similar to: passthru

:') I have a small block of addresses allocated by the ISP. In order to conserve those addresses, I have constructed a Linux box (2.0.33 SuSE 5.1) to do IP_masq. (Works wonderfully. SuSE is the best kept secret in the Linux community.) Problem is related to Samba. I MUST be able to relocate NT clients behind my Linux system. I have tried several different methods of configuration for

Hello, Since the ipmasq package has been dropped from debian I decided to migrate to shorewall. My setup is pretty simple: [DSL Modem] -eth0- [shorwall/gateway] -eth1- [local network] ipmasq required that I set the MTU on eth0 to 1492. Migrating to shorewall went well, but a small number of web sites would load slow or not at all. Setting the MTU on eth0 to 1492 and setting CLAMPMSS=Yes

Hi, I am trying to configure two identical systems with the following setup. dom0: Centos 6 OS on Apple Xserve i7 server with PCI cards for 4GB FC (LSI FC949ES) and 10GB Ethernet (Intel 82598EB) dom1: Centos 5 OS with passthru mode of PCI 4GB FC and 10GB Ethernet (ixgbe and mptfc blacklisted in dom0) Everything starts ok, but networking in dom1 using the 10GB interface has extremely high rtt

I think this has been addressed a few times, but without quite satisfactory results. I have a private subnet behind an NAT proxy server (IPMASQ), and a public subnet on the other side with the NT PDC on the public. (Using both NetBEUI & TCP/IP). The PDC will change later, but currently I'm trying to find out how this all works before I do that. I'm trying to make a client machine on

subscribe

I previously reported this on the centos mailing list: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-November/085672.html And I've found out that Red Hat has backported the VT-d support from Xen 3.3 to RHEL 5.4. http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-November/085677.html It seams to me that the "classic" Xen pci-passthru (up to Xen 3.2) works only on some minor cases as

Hi everyone, I'm trying to send a FAX with the following configuration: Analog FAX machine (OKI) <----->SPA21000<----->LAN<----->Asterisk<--------> PSTN I'm restricted to use passthru mode for faxing, instead of T.38 protocol, because the Asterisk box is running v1.2 and cannot be changed as it is in a heavy production environment. Anyway, it "should"

# HG changeset patch # User Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@novell.com> # Date 1288301229 21600 # Branch xend-pci # Node ID 461b9d3a643a2c67c961d9fc468a804891f3770d # Parent 28a16074681582f1209c9077f870ccf44927133e Fix pci passthru in xend interface used by libvirt Attempting to define or create a domain whose XML config contains a passthru PCI device fails with libvirt xen84: # cat win2k8r2.xml ...

Duncan, Yes, I'd been pretty much performing the same diagnosis in parallel - it seems we just don't have that libLLVMSupport library built. Last night, tried the build of clang a few different ways to get that library built - including specifying the --gcc-toolchain option. No Joy! Which of the clang/llvm source trees provides it? or is it in another source package? tools? Is there a

Hi, My environment is as below: Hardware: Dell R210 NICs: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCN5709/5716 (w/o FLR) Xen: xen 4.1.2 Kernel: 3.6.32.57 (final version of xen community) Distribution: Centos 6.2 (upgraded to above kernel) When I added iommu=soft to domU kernel boot line, the PCI passthru-ed NICs can be UP and RUNNING. Otherwise, omit iommu=soft option would make the passthru-ed NICs only UP but

On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 12:21?PM Sonic <sonicsmith at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 2:31?PM Kris Lou via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > named.conf.local > > > ===================== > > > include "/usr/local/samba/private/named.conf"; > > > ===================== > > > > Is the correct

So you have to reset the other account flags after doing it? On 08/15/2019 02:43 PM, Kris Lou via samba wrote: > pdbedit -c="[]" <user> > > This clears the Account Flags (warning, clears ALL Account flags) that you > can also view via "pdbedit -Lv <user>" > > > Kris Lou > klou at themusiclink.net > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 12:11

Hi there, After updating a server from CentOS 5.3 to 5.4 my Xen pci-passthru setup has some troubles. The server has two NICs, one used by dom0 and the other assigned to a domU and one SCSI controler assigned to another domU. It has been working fine since CentOS 5.1, when I did the initial setup. After upgrading to 5.4, I get this error when starting the domU with one of the NICs assigned:

Hi Konrad, Today i tried linuses tree of today (last commit is 4c4d285ad5665bfbd983b95fde8d7a477d24a361). It boots dom0 fine, but it fails to start any domU with: "Error: Failed to query current memory allocation of dom0." With my previous 3.1.5 kernel everything is fine, nothing else changed in config in between. dmesg and xm dmesg attached -- Sander Dom0 shows: total

IMHO, in short, learn to use encrypted connections. 2016-07-27 22:38 GMT+02:00 Kris Lou <klou at themusiclink.net>: > As of 4.2.11: https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2016-2112.html > > =================== > New smb.conf option > =================== > > ldap server require strong auth (G) > > The ldap server require strong auth defines whether the

These two patches provide the neccessary infrastructure changes for the processor-passthru driver [www.spinics.net/lists/linux-acpi/msg34655.html] to properly function. The first one is quite easy - we just modprobe the processor-passthru driver. The second allows it to work under AMD machines by exposing the PM RDMSR to dom0. It has been tested with 2.6.32 kernel as well to make sure it does

Hi Would it be possible to add an option to the scp command, so that if a destination file already exists, rather than overwriting it, scp just skips the destination file, prints a message to stderr and returns an error (non-zero) exit? That would help me immensely. Also, you might want to think about providing a way to execute a series of ssh, scp and sftp commands through one authentication

Anyone have experience with T.38 passthru in Asterisk 1.4 to a MAX TNT Media Gateway? We're experiencing sporadic results... Topology is described below... Thanks in advance.. -Joe Traditional Fax <-Analog Line-> ATA <-SIP-> Ast1.4T.38Passthru <-SIP-> MAX TNT <-PRI-> PSTN -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I'm trying to get Asterisk to pass thru calls using the G729 codec. I've got a 7960 phone and my gateway is an AS5400. I got the following messages when debugging SIP (7778881000 is the 7960): WARNING[1872]: channel.c:2115 ast_channel_make_compatible: No path to translate from SIP/7778881000-2874(4) to SIP/as5400-35c1(256) WARNING[1872]: app_dial.c:1002 dial_exec: Had to drop call

On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 10:11:19 -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote: > Ppatch 2 is in response to the community request for a 3 netdev > solution. However, it creates some issues we'll get into in a moment. > It extends virtio_net to use alternate datapath when available and > registered. When BACKUP feature is enabled, virtio_net driver creates > an additional 'bypass' netdev