similar to: Slowdown when copying large files (PR#8617)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Slowdown when copying large files (PR#8617)"

1998 Jul 28
4
problems with samba 1.9.18p8
I recently installed samba 1.9.18p8. Since then, we get the following error: "No domain server was available to validate your password. You may not be able to gain access to some network resources." after the server has been running for >48 hours. If I stop and restart the server, everything is ok again. Our samba server is a Sun Ultra 2170 running Solaris 2.5.1. Any help will
1998 Aug 12
4
NT & Win98 slow copies
Howdy all: For those who are curious (eg, Peter de Groot <pdgtech@wantree.com.au>) here are the (I think) relevant posts from recent samba digests concerning win98 and or NT performance problems copying files between local drives and samba shares. It looks like there should be some new options to play with in the next samba release. Could Jeremy or Andrew confirm? (BTW, nice
1998 Jul 27
1
Slowdown when copying large files (PR#8624)
tl@fairplay.no wrote: > Hmm, I missed the original post, but this sounds like it could be the bug > I reported 15 days ago to samba-bugs (PR#8316) and still haven't got any > responses to. > Sorry, I'm still integrating incoming patches. > If it's the same bug it's mainly the write performance that's bad, and in > reality the performance is worse than
1999 May 19
1
smbd segfaulting in 2.0.4a?
Hi, It looks like smbd in Samba 2.0.4a is segfaulting after receiving a SIGTERM signal (kill -TERM <pid of smbd>): [1999/05/18 23:40:46, 1] smbd/server.c:main(621) smbd version 2.0.4a started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 [1999/05/18 23:40:46, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(216) file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 1014 are available. [1999/05/18 23:41:11, 0]
1998 Dec 03
2
Changing file permissions from NT
We run a Network of Suns (running Samba) and PC-NT (version 4, sp3) machines, at work, and find it very annoying to be unable to change the file permissions of files from NT on the Suns. Is there any way to change the permissions from NT file explorer or otherwise ? Dave Kirkby
1997 Jul 21
2
socket options
Do the socket options still work with versions of samba above 1.9.16p10? I get error messages both on the command line and in the smb.log file that say: Unknown socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY Unknown socket option TCP_NODELAY Here is my smb.conf Global parameter entry: socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY Do these have to be compiled into the Samba program? If these are outdated
1998 Jun 25
1
Bug#23903: samba: samba maps username before authenicating with NT password server
Hi, I am the Debian GNU/Linux of the Samba package in this distribution. Today I received this bug report but since I don't use the authentication method this user mentions, I can't reproduce the problem. I heard Jeremy Allison said something about a bug in 1.9.18p8 regarding user mappings and posted a patch but since the patch is applied to the version of Samba this user is using, I am
1997 Jul 16
0
SCO compilation of 1.9.16p10 and higher
Hello list, We discovered that it was impossible to compile Samba 1.9.16p10 on SCO Openserver 3.2.2 (native compiler). Here's a small patch that fixes this problem: ----cut here---- *** includes.h.orig Sun Feb 23 04:26:40 1997 --- includes.h Mon Jun 30 16:18:27 1997 *************** *** 668,692 **** #include <prot.h> #define crypt bigcrypt #endif - #ifndef EVEREST -
1998 Jul 13
1
password server problem
We are using samba with a NT4.0 Primary Domain Controller as a samba password server. Logon validation on the primary domain controller works fine, the NT machine validates the user password. BUT: On the NT PDC the event log shows numerous entries saying: Unknown user or wrong password Did anybody experience this too ???? Rainer von Bongartz /D/I/L/ rainer.von-bongartz@dil.de
2005 Nov 25
28
ZFS and memcntl(..., MC_SYNC, ...)
