, connected to an Asterisk 1.2.18-BRIstuffed-0.3.0-PRE-1y-g (HorstBox Pro with custom extensions.conf). On some of the phones, two lines are configured, one for business, one for private calls. When forwarding a line to another destination (e.g. to voicemail), we can't use the phone's own

Hallo everybody, today i've released the very first (and very alpha :-) version of ABCTI, a CTI solution for Asterisk written in python, using pyGTK and py-Asterisk. It talks directly to the Manager API, so no additional software is required on the Asterisk server. You can find it on Sourceforge as http://abcti.sourceforge.net Basic functionality is already there: Originate, Transfer,

Please excuse me if this has been covered, but I just noticed something odd with samba 2 beta 1. If I use smbclient to connect to a passworded resource on a win machine (I've tried it with 98/95) and I just hit enter for the password, it lets me in. No questions asked. So, I pretty much have unlimited read access to stuff I should not be able to get to. Best Regards. If this is the wrong

Hallo, ABCTI (an open-source CTI client for Asterisk) has moved to beta stage. Find it on: http://abcti.sourceforge.net For the first time, we now have windows installers that actually work ;-) We would appreciate any feedback you can give. Regards, -- o

On 13.11.20 13:22, Paul C. Anagnostopoulos via llvm-dev wrote: > Your suggestion for two passes is indeed my plan if simply using 3-byte sizes is not acceptable. I don't want to duplicate all the logic in a second length-calculating function, so I would just have special logic for the three matching operators with children and use the existing function for the rest, passing a null output

Would it make sense for TableGen to generate the outer OPC_SwitchOpcode offset table? At 11/13/2020 07:53 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote: >That said, if we are seriously thinking about the performance of the byte code, perhaps some of these opcodes should be reconsidered at a higher level anyway. > >For example: The overall bytecode always begins with an OPC_SwitchOpcode implemented as a

I took a look at all the OPC_SwitchOpcode operators in the matching tables. Almost every target starts with a large one, which is now cached by the interpreter. Instead, TableGen could build the opcode -> offset table. But there are also many other opcode switches with between 10 and 70 cases. To speed these up, we could embed a sorted opcode -> offset table right in the matcher code. Or,

Yes, we can. But I think either solution is going eliminate the relaxation step completely, Either we will always use 3-byte sizes or we will make a first pass to size everything and then a second pass to emit the code. Either way, no relaxation is necessary. >Can we skip the relaxation step if comments aren't being emitted? >Comment emission is off by default in CMake configuration.

As a perpetual Rails dabbler, I make an awful lot of typical beginner mistakes. And the logs are always either too verbose or too sparse to help me. And it started me thinking. I came from one of the largest production OLTP systems in the world, and the one thing that helped us manage troubleshooting in both development and production was extensive, obsessive, flexible logging. Every operation

Your suggestion for two passes is indeed my plan if simply using 3-byte sizes is not acceptable. I don't want to duplicate all the logic in a second length-calculating function, so I would just have special logic for the three matching operators with children and use the existing function for the rest, passing a null output stream. Or I could conditionalize all the output on another function

IMHO, our big picture challenge is that multiple explanations for several topics are spread out over several different docs and pages One parameter is frequently discussed in four or more places (QSG, files reference pages, file comments, main documentation, etc.) That gives multiple perspectives, which can be good, but can also lead to at least the appearance, especially to a beginner, of

This is great! Thanks Paul! I think that the 9x reduction in compile-time is well worth the 4% size increase. TableGen's run-time has been a sore point and a source of complaints for quite some time. -- Krzysztof Parzyszek kparzysz at quicinc.com AI tools development -----Original Message----- From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Paul C.

I want to install a linux samba server to serve 30 win9x machines. I want to prevent users from writing on the local drives, they should have write access only to their home dirs on the samba box. These users have a nasty habit of deleting crucial system files. Is it at all possible with win9x and samba? Of course NT workstations could resolve the problem, but that's not an option with these