It wouldn''t be proper to start my first post here without congratulations and thanks to the ZFS team for such an impressive piece of work. Anyway, on to my query. I''ve been trying out ZFS, with a particular focus in reducing latency in a specific application. This application has a fair amount of random writing going on in the background (which, of course, ZFS will make
1998 Jul 24
2
Slowdown when copying large files
I am currently investigating using samba on a Linux box to provide file server services on our NT LAN (I'm a bit sick of NT doing dummy spits on me). I'm running RH5.1, and have just upgraded samba to samba-1.9.18p8-51.3 (using the rpm from http://samba.anu.edu.au/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/redhat/RPMS/5.1/samba- 1.9.18p8-51.3.i386.rpm) The setup includes several NT servers, one set up as
2013 Nov 15
7
[PATCH 1/2] xfstests: add generic/321 to test fsync() on directories V2
Btrfs had some issues with fsync()''ing directories and fsync()''ing after renames. These three new tests cover the 3 different issues we were seeing. This breaks out the dmflakey stuff into a common helper to be shared between generic/311 and generic/321. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> --- V1->V2: rename test to generic/321 -removed an
2000 Aug 24
2
Problem with Samba-windows98
Hi all I have a linux(susse) running samba and am trying to connect from windows98. I have no problem seeing the linux computer in the network neigbourhood. I can also see the folders shared from it. When Im accessing a folder I get prompted for password (my login on windows98 is the same as for linux). But it doesnt accept the password "Bad password". When I log in from other
2011 Sep 05
17
Rename BTRfs to MuchSlowerFS ?
Hi list, I don''t trust theoretical benchmarks that much and prefer "real-life benchs" on the occasion, so here''s mine: Given 4 laptops, the most powerful of which was running BTRFS and the others ext3 or ext4, all machines running Ubuntu 11.04 Natty 32-bit with a stock Ubuntu 2.6.38-11 kernel, all machines were given the following FS-intensive task : - Upgrade
2003 Mar 26
3
Samba 2.2.8-1 as W2k Member server
Hello I have a problem with setting up Samba as a AD member server. Environment: Linux tux 2.2.20-idepci (Debian Woody) samba 2.2.8-1.woody samba-common 2.2.8-1.woody smbclient 2.2.8-1.woody (samba from people.samba.org/~peloy/samba) Smb.conf: ---cut--- [global] printer driver file = /etc/samba/printers.def encrypt passwords
2015 Jan 22
3
need help with renaming a variable
Hello. I am new to R, so my question/problem might be very basic, but I cannot figure out how to solve it. So, I would really appreciate your help. I would like to rename a variable in a very large file (181GB) called "2013.xdf" that is saved on my external hard drive. I tried running the following code to rename variable # 2 in the file and save this change, which produced some
2000 Nov 21
4
Session logging in Windows98?
I'd like to log all console I/O for an entire session while maintaining normal console I/O. I'm working in Windows98, RGui, R1.1.1. The sink() function is not the answer since it diverts output from the console. In the RFAQ I see references to "...save the contents of the interaction buffer to a file..." and in the R-Help Archive "...just save the console output...". I
2000 Jul 17
4
Message not deliverable
A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Text Item Type: application/octet-stream Size: 22015 bytes Desc: Unknown data type Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20000717/d81c1f66/TextItem.obj
2004 Apr 29
1
openMosix vs SNOW: redhat kernel causing slowdown?
Hi there, We're currently attempting to explain a slowdown of an LVQ-type parallel analysis we're working on. We are benchmarking our analysis running over openMosix against the same running via SNOW for R. Both perform similarly on small datasets, but on large datasets SNOW drastically outperforms openMosix. However, these results are achieve running SNOW on the default RedHat
2012 Jul 07
1
[LLVMdev] Exception handling slowdown?
On Jul 7, 2012, at 12:10 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > On 07/07/12 02:20, John McCall wrote: >> On Jul 6, 2012, at 3:48 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: >>> On Jul 5, 2012, at 1:33 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >>>> Hi Bill, >>>> >>>>> Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem? >>>> >>>>